最近对主权行为理论的限制及其对埃及司法独立的意义：对两个案例及其不同影响的研究

IF 0.5 Q3 LAW

Arab Law Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-02-20 DOI:10.1163/15730255-bja10130

Arig M. Eweida

{"title":"最近对主权行为理论的限制及其对埃及司法独立的意义：对两个案例及其不同影响的研究","authors":"Arig M. Eweida","doi":"10.1163/15730255-bja10130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The theory of acts of sovereignty is a serious limitation on the scope of judicial review. This paper examines the recent applications of the theory by the Egyptian State Council and the Supreme Constitutional Court which aim to widen the scope of judicial review by limiting the applications of the theory of acts of sovereignty. The two cases studied were decided amid political tensions. These cases cannot be understood separately from the political environment in which they were decided and the status of guarantees made for the impartiality of judges within this context. This paper argues that although both cases are important steps forward, they fail to establish a lasting limitation on the theory.</p>","PeriodicalId":43925,"journal":{"name":"Arab Law Quarterly","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recent Limitations to the Theory of Acts of Sovereignty and What They Mean for Judicial Independence in Egypt: A Study of Two Cases and Their Distinct Implications\",\"authors\":\"Arig M. Eweida\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15730255-bja10130\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The theory of acts of sovereignty is a serious limitation on the scope of judicial review. This paper examines the recent applications of the theory by the Egyptian State Council and the Supreme Constitutional Court which aim to widen the scope of judicial review by limiting the applications of the theory of acts of sovereignty. The two cases studied were decided amid political tensions. These cases cannot be understood separately from the political environment in which they were decided and the status of guarantees made for the impartiality of judges within this context. This paper argues that although both cases are important steps forward, they fail to establish a lasting limitation on the theory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arab Law Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arab Law Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15730255-bja10130\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Law Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15730255-bja10130","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

主权行为理论严重限制了司法审查的范围。本文研究了埃及国务委员会和最高宪法法院最近对该理论的应用，其目的是通过限制主权行为理论的应用来扩大司法审查的范围。所研究的两个案例都是在政治紧张局势下做出的判决。对这些案件的理解不能脱离其判决时所处的政治环境以及在此背景下对法官公正性的保障状况。本文认为，尽管这两个案例都是向前迈出的重要一步，但它们未能对该理论建立持久的限制。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Recent Limitations to the Theory of Acts of Sovereignty and What They Mean for Judicial Independence in Egypt: A Study of Two Cases and Their Distinct Implications

The theory of acts of sovereignty is a serious limitation on the scope of judicial review. This paper examines the recent applications of the theory by the Egyptian State Council and the Supreme Constitutional Court which aim to widen the scope of judicial review by limiting the applications of the theory of acts of sovereignty. The two cases studied were decided amid political tensions. These cases cannot be understood separately from the political environment in which they were decided and the status of guarantees made for the impartiality of judges within this context. This paper argues that although both cases are important steps forward, they fail to establish a lasting limitation on the theory.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Arab Law Quarterly LAW-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

33.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The leading English-language legal publication in its field, Arab Law Quarterly covers all aspects of Arab laws, both Shari"a and secular. Now in its third decade, it provides an important forum of authoritative articles on the laws and legal developments throughout the twenty countries of the Arab world, notes on recent legislation and case law, guidelines on future changes, and reviews of the latest literature in the field. Particular subject areas covered are Arab laws in trans-national affairs, commercial law, Islamic law (the Shari´a), and international comparative law.