比较讲授法和讨论法:尼日利亚瓜达巴瓦苏丹阿卜杜拉赫曼卫生技术学校医学检验科学学生的看法评估

Yusuf Yahaya Miya, Anas Yusuf
{"title":"比较讲授法和讨论法:尼日利亚瓜达巴瓦苏丹阿卜杜拉赫曼卫生技术学校医学检验科学学生的看法评估","authors":"Yusuf Yahaya Miya, Anas Yusuf","doi":"10.58578/ijhess.v2i1.2561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medical Laboratory Science skilled workers are needed at hospital and other settings more than ever. These workers are produced by schools through teaching and learning. Medical Laboratory scholars are on many occasions involved in training and teaching. Nevertheless, nowadays teaching is been centered towards the views of learners, thus the aim of those study was to compare lecture and discussion teaching methods among students at Medical Laboratory Science Department at Sultan Abdurrahman School of Health Technology Gwadabawa with a view to select better learning method. A survey of 60 participants using a semi-structured questionnaire was done and descriptive statistics aided the analysis. Best teaching method selected by the respondents was the lecture method (100.0%); while none of them (0.0%) submitted discussion method as the method they want in learning Medical Laboratory Science. Advantages or reasons for choosing lecture method than the discussion method as submitted by the respondents are stated. The most frequently stated was \"Less cost (30.0%)\" then, \" No tedious efforts from students in understanding lectures (26.7%)\" \"Give room for more research (16.7%),\" \" No anxiety (13.3%), \" \"Give room for rehearsal (8.3%)\" and \" Teacher give important points (5.0%)\". The disadvantages of discussion (presentation) method are: Some students are in anxiety (33.3%), time consuming (25.0%), students may have limited knowledge (20.0%), students spend more money (16.7%), and some students may easily not contribute (5.0%). Thus, lectures are suitable and better ways of making Medical Laboratory Science students that will become technicians and relations.","PeriodicalId":516825,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences","volume":" 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Lecture and Discussion Methods: Assessment of Perception of Medical Laboratory Science Students at Sultan Abdurrahman School of Health Technology Gwadabawa, Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"Yusuf Yahaya Miya, Anas Yusuf\",\"doi\":\"10.58578/ijhess.v2i1.2561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Medical Laboratory Science skilled workers are needed at hospital and other settings more than ever. These workers are produced by schools through teaching and learning. Medical Laboratory scholars are on many occasions involved in training and teaching. Nevertheless, nowadays teaching is been centered towards the views of learners, thus the aim of those study was to compare lecture and discussion teaching methods among students at Medical Laboratory Science Department at Sultan Abdurrahman School of Health Technology Gwadabawa with a view to select better learning method. A survey of 60 participants using a semi-structured questionnaire was done and descriptive statistics aided the analysis. Best teaching method selected by the respondents was the lecture method (100.0%); while none of them (0.0%) submitted discussion method as the method they want in learning Medical Laboratory Science. Advantages or reasons for choosing lecture method than the discussion method as submitted by the respondents are stated. The most frequently stated was \\\"Less cost (30.0%)\\\" then, \\\" No tedious efforts from students in understanding lectures (26.7%)\\\" \\\"Give room for more research (16.7%),\\\" \\\" No anxiety (13.3%), \\\" \\\"Give room for rehearsal (8.3%)\\\" and \\\" Teacher give important points (5.0%)\\\". The disadvantages of discussion (presentation) method are: Some students are in anxiety (33.3%), time consuming (25.0%), students may have limited knowledge (20.0%), students spend more money (16.7%), and some students may easily not contribute (5.0%). Thus, lectures are suitable and better ways of making Medical Laboratory Science students that will become technicians and relations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\" 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58578/ijhess.v2i1.2561\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Humanities, Education, and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58578/ijhess.v2i1.2561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医院和其他机构比以往任何时候都更需要医学检验科学方面的技术工人。学校通过教学培养这些人才。医学检验学者在许多场合都参与培训和教学。因此,本研究旨在比较瓜达巴瓦苏丹阿卜杜拉赫曼卫生技术学校医学检验系学生的讲授法和讨论法,以便选择更好的学习方法。研究采用半结构式问卷对 60 名参与者进行了调查,并通过描述性统计进行了分析。受访者选择的最佳教学方法是讲授法(100.0%);而没有受访者(0.0%)将讨论法作为学习医学检验科学的方法。受访者提出了选择讲授法而不是讨论法的优势或原因。最常见的理由是 "成本较低(30.0%)",然后是 "学生不需要费力理解讲义(26.7%)"、"有更多的研究空间(16.7%)"、"没有焦虑(13.3%)"、"有演练空间(8.3%)"和 "教师给出重要观点(5.0%)"。讨论(演示)法的缺点是有些学生会感到焦虑(33.3%),耗费时间(25.0%),学生的知识可能有限(20.0%),学生花费较多(16.7%),有些学生容易不发言(5.0%)。因此,讲座是培养医学检验专业学生成为技术人员和关系人员的合适且更好的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Lecture and Discussion Methods: Assessment of Perception of Medical Laboratory Science Students at Sultan Abdurrahman School of Health Technology Gwadabawa, Nigeria
Medical Laboratory Science skilled workers are needed at hospital and other settings more than ever. These workers are produced by schools through teaching and learning. Medical Laboratory scholars are on many occasions involved in training and teaching. Nevertheless, nowadays teaching is been centered towards the views of learners, thus the aim of those study was to compare lecture and discussion teaching methods among students at Medical Laboratory Science Department at Sultan Abdurrahman School of Health Technology Gwadabawa with a view to select better learning method. A survey of 60 participants using a semi-structured questionnaire was done and descriptive statistics aided the analysis. Best teaching method selected by the respondents was the lecture method (100.0%); while none of them (0.0%) submitted discussion method as the method they want in learning Medical Laboratory Science. Advantages or reasons for choosing lecture method than the discussion method as submitted by the respondents are stated. The most frequently stated was "Less cost (30.0%)" then, " No tedious efforts from students in understanding lectures (26.7%)" "Give room for more research (16.7%)," " No anxiety (13.3%), " "Give room for rehearsal (8.3%)" and " Teacher give important points (5.0%)". The disadvantages of discussion (presentation) method are: Some students are in anxiety (33.3%), time consuming (25.0%), students may have limited knowledge (20.0%), students spend more money (16.7%), and some students may easily not contribute (5.0%). Thus, lectures are suitable and better ways of making Medical Laboratory Science students that will become technicians and relations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信