网络内容监管决策指南

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW
Dan Svantesson
{"title":"网络内容监管决策指南","authors":"Dan Svantesson","doi":"10.1177/1037969x241231327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the seven standard questions that must be confronted in nearly all decisions in the online content regulation field. By mapping out and discussing those standard questions, the article may hopefully aid both legislators and judges engaged in online content regulation. The checklist of questions canvassed here may also be used as a tool to evaluate laws aimed at online content regulation as well as judgments made within this field.","PeriodicalId":44595,"journal":{"name":"Alternative Law Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A decision-making guide for online content regulation\",\"authors\":\"Dan Svantesson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1037969x241231327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines the seven standard questions that must be confronted in nearly all decisions in the online content regulation field. By mapping out and discussing those standard questions, the article may hopefully aid both legislators and judges engaged in online content regulation. The checklist of questions canvassed here may also be used as a tool to evaluate laws aimed at online content regulation as well as judgments made within this field.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternative Law Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternative Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969x241231327\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969x241231327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了网络内容监管领域几乎所有判决都必须面对的七个标准问题。通过对这些标准问题的梳理和讨论,希望能对从事网络内容监管的立法者和法官有所帮助。本文所列出的问题清单也可作为一种工具,用于评估旨在规制在线内容的法律以及在该领域做出的判决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A decision-making guide for online content regulation
This article examines the seven standard questions that must be confronted in nearly all decisions in the online content regulation field. By mapping out and discussing those standard questions, the article may hopefully aid both legislators and judges engaged in online content regulation. The checklist of questions canvassed here may also be used as a tool to evaluate laws aimed at online content regulation as well as judgments made within this field.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信