倡导可推广性:接受动物研究成果转化中固有的变异性。

IF 8.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
F C Hankenson, E M Prager, B R Berridge
{"title":"倡导可推广性:接受动物研究成果转化中固有的变异性。","authors":"F C Hankenson, E M Prager, B R Berridge","doi":"10.1146/annurev-animal-021022-043531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advancing scientific discovery requires investigators to embrace research practices that increase transparency and disclosure about materials, methods, and outcomes. Several research advocacy and funding organizations have produced guidelines and recommended practices to enhance reproducibility through detailed and rigorous research approaches; however, confusion around vocabulary terms and a lack of adoption of suggested practices have stymied successful implementation. Although reproducibility of research findings cannot be guaranteed due to extensive inherent variables in attempts at experimental repetition, the scientific community can advocate for generalizability in the application of data outcomes to ensure a broad and effective impact on the comparison of animals to translation within human research. This report reviews suggestions, based upon work with National Institutes of Health advisory groups, for improving rigor and transparency in animal research through aspects of experimental design, statistical assessment, and reporting factors to advocate for generalizability in the application of comparative outcomes between animals and humans.</p>","PeriodicalId":48953,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Animal Biosciences","volume":"12 ","pages":"391-410"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advocating for Generalizability: Accepting Inherent Variability in Translation of Animal Research Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"F C Hankenson, E M Prager, B R Berridge\",\"doi\":\"10.1146/annurev-animal-021022-043531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Advancing scientific discovery requires investigators to embrace research practices that increase transparency and disclosure about materials, methods, and outcomes. Several research advocacy and funding organizations have produced guidelines and recommended practices to enhance reproducibility through detailed and rigorous research approaches; however, confusion around vocabulary terms and a lack of adoption of suggested practices have stymied successful implementation. Although reproducibility of research findings cannot be guaranteed due to extensive inherent variables in attempts at experimental repetition, the scientific community can advocate for generalizability in the application of data outcomes to ensure a broad and effective impact on the comparison of animals to translation within human research. This report reviews suggestions, based upon work with National Institutes of Health advisory groups, for improving rigor and transparency in animal research through aspects of experimental design, statistical assessment, and reporting factors to advocate for generalizability in the application of comparative outcomes between animals and humans.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Review of Animal Biosciences\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"391-410\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Review of Animal Biosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-021022-043531\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Animal Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-animal-021022-043531","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

要推动科学发现,研究人员就必须采取研究措施,提高材料、方法和结果的透明度和公开性。一些研究倡导和资助组织已经制定了指南和建议实践,通过详细而严格的研究方法来提高可重复性;然而,词汇的混淆和建议实践的缺乏阻碍了成功实施。尽管由于实验重复尝试中存在大量固有变量,研究结果的可重复性无法得到保证,但科学界可以倡导在应用数据结果时要具有普遍性,以确保在人类研究中对动物与转化的比较产生广泛而有效的影响。本报告在与美国国立卫生研究院顾问小组合作的基础上,回顾了通过实验设计、统计评估和报告因素等方面提高动物研究严谨性和透明度的建议,以倡导在应用动物和人类比较结果时的可推广性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advocating for Generalizability: Accepting Inherent Variability in Translation of Animal Research Outcomes.

Advancing scientific discovery requires investigators to embrace research practices that increase transparency and disclosure about materials, methods, and outcomes. Several research advocacy and funding organizations have produced guidelines and recommended practices to enhance reproducibility through detailed and rigorous research approaches; however, confusion around vocabulary terms and a lack of adoption of suggested practices have stymied successful implementation. Although reproducibility of research findings cannot be guaranteed due to extensive inherent variables in attempts at experimental repetition, the scientific community can advocate for generalizability in the application of data outcomes to ensure a broad and effective impact on the comparison of animals to translation within human research. This report reviews suggestions, based upon work with National Institutes of Health advisory groups, for improving rigor and transparency in animal research through aspects of experimental design, statistical assessment, and reporting factors to advocate for generalizability in the application of comparative outcomes between animals and humans.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annual Review of Animal Biosciences
Annual Review of Animal Biosciences BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY-ZOOLOGY
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
0.80%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Annual Review of Animal Biosciences is primarily dedicated to the fields of biotechnology, genetics, genomics, and breeding, with a special focus on veterinary medicine. This includes veterinary pathobiology, infectious diseases and vaccine development, and conservation and zoo biology. The publication aims to address the needs of scientists studying both wild and domesticated animal species, veterinarians, conservation biologists, and geneticists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信