学术骗局

IF 0.4 3区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

METAPHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2024-02-14 DOI:10.1111/meta.12667

Andrew Sneddon

{"title":"学术骗局","authors":"Andrew Sneddon","doi":"10.1111/meta.12667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>What are academic hoaxes, and what should we make of them? This paper argues that academic hoaxes are exercises in pretense, with a complex structure involving both a focal item and a self-revealing dimension, all governed by attitudes about the relevant sort of academic work, that are derivative yet different from the attitudes found in normal participation in publication. Hoaxes done primarily for humorous purposes are unproblematic. Serious academic hoaxes are both inherently risky and poorly suited to accomplish their ends, making them an undesirable feature of the contemporary academic landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":46874,"journal":{"name":"METAPHILOSOPHY","volume":"55 1","pages":"74-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/meta.12667","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academic hoaxes\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Sneddon\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/meta.12667\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>What are academic hoaxes, and what should we make of them? This paper argues that academic hoaxes are exercises in pretense, with a complex structure involving both a focal item and a self-revealing dimension, all governed by attitudes about the relevant sort of academic work, that are derivative yet different from the attitudes found in normal participation in publication. Hoaxes done primarily for humorous purposes are unproblematic. Serious academic hoaxes are both inherently risky and poorly suited to accomplish their ends, making them an undesirable feature of the contemporary academic landscape.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46874,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"METAPHILOSOPHY\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"74-88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/meta.12667\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"METAPHILOSOPHY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/meta.12667\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"METAPHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/meta.12667","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

什么是学术骗局，我们应该如何看待学术骗局？本文认为，学术骗局是一种矫揉造作的行为，其结构复杂，既有焦点问题，又有自我揭示的层面，所有这些都受对相关学术工作的态度的支配，这些态度是衍生的，但又不同于正常参与出版工作的态度。以幽默为主要目的的骗局是没有问题的。严肃的学术骗局既有内在风险，又不适合实现其目的，因此成为当代学术界不受欢迎的现象。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Academic hoaxes

What are academic hoaxes, and what should we make of them? This paper argues that academic hoaxes are exercises in pretense, with a complex structure involving both a focal item and a self-revealing dimension, all governed by attitudes about the relevant sort of academic work, that are derivative yet different from the attitudes found in normal participation in publication. Hoaxes done primarily for humorous purposes are unproblematic. Serious academic hoaxes are both inherently risky and poorly suited to accomplish their ends, making them an undesirable feature of the contemporary academic landscape.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

METAPHILOSOPHY PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Metaphilosophy publishes articles and reviews books stressing considerations about philosophy and particular schools, methods, or fields of philosophy. The intended scope is very broad: no method, field, or school is excluded.