{"title":"一个人,两个老板:重新审视反对双雇主原则","authors":"Charles Wynn-Evans","doi":"10.1093/indlaw/dwae001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This case note reviews the detail of, rationale for, and issues arising in relation to the longstanding principle that in general terms an employee cannot simultaneously have two employers in the context of its impact on the scope and application of labour law protections and its recent consdieration by the Employment Tribunal in its Embery and United Taxis decisions. It is argued that this principle is ripe for recosndieraitona nd restatement, not leasst in the light of the arguments in favour of the adoption of a joint employment model in order, where appropriate, to ensure the effective application of labour standards.","PeriodicalId":45482,"journal":{"name":"Industrial Law Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One Man, Two Guvnors: Revisiting the Principle Against Two Employers\",\"authors\":\"Charles Wynn-Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/indlaw/dwae001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This case note reviews the detail of, rationale for, and issues arising in relation to the longstanding principle that in general terms an employee cannot simultaneously have two employers in the context of its impact on the scope and application of labour law protections and its recent consdieration by the Employment Tribunal in its Embery and United Taxis decisions. It is argued that this principle is ripe for recosndieraitona nd restatement, not leasst in the light of the arguments in favour of the adoption of a joint employment model in order, where appropriate, to ensure the effective application of labour standards.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Industrial Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Industrial Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwae001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Industrial Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/indlaw/dwae001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本案例说明回顾了雇员一般不能同时拥有两个雇主这一由来已久的原则的细节、基本原理和相关问题,并结合该原则对劳动法保护范围和适用的影响以及就业法庭最近在其 Embery 和 United Taxis 判决中对该原则的支持进行了分析。有观点认为,这一原则已经到了重新考虑和重述的时候了,尤其是考虑到有观点赞成采用联合雇佣模式,以酌情确保劳动标准的有效实施。
One Man, Two Guvnors: Revisiting the Principle Against Two Employers
This case note reviews the detail of, rationale for, and issues arising in relation to the longstanding principle that in general terms an employee cannot simultaneously have two employers in the context of its impact on the scope and application of labour law protections and its recent consdieration by the Employment Tribunal in its Embery and United Taxis decisions. It is argued that this principle is ripe for recosndieraitona nd restatement, not leasst in the light of the arguments in favour of the adoption of a joint employment model in order, where appropriate, to ensure the effective application of labour standards.
期刊介绍:
Industrial Law Journal is established as the leading periodical in its field, providing comment and in-depth analysis on a wide range of topics relating to employment law. It is essential reading for practising lawyers, academics, and lay industrial relations experts to keep abreast of newly enacted legislation and proposals for law reform. In addition Industrial Law Journal carries commentary on relevant government publications and reviews of books relating to labour law.