评估有问题的 Facebook 使用情况:波兰语版 Facebook 入侵问卷的心理计量特性

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Agata Błachnio , Aneta Przepiórka , Andrzej Cudo , Raichel.A. Elphinston
{"title":"评估有问题的 Facebook 使用情况:波兰语版 Facebook 入侵问卷的心理计量特性","authors":"Agata Błachnio ,&nbsp;Aneta Przepiórka ,&nbsp;Andrzej Cudo ,&nbsp;Raichel.A. Elphinston","doi":"10.1016/j.erap.2023.100939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Facebook is used for work, entertainment, and communication. However, there is potential for problematic or addictive use that can cause significant mental and physical health problems.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The Facebook Intrusion Questionnaire (FIQ; Elphinston &amp; Noller, 2011) is one of the most widely used measures of problematic Facebook use, but no previous study has validated this measure in a Polish population. The present study aimed to validate the Polish adaptation of the FIQ.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The authors recruited five large samples of Polish Facebook users (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->12,753; <em>M</em><sub>age</sub> <!-->=<!--> <span>21 years; 66% female) to examine the psychometric properties of the Polish version of the questionnaire. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported its unidimensional factor structure (</span><em>χ</em><sup>2</sup><sub>(<em>df</em></sub> <sub>=</sub> <sub>19)</sub> <!-->=<!--> <!-->602.64, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001; RMSEA<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.069, SRMR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.032, CFI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.962, TLI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.943).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Item response theory showed that the adapted FIQ items had adequate discrimination and information levels. The Polish version of the FIQ showed good internal consistency and adequate construct validity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Overall, the results suggest that the FIQ is a reliable and valid measure for use with a Polish population.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46883,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","volume":"74 1","pages":"Article 100939"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing problematic Facebook use: Psychometric properties of the Polish version of Facebook Intrusion Questionnaire\",\"authors\":\"Agata Błachnio ,&nbsp;Aneta Przepiórka ,&nbsp;Andrzej Cudo ,&nbsp;Raichel.A. Elphinston\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erap.2023.100939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Facebook is used for work, entertainment, and communication. However, there is potential for problematic or addictive use that can cause significant mental and physical health problems.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The Facebook Intrusion Questionnaire (FIQ; Elphinston &amp; Noller, 2011) is one of the most widely used measures of problematic Facebook use, but no previous study has validated this measure in a Polish population. The present study aimed to validate the Polish adaptation of the FIQ.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The authors recruited five large samples of Polish Facebook users (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->12,753; <em>M</em><sub>age</sub> <!-->=<!--> <span>21 years; 66% female) to examine the psychometric properties of the Polish version of the questionnaire. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported its unidimensional factor structure (</span><em>χ</em><sup>2</sup><sub>(<em>df</em></sub> <sub>=</sub> <sub>19)</sub> <!-->=<!--> <!-->602.64, <em>p</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->.001; RMSEA<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.069, SRMR<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.032, CFI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.962, TLI<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->.943).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Item response theory showed that the adapted FIQ items had adequate discrimination and information levels. The Polish version of the FIQ showed good internal consistency and adequate construct validity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Overall, the results suggest that the FIQ is a reliable and valid measure for use with a Polish population.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46883,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100939\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1162908823000725\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Applied Psychology-Revue Europeenne De Psychologie Appliquee","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1162908823000725","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言Facebook用于工作、娱乐和交流。然而,有可能出现问题性或成瘾性使用,从而导致严重的身心健康问题。研究目的Facebook干扰问卷(FIQ; Elphinston & Noller, 2011)是最广泛使用的Facebook问题性使用测量方法之一,但之前没有研究在波兰人群中验证过该测量方法。本研究旨在验证波兰语版的 FIQ。方法作者招募了五个波兰 Facebook 用户大样本(n = 12,753 人;年龄 = 21 岁;66% 为女性),以检验波兰语版问卷的心理测量特性。探索性和确认性因素分析支持其单维因素结构(χ2(df = 19) = 602.64, p < .001;RMSEA = .069,SRMR = .032,CFI = .962,TLI = .943)。结果项目反应理论表明,改编后的 FIQ 项目具有足够的区分度和信息量。波兰语版的 FIQ 显示出良好的内部一致性和足够的构建效度。结论总体而言,研究结果表明,FIQ 是一种可靠有效的测量方法,适用于波兰人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing problematic Facebook use: Psychometric properties of the Polish version of Facebook Intrusion Questionnaire

Introduction

Facebook is used for work, entertainment, and communication. However, there is potential for problematic or addictive use that can cause significant mental and physical health problems.

Objective

The Facebook Intrusion Questionnaire (FIQ; Elphinston & Noller, 2011) is one of the most widely used measures of problematic Facebook use, but no previous study has validated this measure in a Polish population. The present study aimed to validate the Polish adaptation of the FIQ.

Method

The authors recruited five large samples of Polish Facebook users (n = 12,753; Mage = 21 years; 66% female) to examine the psychometric properties of the Polish version of the questionnaire. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported its unidimensional factor structure (χ2(df = 19) = 602.64, p < .001; RMSEA = .069, SRMR = .032, CFI = .962, TLI = .943).

Results

Item response theory showed that the adapted FIQ items had adequate discrimination and information levels. The Polish version of the FIQ showed good internal consistency and adequate construct validity.

Conclusion

Overall, the results suggest that the FIQ is a reliable and valid measure for use with a Polish population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: The aim of the Revue européenne de Psychologie appliquée / European Review of Applied Psychology is to promote high-quality applications of psychology to all areas of specialization, and to foster exchange among researchers and professionals. Its policy is to attract a wide range of contributions, including empirical research, overviews of target issues, case studies, descriptions of instruments for research and diagnosis, and theoretical work related to applied psychology. In all cases, authors will refer to published and verificable facts, whether established in the study being reported or in earlier publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信