在遗传咨询中使用性别包容性语言,优化患者护理。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Heather Motiff, Kristina Garcia, Qianqian Zhao, Elizabeth M Petty
{"title":"在遗传咨询中使用性别包容性语言,优化患者护理。","authors":"Heather Motiff, Kristina Garcia, Qianqian Zhao, Elizabeth M Petty","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.1882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Providing welcoming, inclusive, and culturally competent care is essential for genetic counselors (GCs) to serve the needs of all patients, including transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) individuals. Inclusive language creates welcoming healthcare spaces and improves health outcomes for TGNB individuals. Training on gender-affirming healthcare can increase knowledge, comfort, and self-efficacy working with TGNB patients. Using a mixed-method survey, this study assessed 65 GCs' gender-inclusive communication practices and elucidated reasons for discomfort using language to determine how language builds trust and fosters patient-provider relationships, ascertain differences between specialties, and identify potential gaps in education and professional development. This study found that approximately one-third of GCs are comfortable using gender-inclusive language and just over half regularly use it with patients. Most GCs do not share their pronouns or ask patients theirs, which was not correlated with comfort levels or frequency of using gender-inclusive language. There were no significant differences based on specialty. Thematic analysis of open responses revealed GCs used gendered language to promote shared language and for clarity, some mentioning sex assigned at birth was relevant for risk assessment. Most felt the impact of gendered language depended on the patient's perspective. Twenty-five percent noted gendered language was familiar for most patients and 40% recognized negative impacts on TGNB individuals. Most GCs desired more gender-inclusivity training even though >95% had some type previously. Those who had gender-inclusivity training in their genetic counseling program were more comfortable using gender-inclusive language and were more likely to share their pronouns with patients. This study adds to the growing body of literature demonstrating GCs' desire for more gender-inclusivity education and highlights the potential importance of having this education integrated into genetic counseling training programs. GCs should continue to incorporate gender-inclusive language into their practice in concordance with the tenants of the Reciprocal Engagement Model.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of gender-inclusive language in genetic counseling to optimize patient care.\",\"authors\":\"Heather Motiff, Kristina Garcia, Qianqian Zhao, Elizabeth M Petty\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jgc4.1882\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Providing welcoming, inclusive, and culturally competent care is essential for genetic counselors (GCs) to serve the needs of all patients, including transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) individuals. Inclusive language creates welcoming healthcare spaces and improves health outcomes for TGNB individuals. Training on gender-affirming healthcare can increase knowledge, comfort, and self-efficacy working with TGNB patients. Using a mixed-method survey, this study assessed 65 GCs' gender-inclusive communication practices and elucidated reasons for discomfort using language to determine how language builds trust and fosters patient-provider relationships, ascertain differences between specialties, and identify potential gaps in education and professional development. This study found that approximately one-third of GCs are comfortable using gender-inclusive language and just over half regularly use it with patients. Most GCs do not share their pronouns or ask patients theirs, which was not correlated with comfort levels or frequency of using gender-inclusive language. There were no significant differences based on specialty. Thematic analysis of open responses revealed GCs used gendered language to promote shared language and for clarity, some mentioning sex assigned at birth was relevant for risk assessment. Most felt the impact of gendered language depended on the patient's perspective. Twenty-five percent noted gendered language was familiar for most patients and 40% recognized negative impacts on TGNB individuals. Most GCs desired more gender-inclusivity training even though >95% had some type previously. Those who had gender-inclusivity training in their genetic counseling program were more comfortable using gender-inclusive language and were more likely to share their pronouns with patients. This study adds to the growing body of literature demonstrating GCs' desire for more gender-inclusivity education and highlights the potential importance of having this education integrated into genetic counseling training programs. GCs should continue to incorporate gender-inclusive language into their practice in concordance with the tenants of the Reciprocal Engagement Model.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Genetic Counseling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1882\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.1882","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

遗传咨询师(GCs)要满足包括变性人和非二元性(TGNB)个体在内的所有患者的需求,就必须提供热情、包容和具有文化胜任能力的医疗服务。包容性语言可营造温馨的医疗空间,并改善变性人和非二元性(TGNB)个体的健康状况。有关性别肯定医疗保健的培训可以增加与变性人和非二元性患者合作的知识、舒适度和自我效能。本研究采用混合方法调查,评估了 65 名 GCs 的性别包容性沟通实践,并阐明了他们在使用语言时感到不适的原因,以确定语言如何建立信任和促进患者与医疗服务提供者之间的关系,确定不同专业之间的差异,并找出教育和专业发展方面的潜在差距。这项研究发现,大约三分之一的全科医生能够自如地使用性别包容性语言,而经常与患者使用这种语言的全科医生刚刚超过一半。大多数全科医生不分享自己的代词,也不询问病人的代词,这与使用性别包容性语言的舒适度或频率无关。不同专业之间没有明显差异。对公开回答的主题分析表明,全科医生使用性别语言是为了促进共同语言和提高清晰度,其中一些人提到出生时的性别分配与风险评估有关。大多数人认为性别化语言的影响取决于患者的观点。25% 的人指出性别化语言对大多数病人来说都很熟悉,40% 的人认识到性别化语言对 TGNB 个人的负面影响。尽管 95% 以上的 GC 以前接受过某些类型的培训,但大多数 GC 仍希望获得更多的性别包容性培训。那些在遗传咨询项目中接受过性别包容性培训的人更乐于使用性别包容性语言,也更愿意与患者分享他们的代词。越来越多的文献表明,遗传咨询师希望获得更多的性别包容性教育,本研究对这些文献进行了补充,并强调了将性别包容性教育纳入遗传咨询培训计划的潜在重要性。遗传咨询师应继续根据 "互惠参与模式"(Reciprocal Engagement Model)的原则将性别包容性语言纳入其实践中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Use of gender-inclusive language in genetic counseling to optimize patient care.

Providing welcoming, inclusive, and culturally competent care is essential for genetic counselors (GCs) to serve the needs of all patients, including transgender and nonbinary (TGNB) individuals. Inclusive language creates welcoming healthcare spaces and improves health outcomes for TGNB individuals. Training on gender-affirming healthcare can increase knowledge, comfort, and self-efficacy working with TGNB patients. Using a mixed-method survey, this study assessed 65 GCs' gender-inclusive communication practices and elucidated reasons for discomfort using language to determine how language builds trust and fosters patient-provider relationships, ascertain differences between specialties, and identify potential gaps in education and professional development. This study found that approximately one-third of GCs are comfortable using gender-inclusive language and just over half regularly use it with patients. Most GCs do not share their pronouns or ask patients theirs, which was not correlated with comfort levels or frequency of using gender-inclusive language. There were no significant differences based on specialty. Thematic analysis of open responses revealed GCs used gendered language to promote shared language and for clarity, some mentioning sex assigned at birth was relevant for risk assessment. Most felt the impact of gendered language depended on the patient's perspective. Twenty-five percent noted gendered language was familiar for most patients and 40% recognized negative impacts on TGNB individuals. Most GCs desired more gender-inclusivity training even though >95% had some type previously. Those who had gender-inclusivity training in their genetic counseling program were more comfortable using gender-inclusive language and were more likely to share their pronouns with patients. This study adds to the growing body of literature demonstrating GCs' desire for more gender-inclusivity education and highlights the potential importance of having this education integrated into genetic counseling training programs. GCs should continue to incorporate gender-inclusive language into their practice in concordance with the tenants of the Reciprocal Engagement Model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信