建立危机管理新架构：全球专家对获得外部资金的最佳和最差做法的见解

IF 2.6 3区管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT

Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1111/1468-5973.12539

Brooke Fisher Liu, Yan Jin, Wenqing Zhao, Andreas Schwarz, Oliva Truban, Mathew Seeger

{"title":"建立危机管理新架构：全球专家对获得外部资金的最佳和最差做法的见解","authors":"Brooke Fisher Liu, Yan Jin, Wenqing Zhao, Andreas Schwarz, Oliva Truban, Mathew Seeger","doi":"10.1111/1468-5973.12539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>External funding is an important yet understudied area of inquiry in crisis communication research. With external funding being a keystone of assessing and broadening research impact in both academia and industry, it is important for scholarship to examine effective practices for funding proposals. This study explores the best and worst practices for funded research through an expert consultation survey of 36 global communication scholars with track records of funding success. Findings reveal motivating factors for seeking, securing and managing funding, as well as institutional factors. Findings also inform best and worst practices for securing external funding, including bridging theory and practice and establishing strong research partnerships.</p>","PeriodicalId":47674,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-5973.12539","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building the new architecture of crisis management: Global experts' insights on best and worst practices for securing external funding\",\"authors\":\"Brooke Fisher Liu, Yan Jin, Wenqing Zhao, Andreas Schwarz, Oliva Truban, Mathew Seeger\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1468-5973.12539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>External funding is an important yet understudied area of inquiry in crisis communication research. With external funding being a keystone of assessing and broadening research impact in both academia and industry, it is important for scholarship to examine effective practices for funding proposals. This study explores the best and worst practices for funded research through an expert consultation survey of 36 global communication scholars with track records of funding success. Findings reveal motivating factors for seeking, securing and managing funding, as well as institutional factors. Findings also inform best and worst practices for securing external funding, including bridging theory and practice and establishing strong research partnerships.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47674,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1468-5973.12539\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-5973.12539\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-5973.12539","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

外部资助是危机传播研究中一个重要但研究不足的领域。外部资助是评估和扩大学术界和产业界研究影响的基石，因此研究资助提案的有效做法对学术研究非常重要。本研究通过对 36 位拥有成功融资记录的全球传播学者进行专家咨询调查，探讨了资助研究的最佳和最差做法。调查结果揭示了寻求、获得和管理资金的动机因素以及机构因素。调查结果还提供了获得外部资助的最佳和最差做法，包括在理论和实践之间架起桥梁以及建立牢固的研究伙伴关系。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Building the new architecture of crisis management: Global experts' insights on best and worst practices for securing external funding

External funding is an important yet understudied area of inquiry in crisis communication research. With external funding being a keystone of assessing and broadening research impact in both academia and industry, it is important for scholarship to examine effective practices for funding proposals. This study explores the best and worst practices for funded research through an expert consultation survey of 36 global communication scholars with track records of funding success. Findings reveal motivating factors for seeking, securing and managing funding, as well as institutional factors. Findings also inform best and worst practices for securing external funding, including bridging theory and practice and establishing strong research partnerships.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management MANAGEMENT-

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

12.90%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management is an invaluable source of information on all aspects of contingency planning, scenario analysis and crisis management in both corporate and public sectors. It focuses on the opportunities and threats facing organizations and presents analysis and case studies of crisis prevention, crisis planning, recovery and turnaround management. With contributions from world-wide sources including corporations, governmental agencies, think tanks and influential academics, this publication provides a vital platform for the exchange of strategic and operational experience, information and knowledge.