结合人工智能和人类智能管理人道主义物流中的跨文化知识:知识创造的阴阳辩证系统观

IF 6.6 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Tachia Chin, T.C.E. Cheng, Chenhao Wang, Lei Huang
{"title":"结合人工智能和人类智能管理人道主义物流中的跨文化知识:知识创造的阴阳辩证系统观","authors":"Tachia Chin, T.C.E. Cheng, Chenhao Wang, Lei Huang","doi":"10.1108/jkm-06-2023-0458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Aiming to resolve cross-cultural paradoxes in combining artificial intelligence (AI) with human intelligence (HI) for international humanitarian logistics, this paper aims to adopt an unorthodox Yin–Yang dialectic approach to address how AI–HI interactions can be interpreted as a sophisticated cross-cultural knowledge creation (KC) system that enables more effective decision-making for providing humanitarian relief across borders.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This paper is conceptual and pragmatic in nature, whereas its structure design follows the requirements of a real impact study.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Based on experimental information and logical reasoning, the authors first identify three critical cross-cultural challenges in AI–HI collaboration: paradoxes of building a cross-cultural KC system, paradoxes of integrative AI and HI in moral judgement and paradoxes of processing moral-related information with emotions in AI–HI collaboration. Then applying the Yin–Yang dialectic to interpret Klir’s epistemological frame (1993), the authors propose an unconventional stratified system of cross-cultural KC for understanding integrative AI–HI decision-making for humanitarian logistics across cultures.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This paper aids not only in deeply understanding complex issues stemming from human emotions and cultural cognitions in the context of cross-border humanitarian logistics, but also equips culturally-diverse stakeholders to effectively navigate these challenges and their potential ramifications. It enhances the decision-making process and optimizes the synergy between AI and HI for cross-cultural humanitarian logistics.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The originality lies in the use of a cognitive methodology of the Yin–Yang dialectic to metaphorize the dynamic genesis of integrative AI-HI KC for international humanitarian logistics. Based on system science and knowledge management, this paper applies game theory, multi-objective optimization and Markov decision process to operationalize the conceptual framework in the context of cross-cultural humanitarian logistics.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":48368,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knowledge Management","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Combining artificial and human intelligence to manage cross-cultural knowledge in humanitarian logistics: a Yin–Yang dialectic systems view of knowledge creation\",\"authors\":\"Tachia Chin, T.C.E. Cheng, Chenhao Wang, Lei Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jkm-06-2023-0458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Aiming to resolve cross-cultural paradoxes in combining artificial intelligence (AI) with human intelligence (HI) for international humanitarian logistics, this paper aims to adopt an unorthodox Yin–Yang dialectic approach to address how AI–HI interactions can be interpreted as a sophisticated cross-cultural knowledge creation (KC) system that enables more effective decision-making for providing humanitarian relief across borders.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>This paper is conceptual and pragmatic in nature, whereas its structure design follows the requirements of a real impact study.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Based on experimental information and logical reasoning, the authors first identify three critical cross-cultural challenges in AI–HI collaboration: paradoxes of building a cross-cultural KC system, paradoxes of integrative AI and HI in moral judgement and paradoxes of processing moral-related information with emotions in AI–HI collaboration. Then applying the Yin–Yang dialectic to interpret Klir’s epistemological frame (1993), the authors propose an unconventional stratified system of cross-cultural KC for understanding integrative AI–HI decision-making for humanitarian logistics across cultures.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>This paper aids not only in deeply understanding complex issues stemming from human emotions and cultural cognitions in the context of cross-border humanitarian logistics, but also equips culturally-diverse stakeholders to effectively navigate these challenges and their potential ramifications. It enhances the decision-making process and optimizes the synergy between AI and HI for cross-cultural humanitarian logistics.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The originality lies in the use of a cognitive methodology of the Yin–Yang dialectic to metaphorize the dynamic genesis of integrative AI-HI KC for international humanitarian logistics. Based on system science and knowledge management, this paper applies game theory, multi-objective optimization and Markov decision process to operationalize the conceptual framework in the context of cross-cultural humanitarian logistics.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":48368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Knowledge Management\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Knowledge Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-06-2023-0458\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knowledge Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-06-2023-0458","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的为了解决国际人道主义物流中人工智能(AI)与人类智能(HI)相结合的跨文化悖论,本文旨在采用一种非正统的阴阳辩证法来探讨如何将人工智能与人类智能的互动解释为一种复杂的跨文化知识创造(KC)系统,从而为跨国界的人道主义救援提供更有效的决策。研究结果基于实验信息和逻辑推理,作者首先确定了人工智能与人机交互合作中的三个关键跨文化挑战:构建跨文化知识创造系统的悖论、人工智能与人机交互在道德判断中的整合悖论以及人工智能与人机交互合作中用情感处理道德相关信息的悖论。然后,作者运用阴阳辩证法解释了 Klir 的认识论框架(1993 年),提出了一个非常规的跨文化 KC 分层系统,用于理解跨文化人道主义物流中的人工智能-人机交互综合决策。 本文不仅有助于深入理解跨境人道主义物流背景下由人类情感和文化认知产生的复杂问题,还能帮助不同文化背景的利益相关者有效地应对这些挑战及其潜在影响。原创性/价值原创性在于使用阴阳辩证法的认知方法来隐喻国际人道主义物流中人工智能与人道智能整合 KC 的动态起源。本文以系统科学和知识管理为基础,运用博弈论、多目标优化和马尔可夫决策过程,在跨文化人道主义物流的背景下实现了概念框架的可操作性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Combining artificial and human intelligence to manage cross-cultural knowledge in humanitarian logistics: a Yin–Yang dialectic systems view of knowledge creation

Purpose

Aiming to resolve cross-cultural paradoxes in combining artificial intelligence (AI) with human intelligence (HI) for international humanitarian logistics, this paper aims to adopt an unorthodox Yin–Yang dialectic approach to address how AI–HI interactions can be interpreted as a sophisticated cross-cultural knowledge creation (KC) system that enables more effective decision-making for providing humanitarian relief across borders.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper is conceptual and pragmatic in nature, whereas its structure design follows the requirements of a real impact study.

Findings

Based on experimental information and logical reasoning, the authors first identify three critical cross-cultural challenges in AI–HI collaboration: paradoxes of building a cross-cultural KC system, paradoxes of integrative AI and HI in moral judgement and paradoxes of processing moral-related information with emotions in AI–HI collaboration. Then applying the Yin–Yang dialectic to interpret Klir’s epistemological frame (1993), the authors propose an unconventional stratified system of cross-cultural KC for understanding integrative AI–HI decision-making for humanitarian logistics across cultures.

Practical implications

This paper aids not only in deeply understanding complex issues stemming from human emotions and cultural cognitions in the context of cross-border humanitarian logistics, but also equips culturally-diverse stakeholders to effectively navigate these challenges and their potential ramifications. It enhances the decision-making process and optimizes the synergy between AI and HI for cross-cultural humanitarian logistics.

Originality/value

The originality lies in the use of a cognitive methodology of the Yin–Yang dialectic to metaphorize the dynamic genesis of integrative AI-HI KC for international humanitarian logistics. Based on system science and knowledge management, this paper applies game theory, multi-objective optimization and Markov decision process to operationalize the conceptual framework in the context of cross-cultural humanitarian logistics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
15.70%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: Knowledge Management covers all the key issues in its field including: ■Developing an appropriate culture and communication strategy ■Integrating learning and knowledge infrastructure ■Knowledge management and the learning organization ■Information organization and retrieval technologies for improving the quality of knowledge ■Linking knowledge management to performance initiatives ■Retaining knowledge - human and intellectual capital ■Using information technology to develop knowledge management ■Knowledge management and innovation ■Measuring the value of knowledge already within an organization ■What lies beyond knowledge management?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信