为什么火烈鸟被命名为鹈鹕,芦笋被命名为芹菜?了解快速图片命名任务中目标与错误之间的关系。

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Cognitive Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-13 DOI:10.1080/02643294.2024.2315822
Leonie F Lampe, Maria Zarifyan, Solène Hameau, Lyndsey Nickels
{"title":"为什么火烈鸟被命名为鹈鹕,芦笋被命名为芹菜?了解快速图片命名任务中目标与错误之间的关系。","authors":"Leonie F Lampe, Maria Zarifyan, Solène Hameau, Lyndsey Nickels","doi":"10.1080/02643294.2024.2315822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Speakers sometimes make word production errors, such as mistakenly saying <i>pelican</i> instead of flamingo. This study explored which properties of an error influence the likelihood of its selection over the target word. Analysing real-word errors in speeded picture naming, we investigated whether, relative to the target, naming errors were more typical representatives of the semantic category, were associated with more semantic features, and/or were semantically more closely related to the target than its near semantic neighbours were on average. Results indicated that naming errors tended to be more typical category representatives and possess more semantic features than the targets. Moreover, while not being the closest semantic neighbours, errors were largely near semantic neighbours of the targets. These findings suggest that typicality, number of semantic features, and semantic similarity govern activation levels in the production system, and we discuss possible mechanisms underlying these effects in the context of word production theories.</p>","PeriodicalId":50670,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuropsychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why is a <i>flamingo</i> named as <i>pelican</i> and <i>asparagus</i> as <i>celery</i>? Understanding the relationship between targets and errors in a speeded picture naming task.\",\"authors\":\"Leonie F Lampe, Maria Zarifyan, Solène Hameau, Lyndsey Nickels\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02643294.2024.2315822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Speakers sometimes make word production errors, such as mistakenly saying <i>pelican</i> instead of flamingo. This study explored which properties of an error influence the likelihood of its selection over the target word. Analysing real-word errors in speeded picture naming, we investigated whether, relative to the target, naming errors were more typical representatives of the semantic category, were associated with more semantic features, and/or were semantically more closely related to the target than its near semantic neighbours were on average. Results indicated that naming errors tended to be more typical category representatives and possess more semantic features than the targets. Moreover, while not being the closest semantic neighbours, errors were largely near semantic neighbours of the targets. These findings suggest that typicality, number of semantic features, and semantic similarity govern activation levels in the production system, and we discuss possible mechanisms underlying these effects in the context of word production theories.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Neuropsychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Neuropsychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2024.2315822\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2024.2315822","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

说话者有时会出现造词错误,例如误将鹈鹕(pelican)说成火烈鸟(flamingo)。本研究探讨了错误的哪些特性会影响选择目标词的可能性。通过分析加速图片命名中的实词错误,我们研究了相对于目标词而言,命名错误是否是语义类别中更典型的代表,是否与更多的语义特征相关联,以及/或者是否在语义上比其近邻语义平均更接近目标词。结果表明,与目标语相比,命名错误往往是更典型的类别代表,并具有更多的语义特征。此外,错误虽然不是最近的语义邻居,但在很大程度上是目标的近语义邻居。这些研究结果表明,典型性、语义特征数量和语义相似性制约着生成系统的激活水平,我们将结合词语生成理论讨论这些效应的可能机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why is a flamingo named as pelican and asparagus as celery? Understanding the relationship between targets and errors in a speeded picture naming task.

Speakers sometimes make word production errors, such as mistakenly saying pelican instead of flamingo. This study explored which properties of an error influence the likelihood of its selection over the target word. Analysing real-word errors in speeded picture naming, we investigated whether, relative to the target, naming errors were more typical representatives of the semantic category, were associated with more semantic features, and/or were semantically more closely related to the target than its near semantic neighbours were on average. Results indicated that naming errors tended to be more typical category representatives and possess more semantic features than the targets. Moreover, while not being the closest semantic neighbours, errors were largely near semantic neighbours of the targets. These findings suggest that typicality, number of semantic features, and semantic similarity govern activation levels in the production system, and we discuss possible mechanisms underlying these effects in the context of word production theories.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Neuropsychology
Cognitive Neuropsychology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
23
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuropsychology is of interest to cognitive scientists and neuroscientists, neuropsychologists, neurologists, psycholinguists, speech pathologists, physiotherapists, and psychiatrists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信