葡萄牙和巴西专业立法中表述的护士自主权:文献研究(1986-2022 年)。

Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P Pub Date : 2024-02-19 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0199en
Maria Ligia Dos Reis Bellaguarda, Paulo Joaquim Pina Queirós
{"title":"葡萄牙和巴西专业立法中表述的护士自主权:文献研究(1986-2022 年)。","authors":"Maria Ligia Dos Reis Bellaguarda, Paulo Joaquim Pina Queirós","doi":"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0199en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the convergence of nurse's autonomy expressed in Brazilian and Portuguese professional practice legislation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Qualitative, social-historical documentary study on the normalization of Brazilian and Portuguese professional standards for nursing practice, materials socialized in the digital collection of the profession's organizational and disciplinary entities. Qualitative analysis from the perspective of Eliot Freidson's sociology of professions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten standards were analyzed, five from each country, which establish legislation for the nurses' professional practice. The following categories emerged: autonomy of knowledge and specific competence of the profession, in the ethical limits of the multi-professional relationship and in the disciplining of training for professional practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The professional autonomy under analysis implies providing access to services and to multi-professionality for the availability of health to society.</p>","PeriodicalId":94195,"journal":{"name":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","volume":"57 ","pages":"e20230199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10876182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nurse autonomy expressed in Portuguese and Brazilian professional legislation: a documentary study (1986-2022).\",\"authors\":\"Maria Ligia Dos Reis Bellaguarda, Paulo Joaquim Pina Queirós\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0199en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the convergence of nurse's autonomy expressed in Brazilian and Portuguese professional practice legislation.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Qualitative, social-historical documentary study on the normalization of Brazilian and Portuguese professional standards for nursing practice, materials socialized in the digital collection of the profession's organizational and disciplinary entities. Qualitative analysis from the perspective of Eliot Freidson's sociology of professions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten standards were analyzed, five from each country, which establish legislation for the nurses' professional practice. The following categories emerged: autonomy of knowledge and specific competence of the profession, in the ethical limits of the multi-professional relationship and in the disciplining of training for professional practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The professional autonomy under analysis implies providing access to services and to multi-professionality for the availability of health to society.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"e20230199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10876182/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0199en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2023-0199en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析巴西和葡萄牙专业实践立法中护士自主权的趋同性:对巴西和葡萄牙护理实践专业标准的规范化进行定性、社会历史文献研究,将专业组织和学科实体的数字化资料社会化。从 Eliot Freidson 的职业社会学角度进行定性分析:分析了 10 项标准,每个国家 5 项,这些标准为护士的专业实践制定了法律。结果:对十项标准进行了分析,每个国家有五项,这些标准为护士的专业实践制定了法律。出现了以下类别:专业的知识和特定能力的自主性、多专业关系的道德限制以及专业实践培训的纪律:结论:所分析的专业自主意味着提供服务和多专业性,以便向社会提供健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nurse autonomy expressed in Portuguese and Brazilian professional legislation: a documentary study (1986-2022).

Objective: To analyze the convergence of nurse's autonomy expressed in Brazilian and Portuguese professional practice legislation.

Method: Qualitative, social-historical documentary study on the normalization of Brazilian and Portuguese professional standards for nursing practice, materials socialized in the digital collection of the profession's organizational and disciplinary entities. Qualitative analysis from the perspective of Eliot Freidson's sociology of professions.

Results: Ten standards were analyzed, five from each country, which establish legislation for the nurses' professional practice. The following categories emerged: autonomy of knowledge and specific competence of the profession, in the ethical limits of the multi-professional relationship and in the disciplining of training for professional practice.

Conclusion: The professional autonomy under analysis implies providing access to services and to multi-professionality for the availability of health to society.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信