使用 GRACE、TIMI 和 HEART 评分预测急性冠状动脉综合征后住院和 6 个月死亡率的价值

Q4 Medicine
An Viet Tran , Dang Duy Truong , Toan Hoang Ngo , Oanh Thi Kim Nguyen , Son Kim Tran , Phuong Kim Huynh
{"title":"使用 GRACE、TIMI 和 HEART 评分预测急性冠状动脉综合征后住院和 6 个月死亡率的价值","authors":"An Viet Tran ,&nbsp;Dang Duy Truong ,&nbsp;Toan Hoang Ngo ,&nbsp;Oanh Thi Kim Nguyen ,&nbsp;Son Kim Tran ,&nbsp;Phuong Kim Huynh","doi":"10.1016/j.mcpsp.2023.100419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Prognostic assessment of early cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can be aided by the HEART, TIMI, and GRACE scores. However, their combined use has not been extensively researched.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Determining the prognostic value of in-hospital and 6-month mortality using the GRACE, TIMI, and HEART scores in patients with acute coronary syndrome.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study on 68 patients with acute coronary syndrome, following them longitudinally for 6 months at Can Tho Central General Hospital, Vietnam.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The GRACE score demonstrated good prognostic value for in-hospital mortality, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.805. Sensitivity and specificity were 90% and 65.51%. Conversely, the TIMI risk score had a poor prognostic value for in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.682; sensitivity = 60%, specificity = 63.79%) and 6-month mortality (AUC = 0.692; sensitivity = 60%, specificity = 66.03%). On the other hand, the HEART score had quite good prognostic value for in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.726; sensitivity = 50%, specificity = 89.74%) and good prognostic value for 6-month mortality (AUC = 0.805; sensitivity = 57.1%, specificity = 97.14%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The GRACE scores demonstrate greater prognostic value for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to the TIMI and HEART scores.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36921,"journal":{"name":"Medicina Clinica Practica","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100419"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603924923000575/pdfft?md5=51e59a56061c6cab498fa33cb0035f47&pid=1-s2.0-S2603924923000575-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic value of in-hospital and 6-month mortality after acute coronary syndrome using GRACE, TIMI, and HEART scores\",\"authors\":\"An Viet Tran ,&nbsp;Dang Duy Truong ,&nbsp;Toan Hoang Ngo ,&nbsp;Oanh Thi Kim Nguyen ,&nbsp;Son Kim Tran ,&nbsp;Phuong Kim Huynh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mcpsp.2023.100419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Prognostic assessment of early cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can be aided by the HEART, TIMI, and GRACE scores. However, their combined use has not been extensively researched.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Determining the prognostic value of in-hospital and 6-month mortality using the GRACE, TIMI, and HEART scores in patients with acute coronary syndrome.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study on 68 patients with acute coronary syndrome, following them longitudinally for 6 months at Can Tho Central General Hospital, Vietnam.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The GRACE score demonstrated good prognostic value for in-hospital mortality, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.805. Sensitivity and specificity were 90% and 65.51%. Conversely, the TIMI risk score had a poor prognostic value for in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.682; sensitivity = 60%, specificity = 63.79%) and 6-month mortality (AUC = 0.692; sensitivity = 60%, specificity = 66.03%). On the other hand, the HEART score had quite good prognostic value for in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.726; sensitivity = 50%, specificity = 89.74%) and good prognostic value for 6-month mortality (AUC = 0.805; sensitivity = 57.1%, specificity = 97.14%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The GRACE scores demonstrate greater prognostic value for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to the TIMI and HEART scores.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina Clinica Practica\",\"volume\":\"7 2\",\"pages\":\"Article 100419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603924923000575/pdfft?md5=51e59a56061c6cab498fa33cb0035f47&pid=1-s2.0-S2603924923000575-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina Clinica Practica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603924923000575\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina Clinica Practica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2603924923000575","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者早期心血管事件的诊断评估可借助 HEART、TIMI 和 GRACE 评分。目的在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中使用 GRACE、TIMI 和 HEART 评分确定院内和 6 个月死亡率的预后价值。方法我们在越南芹苴中心综合医院对 68 名急性冠状动脉综合征患者进行了一项横断面描述性研究,并对他们进行了为期 6 个月的纵向随访。结果GRACE 评分对院内死亡率显示出良好的预后价值,其曲线下面积 (AUC) 为 0.805。灵敏度和特异度分别为 90% 和 65.51%。相反,TIMI 风险评分对院内死亡率(AUC = 0.682;灵敏度 = 60%,特异度 = 63.79%)和 6 个月死亡率(AUC = 0.692;灵敏度 = 60%,特异度 = 66.03%)的预后价值较差。另一方面,HEART 评分对院内死亡率(AUC = 0.726;灵敏度 = 50%,特异性 = 89.74%)和 6 个月死亡率(AUC = 0.805;灵敏度 = 57.1%,特异性 = 97.14%)具有相当好的预后价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic value of in-hospital and 6-month mortality after acute coronary syndrome using GRACE, TIMI, and HEART scores

Background

Prognostic assessment of early cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can be aided by the HEART, TIMI, and GRACE scores. However, their combined use has not been extensively researched.

Objectives

Determining the prognostic value of in-hospital and 6-month mortality using the GRACE, TIMI, and HEART scores in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study on 68 patients with acute coronary syndrome, following them longitudinally for 6 months at Can Tho Central General Hospital, Vietnam.

Results

The GRACE score demonstrated good prognostic value for in-hospital mortality, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.805. Sensitivity and specificity were 90% and 65.51%. Conversely, the TIMI risk score had a poor prognostic value for in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.682; sensitivity = 60%, specificity = 63.79%) and 6-month mortality (AUC = 0.692; sensitivity = 60%, specificity = 66.03%). On the other hand, the HEART score had quite good prognostic value for in-hospital mortality (AUC = 0.726; sensitivity = 50%, specificity = 89.74%) and good prognostic value for 6-month mortality (AUC = 0.805; sensitivity = 57.1%, specificity = 97.14%).

Conclusion

The GRACE scores demonstrate greater prognostic value for in-hospital mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome compared to the TIMI and HEART scores.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina Clinica Practica
Medicina Clinica Practica Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
43 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信