神经干预 TRUST 技术:复杂病例的可行替代方案。

Xinzhao Jiang, Peng Wang, Fang Liu, Huadong Wu, Peng Jiang, Ruozhen Yuan, Sheng Zhang, Zongjie Shi
{"title":"神经干预 TRUST 技术:复杂病例的可行替代方案。","authors":"Xinzhao Jiang, Peng Wang, Fang Liu, Huadong Wu, Peng Jiang, Ruozhen Yuan, Sheng Zhang, Zongjie Shi","doi":"10.2174/0115672026291503240105093155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neurointervention via Transradial Access (TRA) is becoming increasingly popular as experience with this technique increases. However, approximately 8.6-10.3% of complex TRA cases are converted to femoral access due to a lack of support or radial artery spasm. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the TRUST (trans-radial coaxial catheter technique using a short sheath, Simmons catheter, and Tethys intermediate catheter) technique in interventional procedures via TRA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective analysis of 16 patients admitted to our institute between January 2023 to May 2023 to undergo endovascular interventions with the TRUST technique via the TRA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the study population was 63.8 years, and 62.5% were male (10/16). The most common procedure was intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (93.75%, 15/16). All procedures were performed successfully, and the most common procedures in our cohort were ballooning (50.0%, 8/16), stenting (18.75%, 3/16), and both procedures combined (31.25%, 1/16). All procedures were performed using the TRA, and the distal and proximal radial arteries were used for access in 31.35% (5/16) and 68.75% (11/16) of the cases, respectively. Technical success was achieved in all patients and most cases demonstrated mTICI ≥2b recanalization (93.75%, 15/16). In this case, no major access-site complications occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TRUST technique is technically safe and feasible and had a high technical success rate and low complication rate in our study. These results demonstrate that the TRUST technique is a promising alternative for patients undergoing complex neurointerventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":93965,"journal":{"name":"Current neurovascular research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TRUST Technique for Neurointervention: A Promising Alternative for Complex Cases.\",\"authors\":\"Xinzhao Jiang, Peng Wang, Fang Liu, Huadong Wu, Peng Jiang, Ruozhen Yuan, Sheng Zhang, Zongjie Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115672026291503240105093155\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neurointervention via Transradial Access (TRA) is becoming increasingly popular as experience with this technique increases. However, approximately 8.6-10.3% of complex TRA cases are converted to femoral access due to a lack of support or radial artery spasm. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the TRUST (trans-radial coaxial catheter technique using a short sheath, Simmons catheter, and Tethys intermediate catheter) technique in interventional procedures via TRA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center retrospective analysis of 16 patients admitted to our institute between January 2023 to May 2023 to undergo endovascular interventions with the TRUST technique via the TRA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the study population was 63.8 years, and 62.5% were male (10/16). The most common procedure was intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (93.75%, 15/16). All procedures were performed successfully, and the most common procedures in our cohort were ballooning (50.0%, 8/16), stenting (18.75%, 3/16), and both procedures combined (31.25%, 1/16). All procedures were performed using the TRA, and the distal and proximal radial arteries were used for access in 31.35% (5/16) and 68.75% (11/16) of the cases, respectively. Technical success was achieved in all patients and most cases demonstrated mTICI ≥2b recanalization (93.75%, 15/16). In this case, no major access-site complications occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The TRUST technique is technically safe and feasible and had a high technical success rate and low complication rate in our study. These results demonstrate that the TRUST technique is a promising alternative for patients undergoing complex neurointerventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current neurovascular research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348452/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current neurovascular research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115672026291503240105093155\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current neurovascular research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115672026291503240105093155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:随着经桡动脉入路(TRA)神经介入技术经验的增加,这种技术越来越受欢迎。然而,约有 8.6%-10.3% 的复杂 TRA 病例因缺乏支持或桡动脉痉挛而转为股动脉入路。本研究旨在评估 TRUST(使用短鞘、Simmons 导管和 Tethys 中间导管的经桡动脉同轴导管技术)技术在经 TRA 介入手术中的有效性和安全性:这是一项单中心回顾性分析,研究对象是2023年1月至2023年5月期间在我院住院,通过TRA使用TRUST技术进行血管内介入治疗的16名患者:研究对象的平均年龄为63.8岁,62.5%为男性(10/16)。最常见的手术是颅内动脉粥样硬化性狭窄(93.75%,15/16)。所有手术均成功实施,在我们的队列中,最常见的手术是球囊扩张术(50.0%,8/16)、支架植入术(18.75%,3/16)以及两种手术的合并(31.25%,1/16)。所有手术均使用 TRA,分别有 31.35% (5/16)和 68.75% (11/16)的病例使用桡动脉远端和近端入路。所有患者都取得了技术成功,大多数病例都显示出 mTICI ≥2b 的再通率(93.75%,15/16)。结论:TRUST 技术在技术上是安全的:结论:TRUST 技术在技术上安全可行,在我们的研究中技术成功率高,并发症发生率低。这些结果表明,对于接受复杂神经介入治疗的患者来说,TRUST 技术是一种很有前途的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TRUST Technique for Neurointervention: A Promising Alternative for Complex Cases.

Background: Neurointervention via Transradial Access (TRA) is becoming increasingly popular as experience with this technique increases. However, approximately 8.6-10.3% of complex TRA cases are converted to femoral access due to a lack of support or radial artery spasm. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the TRUST (trans-radial coaxial catheter technique using a short sheath, Simmons catheter, and Tethys intermediate catheter) technique in interventional procedures via TRA.

Methods: This was a single-center retrospective analysis of 16 patients admitted to our institute between January 2023 to May 2023 to undergo endovascular interventions with the TRUST technique via the TRA.

Results: The mean age of the study population was 63.8 years, and 62.5% were male (10/16). The most common procedure was intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (93.75%, 15/16). All procedures were performed successfully, and the most common procedures in our cohort were ballooning (50.0%, 8/16), stenting (18.75%, 3/16), and both procedures combined (31.25%, 1/16). All procedures were performed using the TRA, and the distal and proximal radial arteries were used for access in 31.35% (5/16) and 68.75% (11/16) of the cases, respectively. Technical success was achieved in all patients and most cases demonstrated mTICI ≥2b recanalization (93.75%, 15/16). In this case, no major access-site complications occurred.

Conclusion: The TRUST technique is technically safe and feasible and had a high technical success rate and low complication rate in our study. These results demonstrate that the TRUST technique is a promising alternative for patients undergoing complex neurointerventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信