对言论自由的攻击?考察美国右翼另类社交媒体的内容节制、(去)和(重)平台化

Brittany Shaughnessy, Eliana DuBosar, Myiah J. Hutchens, Ilyssa Mann
{"title":"对言论自由的攻击?考察美国右翼另类社交媒体的内容节制、(去)和(重)平台化","authors":"Brittany Shaughnessy, Eliana DuBosar, Myiah J. Hutchens, Ilyssa Mann","doi":"10.1177/14614448241228850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary research on social media looks different than it did in the late 2010s, with users facing a high-choice social media environment as new platforms emerge. Subsequently, alt-right sites have experienced a rise in users—sometimes those who have experienced content moderation by traditional social media sites. As such, scholars have investigated the impact of this content moderation (e.g. de-platforming) on users and the content posted on new alt-right platforms. This work seeks to expand extant research through analyzing a survey of Gab, Parler (now defunct), Truth Social, and Rumble users ( N = 427) who have experienced content moderation on other social media sites. While we find that those temporarily or permanently banned from traditional sites are unlikely to leave the platform altogether for a right-wing alternative social media (RWASM) site, there are active users on these sites worth studying.","PeriodicalId":508039,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"33 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An attack on free speech? Examining content moderation, (de-), and (re-) platforming on American right-wing alternative social media\",\"authors\":\"Brittany Shaughnessy, Eliana DuBosar, Myiah J. Hutchens, Ilyssa Mann\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14614448241228850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Contemporary research on social media looks different than it did in the late 2010s, with users facing a high-choice social media environment as new platforms emerge. Subsequently, alt-right sites have experienced a rise in users—sometimes those who have experienced content moderation by traditional social media sites. As such, scholars have investigated the impact of this content moderation (e.g. de-platforming) on users and the content posted on new alt-right platforms. This work seeks to expand extant research through analyzing a survey of Gab, Parler (now defunct), Truth Social, and Rumble users ( N = 427) who have experienced content moderation on other social media sites. While we find that those temporarily or permanently banned from traditional sites are unlikely to leave the platform altogether for a right-wing alternative social media (RWASM) site, there are active users on these sites worth studying.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Media & Society\",\"volume\":\"33 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Media & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241228850\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Media & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241228850","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当代的社交媒体研究与 2010 年代末期有所不同,随着新平台的出现,用户面临着一个高选择性的社交媒体环境。随后,另类右翼网站的用户数量出现了增长--有时是那些经历过传统社交媒体网站内容审查的用户。因此,学者们研究了这种内容审核(如去平台化)对用户和新的另类右翼平台上发布内容的影响。这项研究试图通过分析一项对 Gab、Parler(现已解散)、Truth Social 和 Rumble 用户(N = 427)的调查来扩展现有研究,这些用户在其他社交媒体网站上经历过内容审核。我们发现,那些被传统网站暂时或永久封禁的用户不太可能完全离开平台,转投右翼另类社交媒体(RWASM)网站,但这些网站上仍有值得研究的活跃用户。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An attack on free speech? Examining content moderation, (de-), and (re-) platforming on American right-wing alternative social media
Contemporary research on social media looks different than it did in the late 2010s, with users facing a high-choice social media environment as new platforms emerge. Subsequently, alt-right sites have experienced a rise in users—sometimes those who have experienced content moderation by traditional social media sites. As such, scholars have investigated the impact of this content moderation (e.g. de-platforming) on users and the content posted on new alt-right platforms. This work seeks to expand extant research through analyzing a survey of Gab, Parler (now defunct), Truth Social, and Rumble users ( N = 427) who have experienced content moderation on other social media sites. While we find that those temporarily or permanently banned from traditional sites are unlikely to leave the platform altogether for a right-wing alternative social media (RWASM) site, there are active users on these sites worth studying.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信