关于荧光显微镜中计算皮尔逊相关系数的像素选择标准。

IF 1.5 4区 工程技术 Q3 MICROSCOPY
Sergio G Lopez, Sebastian Samwald, Sally Jones, Christine Faulkner
{"title":"关于荧光显微镜中计算皮尔逊相关系数的像素选择标准。","authors":"Sergio G Lopez, Sebastian Samwald, Sally Jones, Christine Faulkner","doi":"10.1111/jmi.13273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Colocalisation microscopy analysis provides an intuitive and straightforward way of determining if two biomolecules occupy the same diffraction-limited volume. A popular colocalisation coefficient, the Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC), can be calculated using different pixel selection criteria: PCC<sub>ALL</sub> includes all image pixels, PCC<sub>OR</sub> only pixels exceeding the intensity thresholds for either one of the detection channels, and PCC<sub>AND</sub> only pixels exceeding the intensity thresholds for both detection channels. Our results show that PCC<sub>ALL</sub> depends on the foreground to background ratio, producing values influenced by factors unrelated to biomolecular association. PCC<sub>AND</sub> focuses on areas with the highest intensities in both channels, which allows it to detect low levels of colocalisation, but makes it inappropriate for evaluating spatial cooccurrence between the signals. PCC<sub>OR</sub> produces values influenced both by signal proportionality and spatial cooccurrence but can sometimes overemphasise the lack of the latter. Overall, PCC<sub>AND</sub> excels at detecting low levels of colocalisation, PCC<sub>OR</sub> provides a balanced quantification of signal proportionality and spatial coincidence, and PCC<sub>ALL</sub> risks misinterpretation yet avoids segmentation challenges. Awareness of their distinct properties should inform their appropriate application with the aim of accurately representing the underlying biology.</p>","PeriodicalId":16484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of microscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the pixel selection criterion for the calculation of the Pearson's correlation coefficient in fluorescence microscopy.\",\"authors\":\"Sergio G Lopez, Sebastian Samwald, Sally Jones, Christine Faulkner\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jmi.13273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Colocalisation microscopy analysis provides an intuitive and straightforward way of determining if two biomolecules occupy the same diffraction-limited volume. A popular colocalisation coefficient, the Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC), can be calculated using different pixel selection criteria: PCC<sub>ALL</sub> includes all image pixels, PCC<sub>OR</sub> only pixels exceeding the intensity thresholds for either one of the detection channels, and PCC<sub>AND</sub> only pixels exceeding the intensity thresholds for both detection channels. Our results show that PCC<sub>ALL</sub> depends on the foreground to background ratio, producing values influenced by factors unrelated to biomolecular association. PCC<sub>AND</sub> focuses on areas with the highest intensities in both channels, which allows it to detect low levels of colocalisation, but makes it inappropriate for evaluating spatial cooccurrence between the signals. PCC<sub>OR</sub> produces values influenced both by signal proportionality and spatial cooccurrence but can sometimes overemphasise the lack of the latter. Overall, PCC<sub>AND</sub> excels at detecting low levels of colocalisation, PCC<sub>OR</sub> provides a balanced quantification of signal proportionality and spatial coincidence, and PCC<sub>ALL</sub> risks misinterpretation yet avoids segmentation challenges. Awareness of their distinct properties should inform their appropriate application with the aim of accurately representing the underlying biology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16484,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of microscopy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of microscopy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.13273\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROSCOPY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of microscopy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jmi.13273","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROSCOPY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

共聚焦显微镜分析为确定两种生物分子是否占据相同的衍射极限体积提供了一种直观而简单的方法。一种常用的共聚焦系数--皮尔逊相关系数(PCC)--可以通过不同的像素选择标准来计算:PCCALL 包括所有图像像素,PCCOR 仅包括超过任一检测通道强度阈值的像素,而 PCCAND 仅包括超过两个检测通道强度阈值的像素。我们的结果表明,PCCALL 取决于前景与背景的比例,其产生的值受与生物分子关联无关的因素影响。PCCAND 专注于两个通道中强度最高的区域,这使其能够检测到低水平的共聚焦,但却不适合评估信号之间的空间共现。PCCOR 产生的值同时受信号比例和空间共现的影响,但有时会过分强调后者的缺乏。总的来说,PCCAND 擅长检测低水平的共聚焦,PCCOR 提供了信号比例性和空间共存性的平衡量化,而 PCCALL 则有被误读的风险,但避免了分割方面的挑战。认识到它们的不同特性后,就可以适当地应用它们,从而准确地反映潜在的生物学特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the pixel selection criterion for the calculation of the Pearson's correlation coefficient in fluorescence microscopy.

Colocalisation microscopy analysis provides an intuitive and straightforward way of determining if two biomolecules occupy the same diffraction-limited volume. A popular colocalisation coefficient, the Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC), can be calculated using different pixel selection criteria: PCCALL includes all image pixels, PCCOR only pixels exceeding the intensity thresholds for either one of the detection channels, and PCCAND only pixels exceeding the intensity thresholds for both detection channels. Our results show that PCCALL depends on the foreground to background ratio, producing values influenced by factors unrelated to biomolecular association. PCCAND focuses on areas with the highest intensities in both channels, which allows it to detect low levels of colocalisation, but makes it inappropriate for evaluating spatial cooccurrence between the signals. PCCOR produces values influenced both by signal proportionality and spatial cooccurrence but can sometimes overemphasise the lack of the latter. Overall, PCCAND excels at detecting low levels of colocalisation, PCCOR provides a balanced quantification of signal proportionality and spatial coincidence, and PCCALL risks misinterpretation yet avoids segmentation challenges. Awareness of their distinct properties should inform their appropriate application with the aim of accurately representing the underlying biology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of microscopy
Journal of microscopy 工程技术-显微镜技术
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Microscopy is the oldest journal dedicated to the science of microscopy and the only peer-reviewed publication of the Royal Microscopical Society. It publishes papers that report on the very latest developments in microscopy such as advances in microscopy techniques or novel areas of application. The Journal does not seek to publish routine applications of microscopy or specimen preparation even though the submission may otherwise have a high scientific merit. The scope covers research in the physical and biological sciences and covers imaging methods using light, electrons, X-rays and other radiations as well as atomic force and near field techniques. Interdisciplinary research is welcome. Papers pertaining to microscopy are also welcomed on optical theory, spectroscopy, novel specimen preparation and manipulation methods and image recording, processing and analysis including dynamic analysis of living specimens. Publication types include full papers, hot topic fast tracked communications and review articles. Authors considering submitting a review article should contact the editorial office first.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信