问题解决量表:用于轻松评估临床改善情况的单项工具。

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Grégoire Vitry PhD, Rytis Pakrosnis PhD, Jeffrey B. Jackson PhD, Emmanuelle Gallin, Michael F. Hoyt PhD
{"title":"问题解决量表:用于轻松评估临床改善情况的单项工具。","authors":"Grégoire Vitry PhD,&nbsp;Rytis Pakrosnis PhD,&nbsp;Jeffrey B. Jackson PhD,&nbsp;Emmanuelle Gallin,&nbsp;Michael F. Hoyt PhD","doi":"10.1111/jmft.12690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study describes the development and tests the validity of the Problem Resolution Scale (PRS)—a single-item measure developed by researchers at Systemic Practice Research Network (SYPRENE) for assessing the degree to which the focal problem of therapy is perceived as resolved. Data were collected at termination from 747 clients seen across 18 therapists. Results suggested good construct validity, supported by a strong correlation between client and therapist perceptions as assessed by the PRS (<i>r</i> = 0.71, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Good criterion validity was also supported by strong correlations between client-reported psychological well-being and functioning at termination and both client-reported (<i>r</i> = −0.63; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and therapist-reported (<i>r</i> = −0.66; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) problem resolution scores. Linear mixed model regression and stratified correlation analysis controlling for the therapist and presenting problem effects confirmed criterion validity. Results provide initial evidence for the validity and utility of the PRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Problem resolution scale: A single-item instrument for easily assessing clinical improvement\",\"authors\":\"Grégoire Vitry PhD,&nbsp;Rytis Pakrosnis PhD,&nbsp;Jeffrey B. Jackson PhD,&nbsp;Emmanuelle Gallin,&nbsp;Michael F. Hoyt PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jmft.12690\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study describes the development and tests the validity of the Problem Resolution Scale (PRS)—a single-item measure developed by researchers at Systemic Practice Research Network (SYPRENE) for assessing the degree to which the focal problem of therapy is perceived as resolved. Data were collected at termination from 747 clients seen across 18 therapists. Results suggested good construct validity, supported by a strong correlation between client and therapist perceptions as assessed by the PRS (<i>r</i> = 0.71, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Good criterion validity was also supported by strong correlations between client-reported psychological well-being and functioning at termination and both client-reported (<i>r</i> = −0.63; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) and therapist-reported (<i>r</i> = −0.66; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) problem resolution scores. Linear mixed model regression and stratified correlation analysis controlling for the therapist and presenting problem effects confirmed criterion validity. Results provide initial evidence for the validity and utility of the PRS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmft.12690\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jmft.12690","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题解决量表(PRS)是由系统实践研究网络(SYPRENE)的研究人员开发的一种单项量表,用于评估治疗中的焦点问题在多大程度上得到了解决,本研究描述了该量表的开发过程,并测试了其有效性。研究人员在治疗结束时收集了 18 位治疗师的 747 名客户的数据。结果表明,PRS 评估的求助者和治疗师感知之间存在很强的相关性(r = 0.71,p = 0.01),因此具有很好的建构效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Problem resolution scale: A single-item instrument for easily assessing clinical improvement

This study describes the development and tests the validity of the Problem Resolution Scale (PRS)—a single-item measure developed by researchers at Systemic Practice Research Network (SYPRENE) for assessing the degree to which the focal problem of therapy is perceived as resolved. Data were collected at termination from 747 clients seen across 18 therapists. Results suggested good construct validity, supported by a strong correlation between client and therapist perceptions as assessed by the PRS (r = 0.71, p < 0.001). Good criterion validity was also supported by strong correlations between client-reported psychological well-being and functioning at termination and both client-reported (r = −0.63; p < 0.001) and therapist-reported (r = −0.66; p < 0.001) problem resolution scores. Linear mixed model regression and stratified correlation analysis controlling for the therapist and presenting problem effects confirmed criterion validity. Results provide initial evidence for the validity and utility of the PRS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信