造口患者术后远端肠管再喂养:临床结果对比分析。

Jignesh Gandhi, Aadrika Kashyap, Pravin Shinde
{"title":"造口患者术后远端肠管再喂养:临床结果对比分析。","authors":"Jignesh Gandhi, Aadrika Kashyap, Pravin Shinde","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0053.9351","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>&lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; Stoma surgery, which involves creating a diversion of the small intestine through an abdominal wall opening, poses challenges in managing fluid and electrolyte imbalances. Patients with high proximal stoma often rely on costly and risky parenteral nutrition (PN). Distal enteral tube feeding, a method of delivering nutrition to the small intestine, is intended to improve clinical outcomes and reduce complications. This study presents a comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between postoperative distal enteral tube refeeding and traditional enteral and PN approaches in stoma patients with distal mucous fistula.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Aim:&lt;/b&gt; To evaluate the effectiveness of distal enteral tube refeeding in improving postoperative outcomes after stoma surgery and to examine the impact of distal enteral tube refeeding on total hospitalization stay, ICU length of stay, TPN duration, and time to closure of the stoma.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Material and methods:&lt;/b&gt; The study is a retrospective, single-center trial involving 84 patients who had undergone stoma surgery. The patients were divided into two groups: those receiving postoperative distal enteral tube refeeding (n = 42) and the control group (n = 42), with standard mucous fistula creation. The data was collected retrospectively from January 2012 to January 2022 and the statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, the chi-square test, and the t-test.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; The results of our study show that the patients who had undergone postoperative distal enteral tube refeeding had a significantly shorter total hospitalization stay (p = 0.0002), a significantly shorter ICU length of stay (p = 0.0006), a significantly shorter TPN duration (p= 0.0004), and a significantly faster time to closure (p = 0.0002).&lt;/br&gt.</p>","PeriodicalId":501107,"journal":{"name":"Polski przeglad chirurgiczny","volume":"96 0","pages":"26-29"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative Distal Enteral Tube Refeeding in Stoma Patients: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Jignesh Gandhi, Aadrika Kashyap, Pravin Shinde\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0053.9351\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>&lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; Stoma surgery, which involves creating a diversion of the small intestine through an abdominal wall opening, poses challenges in managing fluid and electrolyte imbalances. Patients with high proximal stoma often rely on costly and risky parenteral nutrition (PN). Distal enteral tube feeding, a method of delivering nutrition to the small intestine, is intended to improve clinical outcomes and reduce complications. This study presents a comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between postoperative distal enteral tube refeeding and traditional enteral and PN approaches in stoma patients with distal mucous fistula.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Aim:&lt;/b&gt; To evaluate the effectiveness of distal enteral tube refeeding in improving postoperative outcomes after stoma surgery and to examine the impact of distal enteral tube refeeding on total hospitalization stay, ICU length of stay, TPN duration, and time to closure of the stoma.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Material and methods:&lt;/b&gt; The study is a retrospective, single-center trial involving 84 patients who had undergone stoma surgery. The patients were divided into two groups: those receiving postoperative distal enteral tube refeeding (n = 42) and the control group (n = 42), with standard mucous fistula creation. The data was collected retrospectively from January 2012 to January 2022 and the statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, the chi-square test, and the t-test.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; The results of our study show that the patients who had undergone postoperative distal enteral tube refeeding had a significantly shorter total hospitalization stay (p = 0.0002), a significantly shorter ICU length of stay (p = 0.0006), a significantly shorter TPN duration (p= 0.0004), and a significantly faster time to closure (p = 0.0002).&lt;/br&gt.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polski przeglad chirurgiczny\",\"volume\":\"96 0\",\"pages\":\"26-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polski przeglad chirurgiczny\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.9351\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polski przeglad chirurgiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0053.9351","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

<b><br>引言:</b> 造口手术涉及通过腹壁开口将小肠改道,给液体和电解质失衡的管理带来了挑战。高位造口患者通常需要依赖昂贵且高风险的肠外营养(PN)。远端肠管喂养是一种向小肠输送营养的方法,旨在改善临床效果并减少并发症。本研究对患有远端粘液瘘的造口患者术后远端肠管再喂养与传统肠内和肠外营养方法的临床疗效进行了比较分析。</br><b><br>材料和方法:</b>该研究是一项回顾性单中心试验,涉及 84 名接受造口手术的患者。患者分为两组:术后接受远端肠管再喂养组(42 人)和对照组(42 人),对照组采用标准粘液造瘘术。数据收集时间为 2012 年 1 月至 2022 年 1 月,采用描述性统计、卡方检验和 t 检验进行统计分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Postoperative Distal Enteral Tube Refeeding in Stoma Patients: A Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcomes.

<b><br>Introduction:</b> Stoma surgery, which involves creating a diversion of the small intestine through an abdominal wall opening, poses challenges in managing fluid and electrolyte imbalances. Patients with high proximal stoma often rely on costly and risky parenteral nutrition (PN). Distal enteral tube feeding, a method of delivering nutrition to the small intestine, is intended to improve clinical outcomes and reduce complications. This study presents a comparative analysis of clinical outcomes between postoperative distal enteral tube refeeding and traditional enteral and PN approaches in stoma patients with distal mucous fistula.</br> <b><br>Aim:</b> To evaluate the effectiveness of distal enteral tube refeeding in improving postoperative outcomes after stoma surgery and to examine the impact of distal enteral tube refeeding on total hospitalization stay, ICU length of stay, TPN duration, and time to closure of the stoma.</br> <b><br>Material and methods:</b> The study is a retrospective, single-center trial involving 84 patients who had undergone stoma surgery. The patients were divided into two groups: those receiving postoperative distal enteral tube refeeding (n = 42) and the control group (n = 42), with standard mucous fistula creation. The data was collected retrospectively from January 2012 to January 2022 and the statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, the chi-square test, and the t-test.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> The results of our study show that the patients who had undergone postoperative distal enteral tube refeeding had a significantly shorter total hospitalization stay (p = 0.0002), a significantly shorter ICU length of stay (p = 0.0006), a significantly shorter TPN duration (p= 0.0004), and a significantly faster time to closure (p = 0.0002).</br>.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信