{"title":"[呼吸机常规重复使用管道和一次性管道的质量控制研究]。","authors":"Li Bao, Yunming Shen, Siwei Xiang, Kun Zheng","doi":"10.3969/j.issn.1671-7104.220779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the effect of routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline on ventilator quality control results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>17 ventilators were randomly selected to conduct quality control using routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline respectively. Quality control data were recorded and then paired <i>t</i>-test method was used to analyze whether the difference between the two pipelines was significant or not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in respiratory rate, tidal volume and end airway pressure between the two types of pipes ( <i>P</i>>0.05). The airway peak pressure of routine reusable pipeline was significantly higher than disposable pipeline ( <i>P</i><0.05), but the difference was very small, only about 0.2 mbar which would not affect the conclusion of quality control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quality control of ventilator is not affected by routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline, which can be replaced by each other.</p>","PeriodicalId":52535,"journal":{"name":"中国医疗器械杂志","volume":"48 1","pages":"111-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Research on the Quality Control of Routine Reusable Pipeline and Disposable Pipeline of Ventilator].\",\"authors\":\"Li Bao, Yunming Shen, Siwei Xiang, Kun Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.3969/j.issn.1671-7104.220779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the effect of routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline on ventilator quality control results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>17 ventilators were randomly selected to conduct quality control using routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline respectively. Quality control data were recorded and then paired <i>t</i>-test method was used to analyze whether the difference between the two pipelines was significant or not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in respiratory rate, tidal volume and end airway pressure between the two types of pipes ( <i>P</i>>0.05). The airway peak pressure of routine reusable pipeline was significantly higher than disposable pipeline ( <i>P</i><0.05), but the difference was very small, only about 0.2 mbar which would not affect the conclusion of quality control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quality control of ventilator is not affected by routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline, which can be replaced by each other.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国医疗器械杂志\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"111-113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国医疗器械杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7104.220779\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国医疗器械杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7104.220779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:探讨常规可重复使用管道和一次性管道对呼吸机质控结果的影响:方法:随机抽取 17 台呼吸机,分别使用常规可重复使用管道和一次性管道进行质控。记录质控数据,然后采用配对 t 检验法分析两种管道之间的差异是否显著:结果:两种管道的呼吸频率、潮气量和气道末压差异无学意义(P>0.05)。常规可重复使用管道的气道峰压明显高于一次性管道(P<0.05),但差异很小,只有约 0.2 毫巴,不会影响质量控制结论:结论:常规可重复使用管道和一次性管道不会影响呼吸机的质量控制,两者可以相互替代。
[Research on the Quality Control of Routine Reusable Pipeline and Disposable Pipeline of Ventilator].
Objective: To explore the effect of routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline on ventilator quality control results.
Methods: 17 ventilators were randomly selected to conduct quality control using routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline respectively. Quality control data were recorded and then paired t-test method was used to analyze whether the difference between the two pipelines was significant or not.
Results: There were no significant differences in respiratory rate, tidal volume and end airway pressure between the two types of pipes ( P>0.05). The airway peak pressure of routine reusable pipeline was significantly higher than disposable pipeline ( P<0.05), but the difference was very small, only about 0.2 mbar which would not affect the conclusion of quality control.
Conclusion: Quality control of ventilator is not affected by routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline, which can be replaced by each other.
期刊介绍:
Chinese Journal of Medical Instrumentation mainly reports on the development, progress, research and development, production, clinical application, management, and maintenance of medical devices and biomedical engineering. Its aim is to promote the exchange of information on medical devices and biomedical engineering in China and turn the journal into a high-quality academic journal that leads academic directions and advocates academic debates.