前十字韧带重建后青少年运动员的物理治疗利用率、完成重返运动场测试的时间以及跳跃测试成绩的年龄和性别比较

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Lauren Butler , Elliot Greenberg , Nicholas Giampetruzzi , Meredith Link , Victor Prati , Adam Weaver , Michael Saper
{"title":"前十字韧带重建后青少年运动员的物理治疗利用率、完成重返运动场测试的时间以及跳跃测试成绩的年龄和性别比较","authors":"Lauren Butler ,&nbsp;Elliot Greenberg ,&nbsp;Nicholas Giampetruzzi ,&nbsp;Meredith Link ,&nbsp;Victor Prati ,&nbsp;Adam Weaver ,&nbsp;Michael Saper","doi":"10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.02.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare physical therapy (PT) utilization, timing of return-to-sport (RTS) test and hop test performance by age and between sexes in youth after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Multicenter retrospective cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective review of adolescents after primary ACLR was conducted. Participants completed return-to-sport (RTS) tests including single-legged hop testing. PT frequency, average weekly visits, and timing of RTS test were calculated. T-tests assessed the effect of age and sex on average weekly PT visits and multivariable logistic regressions assessed odds of passing hop tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>289 participants were included (15.7 ± 1.9 years). There was no difference in average weekly PT visits (p = 0.321) or time to RTS test (p = 0.162) by age. There were significant differences in average weekly PT visits (p = 0.047) and mean time from surgery to RTS test (p = 0.048) between sexes with small effect sizes (d = 0.24 and d = 0.21, respectively). Age and sex had no effect on odds of passing hop tests (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.71–2.35 and OR, 0.79; 95%CI, 0.43–1.45, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In a youth cohort, age and sex may have no clinically important effect on PT visit utilization, timing of RTS test or hop test performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49698,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy in Sport","volume":"67 ","pages":"Pages 1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of physical therapy utilization, timing of return-to-sport test completion, and hop test performance by age and between sexes in youth athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction\",\"authors\":\"Lauren Butler ,&nbsp;Elliot Greenberg ,&nbsp;Nicholas Giampetruzzi ,&nbsp;Meredith Link ,&nbsp;Victor Prati ,&nbsp;Adam Weaver ,&nbsp;Michael Saper\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ptsp.2024.02.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To compare physical therapy (PT) utilization, timing of return-to-sport (RTS) test and hop test performance by age and between sexes in youth after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Multicenter retrospective cohort.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective review of adolescents after primary ACLR was conducted. Participants completed return-to-sport (RTS) tests including single-legged hop testing. PT frequency, average weekly visits, and timing of RTS test were calculated. T-tests assessed the effect of age and sex on average weekly PT visits and multivariable logistic regressions assessed odds of passing hop tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>289 participants were included (15.7 ± 1.9 years). There was no difference in average weekly PT visits (p = 0.321) or time to RTS test (p = 0.162) by age. There were significant differences in average weekly PT visits (p = 0.047) and mean time from surgery to RTS test (p = 0.048) between sexes with small effect sizes (d = 0.24 and d = 0.21, respectively). Age and sex had no effect on odds of passing hop tests (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.71–2.35 and OR, 0.79; 95%CI, 0.43–1.45, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In a youth cohort, age and sex may have no clinically important effect on PT visit utilization, timing of RTS test or hop test performance.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Therapy in Sport\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Therapy in Sport\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24000257\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy in Sport","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1466853X24000257","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较前交叉韧带重建(ACLR)术后青少年的物理治疗(PT)使用情况、恢复运动(RTS)测试的时间以及不同年龄段和不同性别间的跳跃测试成绩。参与者完成恢复运动(RTS)测试,包括单腿跳跃测试。计算PT频率、每周平均访问次数和RTS测试时间。T检验评估了年龄和性别对每周平均PT次数的影响,多变量逻辑回归评估了通过跳跃测试的几率。不同年龄的患者每周平均参加运动训练的次数(p = 0.321)和通过 RTS 测试的时间(p = 0.162)没有差异。不同性别的患者每周平均进行 PT 检查的次数(p = 0.047)和从手术到 RTS 测试的平均时间(p = 0.048)存在明显差异,但影响大小较小(d = 0.24 和 d = 0.21,分别为 0.24 和 0.21)。年龄和性别对通过跳跃测试的几率没有影响(OR,1.29;95%CI,0.71-2.35 和 OR,0.79;95%CI,0.43-1.45)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of physical therapy utilization, timing of return-to-sport test completion, and hop test performance by age and between sexes in youth athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Objective

To compare physical therapy (PT) utilization, timing of return-to-sport (RTS) test and hop test performance by age and between sexes in youth after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Design

Multicenter retrospective cohort.

Methods

A retrospective review of adolescents after primary ACLR was conducted. Participants completed return-to-sport (RTS) tests including single-legged hop testing. PT frequency, average weekly visits, and timing of RTS test were calculated. T-tests assessed the effect of age and sex on average weekly PT visits and multivariable logistic regressions assessed odds of passing hop tests.

Results

289 participants were included (15.7 ± 1.9 years). There was no difference in average weekly PT visits (p = 0.321) or time to RTS test (p = 0.162) by age. There were significant differences in average weekly PT visits (p = 0.047) and mean time from surgery to RTS test (p = 0.048) between sexes with small effect sizes (d = 0.24 and d = 0.21, respectively). Age and sex had no effect on odds of passing hop tests (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.71–2.35 and OR, 0.79; 95%CI, 0.43–1.45, respectively).

Conclusion

In a youth cohort, age and sex may have no clinically important effect on PT visit utilization, timing of RTS test or hop test performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy in Sport
Physical Therapy in Sport 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
125
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy in Sport is an international peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for the publication of research and clinical practice material relevant to the healthcare professions involved in sports and exercise medicine, and rehabilitation. The journal publishes material that is indispensable for day-to-day practice and continuing professional development. Physical Therapy in Sport covers topics dealing with the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of injuries, as well as more general areas of sports and exercise medicine and related sports science. The journal publishes original research, case studies, reviews, masterclasses, papers on clinical approaches, and book reviews, as well as occasional reports from conferences. Papers are double-blind peer-reviewed by our international advisory board and other international experts, and submissions from a broad range of disciplines are actively encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信