{"title":"[呼吸机常规重复使用管道和一次性管道的质量控制研究]。","authors":"Li Bao, Yunming Shen, Siwei Xiang, Kun Zheng","doi":"10.3969/j.issn.1671-7104.220779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the effect of routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline on ventilator quality control results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>17 ventilators were randomly selected to conduct quality control using routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline respectively. Quality control data were recorded and then paired <i>t</i>-test method was used to analyze whether the difference between the two pipelines was significant or not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in respiratory rate, tidal volume and end airway pressure between the two types of pipes ( <i>P</i>＞0.05). The airway peak pressure of routine reusable pipeline was significantly higher than disposable pipeline ( <i>P</i>＜0.05), but the difference was very small, only about 0.2 mbar which would not affect the conclusion of quality control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quality control of ventilator is not affected by routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline, which can be replaced by each other.</p>","PeriodicalId":52535,"journal":{"name":"中国医疗器械杂志","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Research on the Quality Control of Routine Reusable Pipeline and Disposable Pipeline of Ventilator].\",\"authors\":\"Li Bao, Yunming Shen, Siwei Xiang, Kun Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.3969/j.issn.1671-7104.220779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the effect of routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline on ventilator quality control results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>17 ventilators were randomly selected to conduct quality control using routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline respectively. Quality control data were recorded and then paired <i>t</i>-test method was used to analyze whether the difference between the two pipelines was significant or not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in respiratory rate, tidal volume and end airway pressure between the two types of pipes ( <i>P</i>＞0.05). The airway peak pressure of routine reusable pipeline was significantly higher than disposable pipeline ( <i>P</i>＜0.05), but the difference was very small, only about 0.2 mbar which would not affect the conclusion of quality control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quality control of ventilator is not affected by routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline, which can be replaced by each other.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国医疗器械杂志\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国医疗器械杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7104.220779\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国医疗器械杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7104.220779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的：探讨常规可重复使用管道和一次性管道对呼吸机质控结果的影响：方法：随机抽取 17 台呼吸机，分别使用常规可重复使用管道和一次性管道进行质控。记录质控数据，然后采用配对 t 检验法分析两种管道之间的差异是否显著：结果：两种管道的呼吸频率、潮气量和气道末压差异无学意义（P＞0.05）。常规可重复使用管道的气道峰压明显高于一次性管道（P＜0.05），但差异很小，只有约 0.2 毫巴，不会影响质量控制结论：结论：常规可重复使用管道和一次性管道不会影响呼吸机的质量控制，两者可以相互替代。
[Research on the Quality Control of Routine Reusable Pipeline and Disposable Pipeline of Ventilator].
Objective: To explore the effect of routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline on ventilator quality control results.
Methods: 17 ventilators were randomly selected to conduct quality control using routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline respectively. Quality control data were recorded and then paired t-test method was used to analyze whether the difference between the two pipelines was significant or not.
Results: There were no significant differences in respiratory rate, tidal volume and end airway pressure between the two types of pipes ( P＞0.05). The airway peak pressure of routine reusable pipeline was significantly higher than disposable pipeline ( P＜0.05), but the difference was very small, only about 0.2 mbar which would not affect the conclusion of quality control.
Conclusion: Quality control of ventilator is not affected by routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline, which can be replaced by each other.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
