20 世纪 60 年代印度制药业的品牌监管：对 1968 年关税委员会报告的审查

IF 1.7 Q3 MANAGEMENT

IIMB Management Review Pub Date : 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.iimb.2024.02.002

Manu Kanchan

{"title":"20 世纪 60 年代印度制药业的品牌监管：对 1968 年关税委员会报告的审查","authors":"Manu Kanchan","doi":"10.1016/j.iimb.2024.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The literature on the Indian pharmaceutical industry has examined the importance of product patents and the attempts policy has made to regulate them. However, it has not done the same for the question of brands. Our study addresses this gap. The Tariff Commission Report of 1968, a turning point in the price control policies of the 1960s, is examined. The examination revealed two important points: first, there were attempts to regulate brands through policies; and second, brands were of high importance to all the major industry players. This became evident in the industry's resistance to the government's regulatory efforts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46337,"journal":{"name":"IIMB Management Review","volume":"36 1","pages":"Pages 83-92"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0970389624000028/pdfft?md5=f1a0757e90ac4b3d0a63f98a96725ca6&pid=1-s2.0-S0970389624000028-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulation of brands in the Indian pharmaceutical industry in the 1960s: Examination of the Tariff Commission Report, 1968\",\"authors\":\"Manu Kanchan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.iimb.2024.02.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The literature on the Indian pharmaceutical industry has examined the importance of product patents and the attempts policy has made to regulate them. However, it has not done the same for the question of brands. Our study addresses this gap. The Tariff Commission Report of 1968, a turning point in the price control policies of the 1960s, is examined. The examination revealed two important points: first, there were attempts to regulate brands through policies; and second, brands were of high importance to all the major industry players. This became evident in the industry's resistance to the government's regulatory efforts.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46337,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IIMB Management Review\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 83-92\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0970389624000028/pdfft?md5=f1a0757e90ac4b3d0a63f98a96725ca6&pid=1-s2.0-S0970389624000028-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IIMB Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0970389624000028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IIMB Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0970389624000028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

有关印度制药业的文献研究了产品专利的重要性以及政策对其进行监管的尝试。然而，对于品牌问题却没有进行同样的研究。我们的研究填补了这一空白。1968 年关税委员会报告是 20 世纪 60 年代价格管制政策的转折点，我们对该报告进行了研究。该研究揭示了两个重要问题：首先，有人试图通过政策来规范品牌；其次，品牌对所有主要行业参与者都非常重要。这从该行业对政府管制努力的抵制中可见一斑。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Regulation of brands in the Indian pharmaceutical industry in the 1960s: Examination of the Tariff Commission Report, 1968

The literature on the Indian pharmaceutical industry has examined the importance of product patents and the attempts policy has made to regulate them. However, it has not done the same for the question of brands. Our study addresses this gap. The Tariff Commission Report of 1968, a turning point in the price control policies of the 1960s, is examined. The examination revealed two important points: first, there were attempts to regulate brands through policies; and second, brands were of high importance to all the major industry players. This became evident in the industry's resistance to the government's regulatory efforts.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

IIMB Management Review MANAGEMENT-

CiteScore

3.20

自引率

5.90%

发文量

审稿时长

68 days

期刊介绍： IIMB Management Review (IMR) is a quarterly journal brought out by the Indian Institute of Management Bangalore. Addressed to management practitioners, researchers and academics, IMR aims to engage rigorously with practices, concepts and ideas in the field of management, with an emphasis on providing managerial insights, in a reader friendly format. To this end IMR invites manuscripts that provide novel managerial insights in any of the core business functions. The manuscript should be rigorous, that is, the findings should be supported by either empirical data or a well-justified theoretical model, and well written. While these two requirements are necessary for acceptance, they do not guarantee acceptance. The sole criterion for publication is contribution to the extant management literature.Although all manuscripts are welcome, our special emphasis is on papers that focus on emerging economies throughout the world. Such papers may either improve our understanding of markets in such economies through novel analyses or build models by taking into account the special characteristics of such economies to provide guidance to managers.