Matthias Froehlich, Konstanze V Guggenberger, Marius Vogt, Patrick W Mihatsch, Giulia Dalla Torre, Rudolf A Werner, Michael Gernert, Patrick P Strunz, Jan Portegys, Andreas M Weng, Marc Schmalzing, Thorsten A Bley
{"title":"MRVAS 评分--引入标准化磁共振评分系统，评估巨细胞动脉炎的炎症负担程度。","authors":"Matthias Froehlich, Konstanze V Guggenberger, Marius Vogt, Patrick W Mihatsch, Giulia Dalla Torre, Rudolf A Werner, Michael Gernert, Patrick P Strunz, Jan Portegys, Andreas M Weng, Marc Schmalzing, Thorsten A Bley","doi":"10.1093/rheumatology/keae056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our aim was to introduce a standardized system for assessing the extent of GCA on MRI, i.e. the Magnetic Resonance Vasculitis Activity Score (MRVAS). To obtain a comprehensive view, we used an extensive MRI protocol including cranial vessels and the aorta with its branches. To test reliability, MRI was assessed by four readers with different levels of experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 80 patients with suspected GCA underwent MRI of the cranial arteries and the aorta and its branches (20 vessel segments). Every vessel was rated dichotomous [inflamed (coded as 1) or not (coded as 0)], providing a summed score of 0-20. Blinded readers [two experienced radiologists (ExR) and two inexperienced radiologists (InR)] applied the MRVAS on an individual vessel and an overall level (defined as the highest score of any of the individual vessel scores). To determine interrater agreement, Cohen's κ was calculated for pairwise comparison of each reader for individual vessel segments. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for the MRVAS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concordance rates were excellent for both subcohorts on an individual vessel-based (GCA: ICC 0.95; non-GCA: ICC 0.96) and overall MRVAS level (GCA: ICC 0.96; non-GCA: ICC 1.0). Interrater agreement yielded significant concordance (P < 0.001) for all pairs (κ range 0.78-0.98). No significant differences between ExRs and InRs were observed (P = 0.38).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed MRVAS allows standardized scoring of inflammation in GCA and achieved high agreement rates in a prospective setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":4,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MRVAS-introducing a standardized magnetic resonance scoring system for assessing the extent of inflammatory burden in giant cell arteritis.\",\"authors\":\"Matthias Froehlich, Konstanze V Guggenberger, Marius Vogt, Patrick W Mihatsch, Giulia Dalla Torre, Rudolf A Werner, Michael Gernert, Patrick P Strunz, Jan Portegys, Andreas M Weng, Marc Schmalzing, Thorsten A Bley\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/rheumatology/keae056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our aim was to introduce a standardized system for assessing the extent of GCA on MRI, i.e. the Magnetic Resonance Vasculitis Activity Score (MRVAS). To obtain a comprehensive view, we used an extensive MRI protocol including cranial vessels and the aorta with its branches. To test reliability, MRI was assessed by four readers with different levels of experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 80 patients with suspected GCA underwent MRI of the cranial arteries and the aorta and its branches (20 vessel segments). Every vessel was rated dichotomous [inflamed (coded as 1) or not (coded as 0)], providing a summed score of 0-20. Blinded readers [two experienced radiologists (ExR) and two inexperienced radiologists (InR)] applied the MRVAS on an individual vessel and an overall level (defined as the highest score of any of the individual vessel scores). To determine interrater agreement, Cohen's κ was calculated for pairwise comparison of each reader for individual vessel segments. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for the MRVAS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Concordance rates were excellent for both subcohorts on an individual vessel-based (GCA: ICC 0.95; non-GCA: ICC 0.96) and overall MRVAS level (GCA: ICC 0.96; non-GCA: ICC 1.0). Interrater agreement yielded significant concordance (P < 0.001) for all pairs (κ range 0.78-0.98). No significant differences between ExRs and InRs were observed (P = 0.38).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed MRVAS allows standardized scoring of inflammation in GCA and achieved high agreement rates in a prospective setting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":4,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Energy Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Energy Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keae056\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Energy Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keae056","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
MRVAS-introducing a standardized magnetic resonance scoring system for assessing the extent of inflammatory burden in giant cell arteritis.
Objectives: Our aim was to introduce a standardized system for assessing the extent of GCA on MRI, i.e. the Magnetic Resonance Vasculitis Activity Score (MRVAS). To obtain a comprehensive view, we used an extensive MRI protocol including cranial vessels and the aorta with its branches. To test reliability, MRI was assessed by four readers with different levels of experience.
Methods: A total of 80 patients with suspected GCA underwent MRI of the cranial arteries and the aorta and its branches (20 vessel segments). Every vessel was rated dichotomous [inflamed (coded as 1) or not (coded as 0)], providing a summed score of 0-20. Blinded readers [two experienced radiologists (ExR) and two inexperienced radiologists (InR)] applied the MRVAS on an individual vessel and an overall level (defined as the highest score of any of the individual vessel scores). To determine interrater agreement, Cohen's κ was calculated for pairwise comparison of each reader for individual vessel segments. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used for the MRVAS.
Results: Concordance rates were excellent for both subcohorts on an individual vessel-based (GCA: ICC 0.95; non-GCA: ICC 0.96) and overall MRVAS level (GCA: ICC 0.96; non-GCA: ICC 1.0). Interrater agreement yielded significant concordance (P < 0.001) for all pairs (κ range 0.78-0.98). No significant differences between ExRs and InRs were observed (P = 0.38).
Conclusion: The proposed MRVAS allows standardized scoring of inflammation in GCA and achieved high agreement rates in a prospective setting.
期刊介绍：
ACS Applied Energy Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of materials, engineering, chemistry, physics and biology relevant to energy conversion and storage. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrate knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important energy applications.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
