2020 至 2023 年新闻界围绕可持续发展目标的两极分化网络

Cruz García Lirios, Julio E. Crespo, Juan Masilla Sepulveda, Tirso Javier Hernández Gracia
{"title":"2020 至 2023 年新闻界围绕可持续发展目标的两极分化网络","authors":"Cruz García Lirios, Julio E. Crespo, Juan Masilla Sepulveda, Tirso Javier Hernández Gracia","doi":"10.37868/hsd.v6i1.241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Polarization in the media is a phenomenon classified as ambivalent and volatile because radical positions change to moderate and neutral. The objective of the study was to demonstrate this process in press releases and expert evaluations regarding the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). A documentary, cross-sectional, exploratory, and retrospective work was carried out with a sample of press releases with national circulation and published from 2020 to 2023 headed with SDGs. The results verify the null hypothesis of significant differences between the theoretical structures concerning the empirical observations. The scope and limits of the study are discussed, as well as a local risk communication policy.","PeriodicalId":505792,"journal":{"name":"Heritage and Sustainable Development","volume":"166 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Polarization networks around the SDGs in the press from 2020 to 2023\",\"authors\":\"Cruz García Lirios, Julio E. Crespo, Juan Masilla Sepulveda, Tirso Javier Hernández Gracia\",\"doi\":\"10.37868/hsd.v6i1.241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Polarization in the media is a phenomenon classified as ambivalent and volatile because radical positions change to moderate and neutral. The objective of the study was to demonstrate this process in press releases and expert evaluations regarding the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). A documentary, cross-sectional, exploratory, and retrospective work was carried out with a sample of press releases with national circulation and published from 2020 to 2023 headed with SDGs. The results verify the null hypothesis of significant differences between the theoretical structures concerning the empirical observations. The scope and limits of the study are discussed, as well as a local risk communication policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":505792,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heritage and Sustainable Development\",\"volume\":\"166 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heritage and Sustainable Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37868/hsd.v6i1.241\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heritage and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37868/hsd.v6i1.241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

媒体中的两极分化是一种矛盾和不稳定的现象,因为激进的立场会转变为温和和中立的立场。本研究的目的是在有关可持续发展目标(SDG)的新闻稿和专家评价中展示这一过程。本研究以 2020 年至 2023 年期间发布的以可持续发展目标为主题的全国性新闻稿为样本,开展了一项纪实性、横断面、探索性和回顾性工作。研究结果验证了理论结构与经验观察之间存在显著差异的零假设。讨论了研究的范围和局限性,以及当地的风险交流政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Polarization networks around the SDGs in the press from 2020 to 2023
Polarization in the media is a phenomenon classified as ambivalent and volatile because radical positions change to moderate and neutral. The objective of the study was to demonstrate this process in press releases and expert evaluations regarding the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). A documentary, cross-sectional, exploratory, and retrospective work was carried out with a sample of press releases with national circulation and published from 2020 to 2023 headed with SDGs. The results verify the null hypothesis of significant differences between the theoretical structures concerning the empirical observations. The scope and limits of the study are discussed, as well as a local risk communication policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信