2004 年至 2023 年七种智慧自评量表的可靠性归纳元分析

Hongyi Lin, Fengyan Wang
{"title":"2004 年至 2023 年七种智慧自评量表的可靠性归纳元分析","authors":"Hongyi Lin, Fengyan Wang","doi":"10.1177/07342829241233789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate measurement of wisdom is the cornerstone of wisdom research. To provide a representative reference for the reliability level and moderating factors of various wisdom self-rating scales, we carried out a reliability generalization meta-analysis of Chinese and English references retrieved from 2004 to 2023. A total of 149 articles were included, as well as seven wisdom self-rating scales. The results showed that all seven wisdom self-rating scales had good internal consistency reliability. The reliability of the original scale was higher than that of the simplified version, and the reliability of the total of the original scale was higher than those of each dimension. Future research should avoid “reliability introduction,” and rather focus on cross-cultural translation of the wisdom scale, selecting the most appropriate measurement tool for the particular field of wisdom, and strengthen theoretical interpretations by connotation and structure of wisdom itself.","PeriodicalId":505063,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis of Seven Wisdom Self-Rating Scales From 2004 to 2023\",\"authors\":\"Hongyi Lin, Fengyan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/07342829241233789\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accurate measurement of wisdom is the cornerstone of wisdom research. To provide a representative reference for the reliability level and moderating factors of various wisdom self-rating scales, we carried out a reliability generalization meta-analysis of Chinese and English references retrieved from 2004 to 2023. A total of 149 articles were included, as well as seven wisdom self-rating scales. The results showed that all seven wisdom self-rating scales had good internal consistency reliability. The reliability of the original scale was higher than that of the simplified version, and the reliability of the total of the original scale was higher than those of each dimension. Future research should avoid “reliability introduction,” and rather focus on cross-cultural translation of the wisdom scale, selecting the most appropriate measurement tool for the particular field of wisdom, and strengthen theoretical interpretations by connotation and structure of wisdom itself.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829241233789\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829241233789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确测量智慧是智慧研究的基石。为了对各种智慧自评量表的信度水平和调节因素提供有代表性的参考,我们对2004-2023年检索到的中英文参考文献进行了信度泛化荟萃分析。共纳入 149 篇文章和 7 个智慧自评量表。结果表明,七个智慧自评量表都具有良好的内部一致性信度。原量表的信度高于简化量表,原量表总信度高于各维度的信度。今后的研究应避免 "信度介绍",而应注重智慧量表的跨文化翻译,选择最适合特定智慧领域的测量工具,并从智慧本身的内涵和结构出发加强理论阐释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis of Seven Wisdom Self-Rating Scales From 2004 to 2023
Accurate measurement of wisdom is the cornerstone of wisdom research. To provide a representative reference for the reliability level and moderating factors of various wisdom self-rating scales, we carried out a reliability generalization meta-analysis of Chinese and English references retrieved from 2004 to 2023. A total of 149 articles were included, as well as seven wisdom self-rating scales. The results showed that all seven wisdom self-rating scales had good internal consistency reliability. The reliability of the original scale was higher than that of the simplified version, and the reliability of the total of the original scale was higher than those of each dimension. Future research should avoid “reliability introduction,” and rather focus on cross-cultural translation of the wisdom scale, selecting the most appropriate measurement tool for the particular field of wisdom, and strengthen theoretical interpretations by connotation and structure of wisdom itself.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信