印度重要淡水和咸水地区的无颌慈鲷 Etroplus suratensis (Bloch, 1790) 种群评估

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q4 FISHERIES
Ramjanul Haque, Paramita Banerjee Sawant, Jitendra Kumar Sundaray, Rajesh Kumar, Narinder Kumar Chadha, Gouranga Biswas, Avinash Rasal, Priyanka Nandanpawar, Jackson Debbarma
{"title":"印度重要淡水和咸水地区的无颌慈鲷 Etroplus suratensis (Bloch, 1790) 种群评估","authors":"Ramjanul Haque,&nbsp;Paramita Banerjee Sawant,&nbsp;Jitendra Kumar Sundaray,&nbsp;Rajesh Kumar,&nbsp;Narinder Kumar Chadha,&nbsp;Gouranga Biswas,&nbsp;Avinash Rasal,&nbsp;Priyanka Nandanpawar,&nbsp;Jackson Debbarma","doi":"10.1155/2024/7208918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The present study evaluates stocks of <i>Etroplus suratensis</i> concerning length-weight relationships (LWRs), condition factor (<i>K</i>), and truss analysis from different habitats, <i>viz.</i>, West Bengal (freshwater hatchery), Gujarat (brackish water grow-out pond), and Odisha (Chilika lagoon) in India. All the stocks were collected using gill nets with various mesh sizes of 20–50 mm and cast nets with mesh size of 15 mm from February 2021 to September 2021. The total length (<i>L</i>), weight (<i>W</i>), and digital pictures were taken for LWRs and principle component analysis (PCA). The total length (<i>L</i>) and total weight (<i>W</i>) were measured to the nearest 0.1 cm and 0.01 gm, respectively, followed by regression analysis. The values of parameters “<i>b</i>” in the LWRs equation were estimated within the range of 2.50–3.82 and intercept “<i>a</i>” values (0.235–0.779) and “<i>K</i>” (1.07–3.37), respectively, for all different habitats and ecosystems with significant correlation values (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.85). In truss morphometric analysis, principal component 1 (PC1) contributed the highest (93.1%) and principal component 2 (PC2) contributed 4.6% to the size and shape variation amongst the stocks from different habitats and ecosystems. The scatter plot analysis and canonical variate analysis (CVA) have shown that the Gujarat and West Bengal stocks are closely placed and separated from the Chilika-Odisha stock. Similar variations were also observed in the ANOSIM boxplot analysis, where Chilika-Odisha stock scored higher than the other two stocks. Since data available regarding LWRs and truss morphometry studies of <i>E. suratensis</i> from different habitats are limited, the present study will provide a clear insight into the differentiation of <i>E. suratensis</i> stocks from different habitats in India. The overall findings of the present study could be utilized for the conservation and sustainable management of <i>E. suratensis.</i></p>","PeriodicalId":14894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Ichthyology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stock Evaluation of the Euryhaline Cichlid, Etroplus suratensis (Bloch, 1790), from Significant Brackish and Freshwater Regions of India\",\"authors\":\"Ramjanul Haque,&nbsp;Paramita Banerjee Sawant,&nbsp;Jitendra Kumar Sundaray,&nbsp;Rajesh Kumar,&nbsp;Narinder Kumar Chadha,&nbsp;Gouranga Biswas,&nbsp;Avinash Rasal,&nbsp;Priyanka Nandanpawar,&nbsp;Jackson Debbarma\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/7208918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The present study evaluates stocks of <i>Etroplus suratensis</i> concerning length-weight relationships (LWRs), condition factor (<i>K</i>), and truss analysis from different habitats, <i>viz.</i>, West Bengal (freshwater hatchery), Gujarat (brackish water grow-out pond), and Odisha (Chilika lagoon) in India. All the stocks were collected using gill nets with various mesh sizes of 20–50 mm and cast nets with mesh size of 15 mm from February 2021 to September 2021. The total length (<i>L</i>), weight (<i>W</i>), and digital pictures were taken for LWRs and principle component analysis (PCA). The total length (<i>L</i>) and total weight (<i>W</i>) were measured to the nearest 0.1 cm and 0.01 gm, respectively, followed by regression analysis. The values of parameters “<i>b</i>” in the LWRs equation were estimated within the range of 2.50–3.82 and intercept “<i>a</i>” values (0.235–0.779) and “<i>K</i>” (1.07–3.37), respectively, for all different habitats and ecosystems with significant correlation values (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.85). In truss morphometric analysis, principal component 1 (PC1) contributed the highest (93.1%) and principal component 2 (PC2) contributed 4.6% to the size and shape variation amongst the stocks from different habitats and ecosystems. The scatter plot analysis and canonical variate analysis (CVA) have shown that the Gujarat and West Bengal stocks are closely placed and separated from the Chilika-Odisha stock. Similar variations were also observed in the ANOSIM boxplot analysis, where Chilika-Odisha stock scored higher than the other two stocks. Since data available regarding LWRs and truss morphometry studies of <i>E. suratensis</i> from different habitats are limited, the present study will provide a clear insight into the differentiation of <i>E. suratensis</i> stocks from different habitats in India. The overall findings of the present study could be utilized for the conservation and sustainable management of <i>E. suratensis.</i></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Ichthyology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Ichthyology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/7208918\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Ichthyology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/7208918","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了印度西孟加拉邦(淡水孵化场)、古吉拉特邦(咸水养殖池塘)和奥迪沙(奇利卡泻湖)不同栖息地的Etroplus suratensis种群的长度重量关系(LWRs)、条件因子(K)和桁架分析。所有种群都是在 2021 年 2 月至 2021 年 9 月期间使用网目尺寸为 20-50 毫米的刺网和网目尺寸为 15 毫米的撒网收集的。拍摄了总长度(L)、重量(W)和数码照片,以进行 LWRs 和原理成分分析(PCA)。总长度(L)和总重量(W)的测量分别精确到 0.1 厘米和 0.01 克,然后进行回归分析。在所有不同生境和生态系统中,LWRs 方程中的参数 "b "值估计范围为 2.50-3.82,截距 "a "值(0.235-0.779)和 "K "值(1.07-3.37)分别在 2.50 和 3.82 之间,相关值显著(R2≥0.85)。在桁架形态分析中,主成分 1(PC1)和主成分 2(PC2)对不同生境和生态系统种群的大小和形状差异的贡献率分别为 93.1%和 4.6%。散点图分析和典型变量分析(CVA)显示,古吉拉特邦和西孟加拉邦种群与奇利卡-奥迪沙种群的位置很接近,且相互分离。在 ANOSIM 方框图分析中也观察到类似的变化,奇利卡-奥迪沙种群的得分高于其他两个种群。由于来自不同栖息地的 E. suratensis 的长臂辐射率和桁架形态计量学研究数据有限,本研究将为来自印度不同栖息地的 E. suratensis 种群的分化提供一个清晰的视角。本研究的总体结果可用于 E. suratensis 的保护和可持续管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Stock Evaluation of the Euryhaline Cichlid, Etroplus suratensis (Bloch, 1790), from Significant Brackish and Freshwater Regions of India

The present study evaluates stocks of Etroplus suratensis concerning length-weight relationships (LWRs), condition factor (K), and truss analysis from different habitats, viz., West Bengal (freshwater hatchery), Gujarat (brackish water grow-out pond), and Odisha (Chilika lagoon) in India. All the stocks were collected using gill nets with various mesh sizes of 20–50 mm and cast nets with mesh size of 15 mm from February 2021 to September 2021. The total length (L), weight (W), and digital pictures were taken for LWRs and principle component analysis (PCA). The total length (L) and total weight (W) were measured to the nearest 0.1 cm and 0.01 gm, respectively, followed by regression analysis. The values of parameters “b” in the LWRs equation were estimated within the range of 2.50–3.82 and intercept “a” values (0.235–0.779) and “K” (1.07–3.37), respectively, for all different habitats and ecosystems with significant correlation values (R2 ≥ 0.85). In truss morphometric analysis, principal component 1 (PC1) contributed the highest (93.1%) and principal component 2 (PC2) contributed 4.6% to the size and shape variation amongst the stocks from different habitats and ecosystems. The scatter plot analysis and canonical variate analysis (CVA) have shown that the Gujarat and West Bengal stocks are closely placed and separated from the Chilika-Odisha stock. Similar variations were also observed in the ANOSIM boxplot analysis, where Chilika-Odisha stock scored higher than the other two stocks. Since data available regarding LWRs and truss morphometry studies of E. suratensis from different habitats are limited, the present study will provide a clear insight into the differentiation of E. suratensis stocks from different habitats in India. The overall findings of the present study could be utilized for the conservation and sustainable management of E. suratensis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Ichthyology
Journal of Applied Ichthyology 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
73
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Ichthyology publishes articles of international repute on ichthyology, aquaculture, and marine fisheries; ichthyopathology and ichthyoimmunology; environmental toxicology using fishes as test organisms; basic research on fishery management; and aspects of integrated coastal zone management in relation to fisheries and aquaculture. Emphasis is placed on the application of scientific research findings, while special consideration is given to ichthyological problems occurring in developing countries. Article formats include original articles, review articles, short communications and technical reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信