评估在线自适应磁共振引导放疗的临床并行工作流程:治疗疗程时间的详细评估

Q1 Nursing
Claudio Votta , Sara Iacovone , Gabriele Turco , Valerio Carrozzo , Marica Vagni , Aurora Scalia , Giuditta Chiloiro , Guenda Meffe , Matteo Nardini , Giulia Panza , Lorenzo Placidi , Angela Romano , Patrizia Cornacchione , Maria Antonietta Gambacorta , Luca Boldrini
{"title":"评估在线自适应磁共振引导放疗的临床并行工作流程:治疗疗程时间的详细评估","authors":"Claudio Votta ,&nbsp;Sara Iacovone ,&nbsp;Gabriele Turco ,&nbsp;Valerio Carrozzo ,&nbsp;Marica Vagni ,&nbsp;Aurora Scalia ,&nbsp;Giuditta Chiloiro ,&nbsp;Guenda Meffe ,&nbsp;Matteo Nardini ,&nbsp;Giulia Panza ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Placidi ,&nbsp;Angela Romano ,&nbsp;Patrizia Cornacchione ,&nbsp;Maria Antonietta Gambacorta ,&nbsp;Luca Boldrini","doi":"10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Advancements in MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) enable clinical parallel workflows (CPW) for online adaptive planning (oART), allowing medical physicists (MPs), physicians (MDs), and radiation therapists (RTTs) to perform their tasks simultaneously. This study evaluates the impact of this upgrade on the total treatment time by analyzing each step of the current 0.35T-MRgRT workflow.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The time process of the workflow steps for 254 treatment fractions in 0.35 MRgRT was examined. Patients have been grouped based on disease site, breathing modality (BM) (BHI or FB), and fractionation (stereotactic body RT [SBRT] or standard fractionated long course [LC]). The time spent for the following workflow steps in Adaptive Treatment (ADP) was analyzed: Patient Setup Time (PSt), MRI Acquisition and Matching (MRt), MR Re-contouring Time (RCt), Re-Planning Time (RPt), Treatment Delivery Time (TDt). Also analyzed was the timing of treatments that followed a Simple workflow (SMP), without the online re-planning (PSt + MRt + TDt.).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The time analysis revealed that the ADP workflow (median: 34 min) is significantly (p &lt; 0.05) longer than the SMP workflow (19 min). The time required for ADP treatments is significantly influenced by TDt, constituting 40 % of the total time. The oART steps (RCt + RPt) took 11 min (median), representing 27 % of the entire procedure. Overall, 79.2 % of oART fractions were completed in less than 45 min, and 30.6 % were completed in less than 30 min.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This preliminary analysis, along with the comparative assessment against existing literature, underscores the potential of CPW to diminish the overall treatment duration in MRgRT-oART. Additionally, it suggests the potential for CPW to promote a more integrated multidisciplinary approach in the execution of oART.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36328,"journal":{"name":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000064/pdfft?md5=0c2b643d3bd934625d7fb6a271b2d272&pid=1-s2.0-S2405632424000064-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of clinical parallel workflow in online adaptive MR-guided Radiotherapy: A detailed assessment of treatment session times\",\"authors\":\"Claudio Votta ,&nbsp;Sara Iacovone ,&nbsp;Gabriele Turco ,&nbsp;Valerio Carrozzo ,&nbsp;Marica Vagni ,&nbsp;Aurora Scalia ,&nbsp;Giuditta Chiloiro ,&nbsp;Guenda Meffe ,&nbsp;Matteo Nardini ,&nbsp;Giulia Panza ,&nbsp;Lorenzo Placidi ,&nbsp;Angela Romano ,&nbsp;Patrizia Cornacchione ,&nbsp;Maria Antonietta Gambacorta ,&nbsp;Luca Boldrini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tipsro.2024.100239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Advancements in MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) enable clinical parallel workflows (CPW) for online adaptive planning (oART), allowing medical physicists (MPs), physicians (MDs), and radiation therapists (RTTs) to perform their tasks simultaneously. This study evaluates the impact of this upgrade on the total treatment time by analyzing each step of the current 0.35T-MRgRT workflow.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The time process of the workflow steps for 254 treatment fractions in 0.35 MRgRT was examined. Patients have been grouped based on disease site, breathing modality (BM) (BHI or FB), and fractionation (stereotactic body RT [SBRT] or standard fractionated long course [LC]). The time spent for the following workflow steps in Adaptive Treatment (ADP) was analyzed: Patient Setup Time (PSt), MRI Acquisition and Matching (MRt), MR Re-contouring Time (RCt), Re-Planning Time (RPt), Treatment Delivery Time (TDt). Also analyzed was the timing of treatments that followed a Simple workflow (SMP), without the online re-planning (PSt + MRt + TDt.).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The time analysis revealed that the ADP workflow (median: 34 min) is significantly (p &lt; 0.05) longer than the SMP workflow (19 min). The time required for ADP treatments is significantly influenced by TDt, constituting 40 % of the total time. The oART steps (RCt + RPt) took 11 min (median), representing 27 % of the entire procedure. Overall, 79.2 % of oART fractions were completed in less than 45 min, and 30.6 % were completed in less than 30 min.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This preliminary analysis, along with the comparative assessment against existing literature, underscores the potential of CPW to diminish the overall treatment duration in MRgRT-oART. Additionally, it suggests the potential for CPW to promote a more integrated multidisciplinary approach in the execution of oART.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36328,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000064/pdfft?md5=0c2b643d3bd934625d7fb6a271b2d272&pid=1-s2.0-S2405632424000064-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000064\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405632424000064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:磁共振成像引导放射治疗(MRgRT)的先进技术实现了在线自适应计划(oART)的临床并行工作流(CPW),使医学物理师(MP)、内科医生(MD)和放射治疗师(RTT)能够同时完成他们的任务。本研究通过分析当前 0.35T MRgRT 工作流程的每个步骤,评估了这一升级对总治疗时间的影响。根据疾病部位、呼吸方式(BM)(BHI 或 FB)和分段(立体定向体部 RT [SBRT] 或标准分段长程 RT [LC])对患者进行分组。对自适应治疗(ADP)中以下工作流程步骤所花费的时间进行了分析:患者设置时间 (PSt)、核磁共振成像采集和匹配时间 (MRt)、核磁共振成像重新构图时间 (RCt)、重新规划时间 (RPt)、治疗实施时间 (TDt)。结果时间分析表明,ADP 工作流程(中位数:34 分钟)明显(p < 0.05)长于 SMP 工作流程(19 分钟)。ADP 处理所需时间受 TDt 影响很大,占总时间的 40%。oART 步骤(RCt + RPt)耗时 11 分钟(中位数),占整个流程的 27%。总体而言,79.2% 的 oART 分段在 45 分钟内完成,30.6% 的分段在 30 分钟内完成。结论这项初步分析以及与现有文献的比较评估强调了 CPW 在缩短 MRgRT-oART 整体治疗时间方面的潜力。此外,它还表明 CPW 有可能促进在实施 oART 时采用更加综合的多学科方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of clinical parallel workflow in online adaptive MR-guided Radiotherapy: A detailed assessment of treatment session times

Introduction

Advancements in MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) enable clinical parallel workflows (CPW) for online adaptive planning (oART), allowing medical physicists (MPs), physicians (MDs), and radiation therapists (RTTs) to perform their tasks simultaneously. This study evaluates the impact of this upgrade on the total treatment time by analyzing each step of the current 0.35T-MRgRT workflow.

Methods

The time process of the workflow steps for 254 treatment fractions in 0.35 MRgRT was examined. Patients have been grouped based on disease site, breathing modality (BM) (BHI or FB), and fractionation (stereotactic body RT [SBRT] or standard fractionated long course [LC]). The time spent for the following workflow steps in Adaptive Treatment (ADP) was analyzed: Patient Setup Time (PSt), MRI Acquisition and Matching (MRt), MR Re-contouring Time (RCt), Re-Planning Time (RPt), Treatment Delivery Time (TDt). Also analyzed was the timing of treatments that followed a Simple workflow (SMP), without the online re-planning (PSt + MRt + TDt.).

Results

The time analysis revealed that the ADP workflow (median: 34 min) is significantly (p < 0.05) longer than the SMP workflow (19 min). The time required for ADP treatments is significantly influenced by TDt, constituting 40 % of the total time. The oART steps (RCt + RPt) took 11 min (median), representing 27 % of the entire procedure. Overall, 79.2 % of oART fractions were completed in less than 45 min, and 30.6 % were completed in less than 30 min.

Conclusion

This preliminary analysis, along with the comparative assessment against existing literature, underscores the potential of CPW to diminish the overall treatment duration in MRgRT-oART. Additionally, it suggests the potential for CPW to promote a more integrated multidisciplinary approach in the execution of oART.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
67 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信