使用 ELECTRE 方法评估三种常见绿色建筑材料

1 Pub Date : 2024-01-11 DOI:10.46632/bmes/1/1/4
{"title":"使用 ELECTRE 方法评估三种常见绿色建筑材料","authors":"","doi":"10.46632/bmes/1/1/4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research paper examines various options for replacing halogenated flame retardants with non-halogenated green construction material choices. Cellulosic construction materials like bamboo do not form compounds with conventional flame retardants. Due to a number of circumstances, including the minimal effectiveness of the flame-retardant activity, they may thus be an unnecessary component of the substrate and simply peel off. Utilizing an additive that comes into direct contact with at least one component of the \"green building material\" will provide long-lasting flame retardancy since the flame retardant will become a structurally integral element of the substrate. The response mechanisms of various treatment approaches are also discussed in this research to ensure that non-halogenated flame retardants effectively protect sustainable building materials like wood and bamboo. This paper demonstrates how various ELECTRE approaches may be used to choose effective tactics that take into account both technical and human behavioral barriers using a typical case study inside an organization. The impact of impedance from each system subsystem is investigated to assure the dependability of the selected method. When employee participation is a deciding element in the multidimensional strategic planning problem, a comparison of a range of compensated and non-compensatory models reveals that the models may produce less. Resistance strategies; However, ELECTRE shows very reasonable sensitivity. The alternatives are Gladstone, Port Augusta, Collie and Tarong. the evaluation parameters are Construction cost, Procurement cost, Waste reduction, GHG emissions, Cement replacement and Self-consolidating. The Final Result of Net superior value and rank the Gladstone is in fourth rank, The Port Augusta is in second rank, The Collie is in third rank, The Tarong is in first rank of the Net Inferior Value and Rank the Tarong is in fourth rank, The Gladstone is in first rank, The Port Augusta is in Second rank, The Collie is in third rank.","PeriodicalId":6298,"journal":{"name":"1","volume":" 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Three Common Green Building Materials Using ELECTRE Method\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.46632/bmes/1/1/4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research paper examines various options for replacing halogenated flame retardants with non-halogenated green construction material choices. Cellulosic construction materials like bamboo do not form compounds with conventional flame retardants. Due to a number of circumstances, including the minimal effectiveness of the flame-retardant activity, they may thus be an unnecessary component of the substrate and simply peel off. Utilizing an additive that comes into direct contact with at least one component of the \\\"green building material\\\" will provide long-lasting flame retardancy since the flame retardant will become a structurally integral element of the substrate. The response mechanisms of various treatment approaches are also discussed in this research to ensure that non-halogenated flame retardants effectively protect sustainable building materials like wood and bamboo. This paper demonstrates how various ELECTRE approaches may be used to choose effective tactics that take into account both technical and human behavioral barriers using a typical case study inside an organization. The impact of impedance from each system subsystem is investigated to assure the dependability of the selected method. When employee participation is a deciding element in the multidimensional strategic planning problem, a comparison of a range of compensated and non-compensatory models reveals that the models may produce less. Resistance strategies; However, ELECTRE shows very reasonable sensitivity. The alternatives are Gladstone, Port Augusta, Collie and Tarong. the evaluation parameters are Construction cost, Procurement cost, Waste reduction, GHG emissions, Cement replacement and Self-consolidating. The Final Result of Net superior value and rank the Gladstone is in fourth rank, The Port Augusta is in second rank, The Collie is in third rank, The Tarong is in first rank of the Net Inferior Value and Rank the Tarong is in fourth rank, The Gladstone is in first rank, The Port Augusta is in Second rank, The Collie is in third rank.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"1\",\"volume\":\" 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"1\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46632/bmes/1/1/4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46632/bmes/1/1/4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究论文探讨了用非卤素绿色建筑材料替代卤素阻燃剂的各种方案。竹子等纤维素建筑材料不会与传统阻燃剂形成化合物。由于多种原因,包括阻燃剂的效力极低,它们可能成为基材中不必要的成分,并简单地剥落。使用一种添加剂与 "绿色建筑材料 "的至少一种成分直接接触,可提供持久的阻燃性,因为阻燃剂将成为基材结构上不可或缺的组成部分。本研究还讨论了各种处理方法的反应机制,以确保无卤阻燃剂能有效保护木材和竹子等可持续建筑材料。本文通过一个组织内部的典型案例研究,展示了如何利用各种 ELECTRE 方法来选择有效的策略,并将技术和人类行为障碍都考虑在内。本文调查了每个系统子系统阻抗的影响,以确保所选方法的可靠性。当员工参与是多维战略规划问题中的决定性因素时,对一系列补偿和非补偿模型进行比较后发现,这些模型可能会产生较少的效果。抵抗战略;不过,ELECTRE 显示出非常合理的灵敏度。替代方案是格拉德斯通、奥古斯塔港、科利和塔龙。评估参数是建筑成本、采购成本、减少废物、温室气体排放、水泥替代和自密实。净优值和排名的最终结果是:Gladstone 排名第四,Port Augusta 排名第二,Collie 排名第三,Tarong 排名第一;净劣值和排名的最终结果是:Tarong 排名第四,Gladstone 排名第一,Port Augusta 排名第二,Collie 排名第三。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Three Common Green Building Materials Using ELECTRE Method
This research paper examines various options for replacing halogenated flame retardants with non-halogenated green construction material choices. Cellulosic construction materials like bamboo do not form compounds with conventional flame retardants. Due to a number of circumstances, including the minimal effectiveness of the flame-retardant activity, they may thus be an unnecessary component of the substrate and simply peel off. Utilizing an additive that comes into direct contact with at least one component of the "green building material" will provide long-lasting flame retardancy since the flame retardant will become a structurally integral element of the substrate. The response mechanisms of various treatment approaches are also discussed in this research to ensure that non-halogenated flame retardants effectively protect sustainable building materials like wood and bamboo. This paper demonstrates how various ELECTRE approaches may be used to choose effective tactics that take into account both technical and human behavioral barriers using a typical case study inside an organization. The impact of impedance from each system subsystem is investigated to assure the dependability of the selected method. When employee participation is a deciding element in the multidimensional strategic planning problem, a comparison of a range of compensated and non-compensatory models reveals that the models may produce less. Resistance strategies; However, ELECTRE shows very reasonable sensitivity. The alternatives are Gladstone, Port Augusta, Collie and Tarong. the evaluation parameters are Construction cost, Procurement cost, Waste reduction, GHG emissions, Cement replacement and Self-consolidating. The Final Result of Net superior value and rank the Gladstone is in fourth rank, The Port Augusta is in second rank, The Collie is in third rank, The Tarong is in first rank of the Net Inferior Value and Rank the Tarong is in fourth rank, The Gladstone is in first rank, The Port Augusta is in Second rank, The Collie is in third rank.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
1
1
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信