挑战黄金标准共识：循证教育中的随机对照试验（RCT）及其误区

IF 4 2区教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Critical Studies in Education Pub Date : 2024-02-18 DOI:10.1080/17508487.2024.2314118

Juan David Parra, D. Brent Edwards Jr

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在提高教育研究人员和从业人员对随机对照试验（RCT）的一些重大缺陷和内部矛盾的认识。虽然批评...

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Challenging the gold standard consensus: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and their pitfalls in evidence-based education

This paper seeks to raise awareness among educational researchers and practitioners of some significant weaknesses and internal contradictions of randomised control trials (RCTs). Although critique...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Critical Studies in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

10.10

自引率

5.10%

发文量

期刊介绍： Critical Studies in Education is one of the few international journals devoted to a critical sociology of education, although it welcomes submissions with a critical stance that draw on other disciplines (e.g. philosophy, social geography, history) in order to understand ''the social''. Two interests frame the journal’s critical approach to research: (1) who benefits (and who does not) from current and historical social arrangements in education and, (2) from the standpoint of the least advantaged, what can be done about inequitable arrangements. Informed by this approach, articles published in the journal draw on post-structural, feminist, postcolonial and other critical orientations to critique education systems and to identify alternatives for education policy, practice and research.