[呼吸机常规重复使用管道和一次性管道的质量控制研究]。

Q4 Medicine
Li Bao, Yunming Shen, Siwei Xiang, Kun Zheng
{"title":"[呼吸机常规重复使用管道和一次性管道的质量控制研究]。","authors":"Li Bao, Yunming Shen, Siwei Xiang, Kun Zheng","doi":"10.3969/j.issn.1671-7104.220779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the effect of routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline on ventilator quality control results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>17 ventilators were randomly selected to conduct quality control using routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline respectively. Quality control data were recorded and then paired <i>t</i>-test method was used to analyze whether the difference between the two pipelines was significant or not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in respiratory rate, tidal volume and end airway pressure between the two types of pipes ( <i>P</i>>0.05). The airway peak pressure of routine reusable pipeline was significantly higher than disposable pipeline ( <i>P</i><0.05), but the difference was very small, only about 0.2 mbar which would not affect the conclusion of quality control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quality control of ventilator is not affected by routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline, which can be replaced by each other.</p>","PeriodicalId":52535,"journal":{"name":"中国医疗器械杂志","volume":"48 1","pages":"111-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Research on the Quality Control of Routine Reusable Pipeline and Disposable Pipeline of Ventilator].\",\"authors\":\"Li Bao, Yunming Shen, Siwei Xiang, Kun Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.3969/j.issn.1671-7104.220779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore the effect of routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline on ventilator quality control results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>17 ventilators were randomly selected to conduct quality control using routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline respectively. Quality control data were recorded and then paired <i>t</i>-test method was used to analyze whether the difference between the two pipelines was significant or not.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in respiratory rate, tidal volume and end airway pressure between the two types of pipes ( <i>P</i>>0.05). The airway peak pressure of routine reusable pipeline was significantly higher than disposable pipeline ( <i>P</i><0.05), but the difference was very small, only about 0.2 mbar which would not affect the conclusion of quality control.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Quality control of ventilator is not affected by routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline, which can be replaced by each other.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国医疗器械杂志\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"111-113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国医疗器械杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7104.220779\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国医疗器械杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-7104.220779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨常规可重复使用管道和一次性管道对呼吸机质控结果的影响:方法:随机抽取 17 台呼吸机,分别使用常规可重复使用管道和一次性管道进行质控。记录质控数据,然后采用配对 t 检验法分析两种管道之间的差异是否显著:结果:两种管道的呼吸频率、潮气量和气道末压差异无学意义(P>0.05)。常规可重复使用管道的气道峰压明显高于一次性管道(P<0.05),但差异很小,只有约 0.2 毫巴,不会影响质量控制结论:结论:常规可重复使用管道和一次性管道不会影响呼吸机的质量控制,两者可以相互替代。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Research on the Quality Control of Routine Reusable Pipeline and Disposable Pipeline of Ventilator].

Objective: To explore the effect of routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline on ventilator quality control results.

Methods: 17 ventilators were randomly selected to conduct quality control using routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline respectively. Quality control data were recorded and then paired t-test method was used to analyze whether the difference between the two pipelines was significant or not.

Results: There were no significant differences in respiratory rate, tidal volume and end airway pressure between the two types of pipes ( P>0.05). The airway peak pressure of routine reusable pipeline was significantly higher than disposable pipeline ( P<0.05), but the difference was very small, only about 0.2 mbar which would not affect the conclusion of quality control.

Conclusion: Quality control of ventilator is not affected by routine reusable pipeline and disposable pipeline, which can be replaced by each other.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中国医疗器械杂志
中国医疗器械杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8086
期刊介绍: Chinese Journal of Medical Instrumentation mainly reports on the development, progress, research and development, production, clinical application, management, and maintenance of medical devices and biomedical engineering. Its aim is to promote the exchange of information on medical devices and biomedical engineering in China and turn the journal into a high-quality academic journal that leads academic directions and advocates academic debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信