体裁分析中的内部一致性:方法回顾和三种测量方法的比较

Minjin Kim, Xixin Qiu, Yuanheng (Arthur) Wang
{"title":"体裁分析中的内部一致性:方法回顾和三种测量方法的比较","authors":"Minjin Kim,&nbsp;Xixin Qiu,&nbsp;Yuanheng (Arthur) Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examines the coding procedures, practices, and measures of interrater agreement (IRA) for conducting rhetorical move analysis. We first systematically reviewed 65 English for Academic Purposes (EAP) genre studies, focusing primarily on their IRA rationales and practices. Based on the review outcome, we explored three IRA measures: percent agreement, Kappa coefficients (κ), and Krippendorff's multi-valued alpha (<em>mv</em>-α) in terms of their suitability for measuring IRA in rhetorical move analysis under different scenarios such as different sample sizes, number of coders, and multivalued coding. Specifically, the three researchers annotated 35 texts from the Corpus of Social Sciences Research Article Introductions (COSSRAI) (Lu et al., 2020) and subsequently compared the potential of the three IRA measures. Drawing on findings of the systematic review and the corpus study, we recommended strategies for ensuring methodological rigors and transparency in annotation and IRA practices for EAP genre analysis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101075,"journal":{"name":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100097"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277276612400003X/pdfft?md5=7ef3bf5885ffbcd33ec8cc08eab6e51f&pid=1-s2.0-S277276612400003X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interrater agreement in genre analysis: A methodological review and a comparison of three measures\",\"authors\":\"Minjin Kim,&nbsp;Xixin Qiu,&nbsp;Yuanheng (Arthur) Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rmal.2024.100097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study examines the coding procedures, practices, and measures of interrater agreement (IRA) for conducting rhetorical move analysis. We first systematically reviewed 65 English for Academic Purposes (EAP) genre studies, focusing primarily on their IRA rationales and practices. Based on the review outcome, we explored three IRA measures: percent agreement, Kappa coefficients (κ), and Krippendorff's multi-valued alpha (<em>mv</em>-α) in terms of their suitability for measuring IRA in rhetorical move analysis under different scenarios such as different sample sizes, number of coders, and multivalued coding. Specifically, the three researchers annotated 35 texts from the Corpus of Social Sciences Research Article Introductions (COSSRAI) (Lu et al., 2020) and subsequently compared the potential of the three IRA measures. Drawing on findings of the systematic review and the corpus study, we recommended strategies for ensuring methodological rigors and transparency in annotation and IRA practices for EAP genre analysis.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100097\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277276612400003X/pdfft?md5=7ef3bf5885ffbcd33ec8cc08eab6e51f&pid=1-s2.0-S277276612400003X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277276612400003X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Methods in Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277276612400003X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了进行修辞动作分析时的编码程序、实践和译者间一致性(IRA)测量方法。首先,我们系统地回顾了 65 项学术英语(EAP)体裁研究,主要关注它们的 IRA 理论和实践。在综述结果的基础上,我们探讨了三种 IRA 测量方法:一致性百分比、卡帕系数(κ)和克里彭多夫多值α(mv-α),以了解它们在不同样本量、编码者人数和多值编码等不同情况下是否适合测量修辞动作分析中的 IRA。具体而言,三位研究人员对社会科学研究文章引言语料库(COSSRAI)(Lu 等人,2020 年)中的 35 篇文本进行了注释,随后比较了三种 IRA 测量方法的潜力。根据系统性综述和语料库研究的结果,我们推荐了一些策略,以确保EAP体裁分析的注释和IRA实践在方法论上的严谨性和透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interrater agreement in genre analysis: A methodological review and a comparison of three measures

This study examines the coding procedures, practices, and measures of interrater agreement (IRA) for conducting rhetorical move analysis. We first systematically reviewed 65 English for Academic Purposes (EAP) genre studies, focusing primarily on their IRA rationales and practices. Based on the review outcome, we explored three IRA measures: percent agreement, Kappa coefficients (κ), and Krippendorff's multi-valued alpha (mv-α) in terms of their suitability for measuring IRA in rhetorical move analysis under different scenarios such as different sample sizes, number of coders, and multivalued coding. Specifically, the three researchers annotated 35 texts from the Corpus of Social Sciences Research Article Introductions (COSSRAI) (Lu et al., 2020) and subsequently compared the potential of the three IRA measures. Drawing on findings of the systematic review and the corpus study, we recommended strategies for ensuring methodological rigors and transparency in annotation and IRA practices for EAP genre analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信