人工智能教育中的 "人在回路中":回顾与实体关系(ER)分析

Bahar Memarian, Tenzin Doleck
{"title":"人工智能教育中的 \"人在回路中\":回顾与实体关系(ER)分析","authors":"Bahar Memarian,&nbsp;Tenzin Doleck","doi":"10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Human-in-the-loop research predominantly examines the interaction types and effects. A more structural and pragmatic exploration of humans and Artificial Intelligence or AI is lacking in the AI in education literature.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>In this systematic review, we follow the Entity-Relationship (ER) framework to identify trends in the entities, relationships, and attributes of human-in-the-loop AI in education.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An overview of <em>N</em> = 28 reviewed studies followed by their ER characteristics are summarized and analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The dominant number of two or three-entity studies, one-sided relationships, few attributes, and many to many cardinalities may signal a lack of deliberation on beings that come to interact and influence human-in-the-loop and AI in education.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The contribution of this work is identifying the implications of human-in-the-loop and AI from a more formal ER perspective and acknowledging the many possibilities for placement of humans in the loop with the AI, system, and environment of interest.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100324,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","volume":"2 1","pages":"Article 100053"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000136/pdfft?md5=56381ca79ed57fe8c61050728815635d&pid=1-s2.0-S2949882124000136-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human-in-the-loop in artificial intelligence in education: A review and entity-relationship (ER) analysis\",\"authors\":\"Bahar Memarian,&nbsp;Tenzin Doleck\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Human-in-the-loop research predominantly examines the interaction types and effects. A more structural and pragmatic exploration of humans and Artificial Intelligence or AI is lacking in the AI in education literature.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>In this systematic review, we follow the Entity-Relationship (ER) framework to identify trends in the entities, relationships, and attributes of human-in-the-loop AI in education.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An overview of <em>N</em> = 28 reviewed studies followed by their ER characteristics are summarized and analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The dominant number of two or three-entity studies, one-sided relationships, few attributes, and many to many cardinalities may signal a lack of deliberation on beings that come to interact and influence human-in-the-loop and AI in education.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The contribution of this work is identifying the implications of human-in-the-loop and AI from a more formal ER perspective and acknowledging the many possibilities for placement of humans in the loop with the AI, system, and environment of interest.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100053\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000136/pdfft?md5=56381ca79ed57fe8c61050728815635d&pid=1-s2.0-S2949882124000136-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882124000136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景环中人的研究主要考察交互类型和效果。目的在这篇系统性综述中,我们采用实体-关系(ER)框架来识别教育领域中人在环人工智能的实体、关系和属性的趋势。方法综述了 N = 28 篇综述研究,并根据其 ER 特征进行了总结和分析。结论这项工作的贡献在于从更正式的ER角度确定了人在环路和人工智能的影响,并承认了将人置于人工智能、系统和相关环境的环路中的多种可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human-in-the-loop in artificial intelligence in education: A review and entity-relationship (ER) analysis

Background

Human-in-the-loop research predominantly examines the interaction types and effects. A more structural and pragmatic exploration of humans and Artificial Intelligence or AI is lacking in the AI in education literature.

Purpose

In this systematic review, we follow the Entity-Relationship (ER) framework to identify trends in the entities, relationships, and attributes of human-in-the-loop AI in education.

Methods

An overview of N = 28 reviewed studies followed by their ER characteristics are summarized and analyzed.

Results

The dominant number of two or three-entity studies, one-sided relationships, few attributes, and many to many cardinalities may signal a lack of deliberation on beings that come to interact and influence human-in-the-loop and AI in education.

Conclusion

The contribution of this work is identifying the implications of human-in-the-loop and AI from a more formal ER perspective and acknowledging the many possibilities for placement of humans in the loop with the AI, system, and environment of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信