质子密度脂肪分数在 0-100% 全动态范围内的线性和偏差:在两个地点使用 1.5T 和 3T MRI 进行的多平台、多供应商模型研究。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Houchun H Hu, Henry Szu-Meng Chen, Diego Hernando
{"title":"质子密度脂肪分数在 0-100% 全动态范围内的线性和偏差:在两个地点使用 1.5T 和 3T MRI 进行的多平台、多供应商模型研究。","authors":"Houchun H Hu, Henry Szu-Meng Chen, Diego Hernando","doi":"10.1007/s10334-024-01148-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Performance assessments of quantitative determinations of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) have largely focused on the range between 0 and 50%. We evaluate PDFF in a two-site phantom study across the full 0-100% PDFF range.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We used commercially available 3D chemical-shift-encoded water-fat MRI sequences from three MRI system vendors at 1.5T and 3T and conducted the study across two sites. A spherical phantom housing 18 vials spanning the full 0-100% PDFF range was used. Data at each site were acquired using default parameters to determine same-day and different-day intra-scanner repeatability, and inter-system and inter-site reproducibility, in addition to linear regression between reference and measured PDFF values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all systems, results demonstrated strong linearity and minimal bias. For 1.5T systems, a pooled slope of 0.99 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.981-0.997 and a pooled intercept of 0.61% PDFF with a 95% CI of 0.17-1.04 were obtained. Results for pooled 3T data included a slope of 1.00 (95% CI 0.995-1.005) and an intercept of 0.69% PDFF (95% CI 0.39-0.97). Inter-site and inter-system reproducibility coefficients ranged from 2.9 to 6.2 (in units of PDFF), while intra-scanner same-day and different-day repeatability ranged from 0.6 to 7.8.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>PDFF across the 0-100% range can be reliably estimated using current commercial offerings at 1.5T and 3T.</p>","PeriodicalId":18067,"journal":{"name":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"551-563"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linearity and bias of proton density fat fraction across the full dynamic range of 0-100%: a multiplatform, multivendor phantom study using 1.5T and 3T MRI at two sites.\",\"authors\":\"Houchun H Hu, Henry Szu-Meng Chen, Diego Hernando\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10334-024-01148-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Performance assessments of quantitative determinations of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) have largely focused on the range between 0 and 50%. We evaluate PDFF in a two-site phantom study across the full 0-100% PDFF range.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We used commercially available 3D chemical-shift-encoded water-fat MRI sequences from three MRI system vendors at 1.5T and 3T and conducted the study across two sites. A spherical phantom housing 18 vials spanning the full 0-100% PDFF range was used. Data at each site were acquired using default parameters to determine same-day and different-day intra-scanner repeatability, and inter-system and inter-site reproducibility, in addition to linear regression between reference and measured PDFF values.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all systems, results demonstrated strong linearity and minimal bias. For 1.5T systems, a pooled slope of 0.99 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.981-0.997 and a pooled intercept of 0.61% PDFF with a 95% CI of 0.17-1.04 were obtained. Results for pooled 3T data included a slope of 1.00 (95% CI 0.995-1.005) and an intercept of 0.69% PDFF (95% CI 0.39-0.97). Inter-site and inter-system reproducibility coefficients ranged from 2.9 to 6.2 (in units of PDFF), while intra-scanner same-day and different-day repeatability ranged from 0.6 to 7.8.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>PDFF across the 0-100% range can be reliably estimated using current commercial offerings at 1.5T and 3T.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"551-563\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11428149/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-024-01148-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/2/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10334-024-01148-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/2/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:质子密度脂肪分数(PDFF)定量测定的性能评估主要集中在 0% 到 50% 的范围内。我们在一项两站模型研究中评估了 0-100% PDFF 范围内的质子密度脂肪分数:我们使用了三家核磁共振成像系统供应商在 1.5T 和 3T 下提供的商用三维化学位移编码水-脂肪核磁共振成像序列,并在两个部位进行了研究。研究使用了一个容纳 18 个小瓶的球形模型,涵盖了整个 0-100% PDFF 范围。使用默认参数采集每个站点的数据,以确定同一天和不同天扫描仪内的可重复性、系统间和站点间的可重复性,以及参考值和测量的 PDFF 值之间的线性回归:在所有系统中,结果均显示出较强的线性和最小的偏差。对于 1.5T 系统,汇总斜率为 0.99,95% 置信区间 (CI) 为 0.981-0.997;汇总截距为 0.61% PDFF,95% 置信区间 (CI) 为 0.17-1.04。汇总 3T 数据的结果包括斜率 1.00(95% CI 0.995-1.005)和截距 0.69% PDFF(95% CI 0.39-0.97)。站点间和系统间的可重复性系数介于 2.9 到 6.2 之间(以 PDFF 为单位),而扫描仪内的同日和异日可重复性介于 0.6 到 7.8 之间:在 1.5T 和 3T 下,使用目前的商业产品可以可靠地估算出 0-100% 范围内的 PDFF。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Linearity and bias of proton density fat fraction across the full dynamic range of 0-100%: a multiplatform, multivendor phantom study using 1.5T and 3T MRI at two sites.

Objective: Performance assessments of quantitative determinations of proton density fat fraction (PDFF) have largely focused on the range between 0 and 50%. We evaluate PDFF in a two-site phantom study across the full 0-100% PDFF range.

Materials and methods: We used commercially available 3D chemical-shift-encoded water-fat MRI sequences from three MRI system vendors at 1.5T and 3T and conducted the study across two sites. A spherical phantom housing 18 vials spanning the full 0-100% PDFF range was used. Data at each site were acquired using default parameters to determine same-day and different-day intra-scanner repeatability, and inter-system and inter-site reproducibility, in addition to linear regression between reference and measured PDFF values.

Results: Across all systems, results demonstrated strong linearity and minimal bias. For 1.5T systems, a pooled slope of 0.99 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 0.981-0.997 and a pooled intercept of 0.61% PDFF with a 95% CI of 0.17-1.04 were obtained. Results for pooled 3T data included a slope of 1.00 (95% CI 0.995-1.005) and an intercept of 0.69% PDFF (95% CI 0.39-0.97). Inter-site and inter-system reproducibility coefficients ranged from 2.9 to 6.2 (in units of PDFF), while intra-scanner same-day and different-day repeatability ranged from 0.6 to 7.8.

Discussion: PDFF across the 0-100% range can be reliably estimated using current commercial offerings at 1.5T and 3T.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: MAGMA is a multidisciplinary international journal devoted to the publication of articles on all aspects of magnetic resonance techniques and their applications in medicine and biology. MAGMA currently publishes research papers, reviews, letters to the editor, and commentaries, six times a year. The subject areas covered by MAGMA include: advances in materials, hardware and software in magnetic resonance technology, new developments and results in research and practical applications of magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy related to biology and medicine, study of animal models and intact cells using magnetic resonance, reports of clinical trials on humans and clinical validation of magnetic resonance protocols.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信