探索全球和地区信息与传播技术发展决定因素中的治理问题

IF 4.2 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Charles S. Saba , Simplice A. Asongu , Nicholas Ngepah , Yolande E. Ngoungou
{"title":"探索全球和地区信息与传播技术发展决定因素中的治理问题","authors":"Charles S. Saba ,&nbsp;Simplice A. Asongu ,&nbsp;Nicholas Ngepah ,&nbsp;Yolande E. Ngoungou","doi":"10.1016/j.ijis.2024.02.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study assesses how governance affects information and communication technology (ICT) at the global level contingent on macroeconomic policy factors such as trade, foreign direct investment (FDI), manufacturing value added, and agricultural value added. The study focuses on 183 countries from 2003 to 2021, and the empirical evidence is based on the generalized method of moments (GMM). The following main findings are established. For the full sample, governance unconditionally promotes ICT development, while trade openness (industrial added value) moderates governance to promote (dampen) ICT development. In sub-Saharan Africa, only trade openness effectively moderates governance to induce an overall positive effect on ICT, while in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, all policy variables moderate governance for an overall positive incidence on ICT sector development. The findings for the MENA region are confirmed in the Europe and Central Asia (ECA) region, with the exception of the moderating role of industrial added value, which engenders an overall negative effect. In the East and South Asia and the Pacific (ESAP) countries, one overall positive incidence is apparent in the role of trade openness, while net negative effects are established from the moderating roles of industrial added value and agricultural added value. In the American sub-sample, a positive (negative) net effect is apparent from the role of industrial added value (trade) in moderating the incidence of governance on ICT sector development. Finally, policy implications are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36449,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Innovation Studies","volume":"8 2","pages":"Pages 132-153"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096248724000055/pdfft?md5=8bcb625f55f13cba4aa94f62eaba5367&pid=1-s2.0-S2096248724000055-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Governance in the exploration of global and regional determinants of ICT development\",\"authors\":\"Charles S. Saba ,&nbsp;Simplice A. Asongu ,&nbsp;Nicholas Ngepah ,&nbsp;Yolande E. Ngoungou\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijis.2024.02.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The present study assesses how governance affects information and communication technology (ICT) at the global level contingent on macroeconomic policy factors such as trade, foreign direct investment (FDI), manufacturing value added, and agricultural value added. The study focuses on 183 countries from 2003 to 2021, and the empirical evidence is based on the generalized method of moments (GMM). The following main findings are established. For the full sample, governance unconditionally promotes ICT development, while trade openness (industrial added value) moderates governance to promote (dampen) ICT development. In sub-Saharan Africa, only trade openness effectively moderates governance to induce an overall positive effect on ICT, while in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, all policy variables moderate governance for an overall positive incidence on ICT sector development. The findings for the MENA region are confirmed in the Europe and Central Asia (ECA) region, with the exception of the moderating role of industrial added value, which engenders an overall negative effect. In the East and South Asia and the Pacific (ESAP) countries, one overall positive incidence is apparent in the role of trade openness, while net negative effects are established from the moderating roles of industrial added value and agricultural added value. In the American sub-sample, a positive (negative) net effect is apparent from the role of industrial added value (trade) in moderating the incidence of governance on ICT sector development. Finally, policy implications are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Innovation Studies\",\"volume\":\"8 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 132-153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096248724000055/pdfft?md5=8bcb625f55f13cba4aa94f62eaba5367&pid=1-s2.0-S2096248724000055-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Innovation Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096248724000055\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Innovation Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096248724000055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了治理如何影响全球层面的信息和通信技术(ICT),取决于贸易、外国直接投资(FDI)、制造业增加值和农业增加值等宏观经济政策因素。本研究以 2003 年至 2021 年的 183 个国家为研究对象,采用广义矩方法(GMM)进行实证研究。主要结论如下。在全部样本中,治理无条件地促进了信息和通信技术的发展,而贸易开放度(工业附加值)则调节了治理对信息和通信技术发展的促进(抑制)作用。在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,只有贸易开放度能有效调节治理,从而对信息和通信技术产生总体积极影响,而在中东和北非地区,所有政策变量都能调节治理,从而对信息和通信技术部门的发展产生总体积极影响。中东和北非地区的研究结果在欧洲和中亚地区得到了证实,但工业附加值的调节作用除外,它产生了总体上的负面影响。在东亚、南亚和太平洋地区(ESAP)国家,贸易开放度的作用显然产生了整体正效应,而工业附加值和农业附加值的调节作用则产生了净负效应。在美国子样本中,工业附加值(贸易)在调节信息和通信技术部门发展的治理影响方面的作用明显产生正(负)净效应。最后,讨论了政策影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Governance in the exploration of global and regional determinants of ICT development

The present study assesses how governance affects information and communication technology (ICT) at the global level contingent on macroeconomic policy factors such as trade, foreign direct investment (FDI), manufacturing value added, and agricultural value added. The study focuses on 183 countries from 2003 to 2021, and the empirical evidence is based on the generalized method of moments (GMM). The following main findings are established. For the full sample, governance unconditionally promotes ICT development, while trade openness (industrial added value) moderates governance to promote (dampen) ICT development. In sub-Saharan Africa, only trade openness effectively moderates governance to induce an overall positive effect on ICT, while in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, all policy variables moderate governance for an overall positive incidence on ICT sector development. The findings for the MENA region are confirmed in the Europe and Central Asia (ECA) region, with the exception of the moderating role of industrial added value, which engenders an overall negative effect. In the East and South Asia and the Pacific (ESAP) countries, one overall positive incidence is apparent in the role of trade openness, while net negative effects are established from the moderating roles of industrial added value and agricultural added value. In the American sub-sample, a positive (negative) net effect is apparent from the role of industrial added value (trade) in moderating the incidence of governance on ICT sector development. Finally, policy implications are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Innovation Studies
International Journal of Innovation Studies Business, Management and Accounting-Strategy and Management
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信