广东话错位：平行链还是循环线性化？

Syntax Pub Date : 2024-02-23 DOI:10.1111/synt.12279

Jackie Yan‐Ki Lai

{"title":"广东话错位：平行链还是循环线性化？","authors":"Jackie Yan‐Ki Lai","doi":"10.1111/synt.12279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper offers a critique of the cyclic linearization account of Cantonese dislocation recently advocated by Lee (2021). It shows that the ordering‐based analysis encounters a number of nonobvious problems when compared with the existing parallel‐chain account (Lai, 2019) and that the latter can be maintained under a broadened empirical landscape. The discussion bears on the development of a general theory of dislocation.","PeriodicalId":501329,"journal":{"name":"Syntax","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cantonese dislocation: Parallel chains or cyclic linearization?\",\"authors\":\"Jackie Yan‐Ki Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/synt.12279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper offers a critique of the cyclic linearization account of Cantonese dislocation recently advocated by Lee (2021). It shows that the ordering‐based analysis encounters a number of nonobvious problems when compared with the existing parallel‐chain account (Lai, 2019) and that the latter can be maintained under a broadened empirical landscape. The discussion bears on the development of a general theory of dislocation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Syntax\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Syntax\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Syntax","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/synt.12279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对李（2021）最近倡导的广东话错位的循环线性化论述进行了批评。它表明，与现有的平行链式论述（Lai，2019）相比，基于排序的分析遇到了许多非显而易见的问题，而后者可以在更广阔的经验视野下得以维持。讨论有助于错位一般理论的发展。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Cantonese dislocation: Parallel chains or cyclic linearization?

This paper offers a critique of the cyclic linearization account of Cantonese dislocation recently advocated by Lee (2021). It shows that the ordering‐based analysis encounters a number of nonobvious problems when compared with the existing parallel‐chain account (Lai, 2019) and that the latter can be maintained under a broadened empirical landscape. The discussion bears on the development of a general theory of dislocation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Syntax

自引率

0.00%

发文量