约旦 PET/CT 中成人 18F-FDG 和 CT 的国家和地方诊断参考水平:研究结果和对实践的影响。

IF 1.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Qays Alhorani, Essam Alkhybari, Mohammad Rawashdeh, Akmal Sabarudin, Rukiah A Latiff, Akram Al-Ibraheem, Mazlyfarina Mohamad
{"title":"约旦 PET/CT 中成人 18F-FDG 和 CT 的国家和地方诊断参考水平:研究结果和对实践的影响。","authors":"Qays Alhorani, Essam Alkhybari, Mohammad Rawashdeh, Akmal Sabarudin, Rukiah A Latiff, Akram Al-Ibraheem, Mazlyfarina Mohamad","doi":"10.1088/1361-6498/ad2c62","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aims to report the findings of Jordanian national diagnostic reference level (NDRL) survey for fluorodeoxyglucose (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG) and local diagnostic reference level (LDRL) of computed tomography (CT) used for attenuation correction and anatomical localisation (AC-AL); and AC and diagnostic CT (AC-DX) within the context of whole-body WB and half-body HB adult oncology PET/CT scanning. Two-structured questionnaires were prepared to gather the necessary information: dosimetry data, patient demographics, equipment specification, and acquisition protocols for identified<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT procedures. The NDRL and achievable dose were reported based on the 75th and 50th percentiles for<sup>18</sup>F-FDG administered activity (AA), respectively. The LDRL was reported based on the 50th percentile for (CTDI<sub>vol</sub>) and (DLP). Data from 562 patients from four Jordanian PET/CT centres were collected. The survey revealed that Jordanian NDRL for AA (303 MBq) was within the acceptable range compared to the published-peer NDRL data (240-590 MBq). However, the<sup>18</sup>F-FDG AA varied across the participated PET/CT centres. The reported LDRL CTDI<sub>vol</sub>and DLP of CT used for (AC-AL) was 4.3 mGy and 459.3 mGy.cm for HB CT scan range, and 4.1 mGy and 659.9 mGy.cm for WB CT scans. The reported LDRL for CTDI<sub>vol</sub>and DLP for HB CT was higher when compared with the United Kingdom (3.2 mGy and 310 mGy.cm). Concurrently, in the context of WB CT, the reported values (i.e. CTDIvol and DLP) were also higher than both Kuwait (3.6 mGy and 659 mGy.cm) and Slovenia (3.6 mGy and 676 mGy.cm). The reported HB CT(AC-DX) was higher than Nordic, New Zealand and Swiss NDRLs and for WB (AC-DX) CT it was higher than Swiss NDRLs. This study reported the first Jordanian NDRL for<sup>18</sup>F-FDG and LDRL for HB and WB CT associated with<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scans. This data is useful for Jordanian PET/CT centres to compare their LDRL to the suggested DRLs and utilise it in the process of optimising CT radiation doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":50068,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Radiological Protection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National and local diagnostic reference levels for adult<sup>18</sup>F-FDG and CT in Jordanian PET/CT: findings and implications in practice.\",\"authors\":\"Qays Alhorani, Essam Alkhybari, Mohammad Rawashdeh, Akmal Sabarudin, Rukiah A Latiff, Akram Al-Ibraheem, Mazlyfarina Mohamad\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6498/ad2c62\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aims to report the findings of Jordanian national diagnostic reference level (NDRL) survey for fluorodeoxyglucose (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG) and local diagnostic reference level (LDRL) of computed tomography (CT) used for attenuation correction and anatomical localisation (AC-AL); and AC and diagnostic CT (AC-DX) within the context of whole-body WB and half-body HB adult oncology PET/CT scanning. Two-structured questionnaires were prepared to gather the necessary information: dosimetry data, patient demographics, equipment specification, and acquisition protocols for identified<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT procedures. The NDRL and achievable dose were reported based on the 75th and 50th percentiles for<sup>18</sup>F-FDG administered activity (AA), respectively. The LDRL was reported based on the 50th percentile for (CTDI<sub>vol</sub>) and (DLP). Data from 562 patients from four Jordanian PET/CT centres were collected. The survey revealed that Jordanian NDRL for AA (303 MBq) was within the acceptable range compared to the published-peer NDRL data (240-590 MBq). However, the<sup>18</sup>F-FDG AA varied across the participated PET/CT centres. The reported LDRL CTDI<sub>vol</sub>and DLP of CT used for (AC-AL) was 4.3 mGy and 459.3 mGy.cm for HB CT scan range, and 4.1 mGy and 659.9 mGy.cm for WB CT scans. The reported LDRL for CTDI<sub>vol</sub>and DLP for HB CT was higher when compared with the United Kingdom (3.2 mGy and 310 mGy.cm). Concurrently, in the context of WB CT, the reported values (i.e. CTDIvol and DLP) were also higher than both Kuwait (3.6 mGy and 659 mGy.cm) and Slovenia (3.6 mGy and 676 mGy.cm). The reported HB CT(AC-DX) was higher than Nordic, New Zealand and Swiss NDRLs and for WB (AC-DX) CT it was higher than Swiss NDRLs. This study reported the first Jordanian NDRL for<sup>18</sup>F-FDG and LDRL for HB and WB CT associated with<sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT scans. This data is useful for Jordanian PET/CT centres to compare their LDRL to the suggested DRLs and utilise it in the process of optimising CT radiation doses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Radiological Protection\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Radiological Protection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ad2c62\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Radiological Protection","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ad2c62","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在报告约旦氟脱氧葡萄糖(18F-FDG)国家诊断参考水平(NDRL)调查结果,以及在全身 WB 和半身 HB 成人肿瘤 PET/CT 扫描中用于衰减校正和解剖定位(AC-AL)以及衰减校正和诊断 CT(AC-DX)的计算机断层扫描(CT)的地方诊断参考水平(LDRL):编制了两份结构化问卷,以收集必要信息:剂量测定数据、患者人口统计数据、设备规格以及已确定的 18F-FDG PET/CT 程序的采集协议。NDRL和可达到剂量分别根据18F-FDG给药活性(AA)的第75百分位数和第50百分位数进行报告。LDRL 根据 (CTDIvol) 和 (DLP) 的第 50 百分位数进行报告:收集了约旦四个 PET/CT 中心 562 名患者的数据。调查显示,与已公布的同行 NDRL 数据(240 至 590 MBq)相比,约旦的给药活性 (AA) NDRL(303 MBq)在可接受范围内。不过,各参与 PET/CT 中心的 18F-FDG AA 各不相同。据报告,用于(AC-AL)的 CT CTDIvol 和 DLP 的 LDRL 在 HB CT 扫描范围内分别为 4.3 mGy 和 459.3 mGy.cm,在 WB CT 扫描范围内分别为 4.1 mGy 和 659.9 mGy.cm。与英国相比(3.2 mGy 和 310 mGy.cm),报告的 CTDIvol 和 HB CT DLP LDRL 较高。同时,WB CT 的报告值(即 CTDIvol 和 DLP)也高于科威特(3.6 mGy 和 659 mGy.cm)和斯洛文尼亚(3.6 mGy 和 676 mGy.cm)。报告的 HB CT(AC-DX)高于北欧、新西兰和瑞士的 NDRL,而 WB(AC-DX)CT 则高于瑞士的 NDRL 结论:本研究首次报告了约旦与 18F-FDG PET/CT 扫描相关的 18F-FDG NDRL 和 HB 和 WB CT LDRL。这些数据有助于约旦 PET/CT 中心将其 LDRL 与建议的 DRL 进行比较,并在优化 CT 辐射剂量的过程中加以利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
National and local diagnostic reference levels for adult18F-FDG and CT in Jordanian PET/CT: findings and implications in practice.

This study aims to report the findings of Jordanian national diagnostic reference level (NDRL) survey for fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) and local diagnostic reference level (LDRL) of computed tomography (CT) used for attenuation correction and anatomical localisation (AC-AL); and AC and diagnostic CT (AC-DX) within the context of whole-body WB and half-body HB adult oncology PET/CT scanning. Two-structured questionnaires were prepared to gather the necessary information: dosimetry data, patient demographics, equipment specification, and acquisition protocols for identified18F-FDG PET/CT procedures. The NDRL and achievable dose were reported based on the 75th and 50th percentiles for18F-FDG administered activity (AA), respectively. The LDRL was reported based on the 50th percentile for (CTDIvol) and (DLP). Data from 562 patients from four Jordanian PET/CT centres were collected. The survey revealed that Jordanian NDRL for AA (303 MBq) was within the acceptable range compared to the published-peer NDRL data (240-590 MBq). However, the18F-FDG AA varied across the participated PET/CT centres. The reported LDRL CTDIvoland DLP of CT used for (AC-AL) was 4.3 mGy and 459.3 mGy.cm for HB CT scan range, and 4.1 mGy and 659.9 mGy.cm for WB CT scans. The reported LDRL for CTDIvoland DLP for HB CT was higher when compared with the United Kingdom (3.2 mGy and 310 mGy.cm). Concurrently, in the context of WB CT, the reported values (i.e. CTDIvol and DLP) were also higher than both Kuwait (3.6 mGy and 659 mGy.cm) and Slovenia (3.6 mGy and 676 mGy.cm). The reported HB CT(AC-DX) was higher than Nordic, New Zealand and Swiss NDRLs and for WB (AC-DX) CT it was higher than Swiss NDRLs. This study reported the first Jordanian NDRL for18F-FDG and LDRL for HB and WB CT associated with18F-FDG PET/CT scans. This data is useful for Jordanian PET/CT centres to compare their LDRL to the suggested DRLs and utilise it in the process of optimising CT radiation doses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Radiological Protection
Journal of Radiological Protection 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
26.70%
发文量
137
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Radiological Protection publishes articles on all aspects of radiological protection, including non-ionising as well as ionising radiations. Fields of interest range from research, development and theory to operational matters, education and training. The very wide spectrum of its topics includes: dosimetry, instrument development, specialized measuring techniques, epidemiology, biological effects (in vivo and in vitro) and risk and environmental impact assessments. The journal encourages publication of data and code as well as results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信