对疑似肉样瘤病患者进行支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸纵隔和肺门淋巴结现场快速评估的实用性

Vikas Pathak, Mark J. Richman, Prekchha Jha
{"title":"对疑似肉样瘤病患者进行支气管内超声引导下经支气管针吸纵隔和肺门淋巴结现场快速评估的实用性","authors":"Vikas Pathak, Mark J. Richman, Prekchha Jha","doi":"10.46405/ejms.v5i1.514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is a technique where transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) cytology samples are rapidly stained and screened for diagnostic material in the procedure room, during the procedure. We hypothesized the sensitivity of ROSE in patients with sarcoidosis is very low, leading to unjustified use of an expensive technique.Data and Methods This was a retrospective study at an inner-city hospital. Medical records of all patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes with ROSE over a 3-year period were evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of ROSE in patients with sarcoidosis were calculated, with pathologic diagnosis by cell block as the “gold standard.” Patients with malignancy were used as a comparison. Results One hundred eighty-four patients who had ROSE on EBUS-TBNA of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes were included. Thirty were diagnosed with sarcoidosis, 95 with malignancy, and 59 with benign lymph nodes. The sensitivity of ROSE in patients with sarcoidosis was 44%, specificity and positive predictive value were 100%, and negative predictive value was only 17%. Conclusion Given low sensitivity and negative predictive value, ROSE may not be as useful in diagnosing sarcoidosis as it is in diagnosing malignancy.","PeriodicalId":254508,"journal":{"name":"Europasian Journal of Medical Sciences","volume":" 25","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of Rapid On-Site Evaluation on Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspirate of the Mediastinal and Hilar Lymph Nodes in Patients with Suspected Sarcoidosis\",\"authors\":\"Vikas Pathak, Mark J. Richman, Prekchha Jha\",\"doi\":\"10.46405/ejms.v5i1.514\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is a technique where transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) cytology samples are rapidly stained and screened for diagnostic material in the procedure room, during the procedure. We hypothesized the sensitivity of ROSE in patients with sarcoidosis is very low, leading to unjustified use of an expensive technique.Data and Methods This was a retrospective study at an inner-city hospital. Medical records of all patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes with ROSE over a 3-year period were evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of ROSE in patients with sarcoidosis were calculated, with pathologic diagnosis by cell block as the “gold standard.” Patients with malignancy were used as a comparison. Results One hundred eighty-four patients who had ROSE on EBUS-TBNA of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes were included. Thirty were diagnosed with sarcoidosis, 95 with malignancy, and 59 with benign lymph nodes. The sensitivity of ROSE in patients with sarcoidosis was 44%, specificity and positive predictive value were 100%, and negative predictive value was only 17%. Conclusion Given low sensitivity and negative predictive value, ROSE may not be as useful in diagnosing sarcoidosis as it is in diagnosing malignancy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":254508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Europasian Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"volume\":\" 25\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Europasian Journal of Medical Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46405/ejms.v5i1.514\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europasian Journal of Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46405/ejms.v5i1.514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 现场快速评估(ROSE)是一种在手术过程中,在手术室对经支气管针吸(TBNA)细胞学样本进行快速染色和筛查诊断材料的技术。我们假设肉样瘤病患者对 ROSE 的敏感性非常低,从而导致不合理地使用昂贵的技术。 数据和方法 这是一项在市内医院进行的回顾性研究。研究评估了 3 年内所有接受 EBUS-TBNA 和 ROSE 检查纵隔和肺门淋巴结的患者的病历。以细胞包块病理诊断为 "金标准",计算了肉样瘤病患者 ROSE 的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。恶性肿瘤患者作为对比。结果 共纳入 184 名纵隔和肺门淋巴结 EBUS-TBNA 检查出 ROSE 的患者。其中 30 人被诊断为肉样瘤病,95 人被诊断为恶性肿瘤,59 人被诊断为良性淋巴结。肉样瘤病患者的 ROSE 敏感性为 44%,特异性和阳性预测值均为 100%,阴性预测值仅为 17%。结论 由于灵敏度和阴性预测值较低,ROSE 在诊断肉样瘤病方面的作用可能不如在诊断恶性肿瘤方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utility of Rapid On-Site Evaluation on Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Transbronchial Needle Aspirate of the Mediastinal and Hilar Lymph Nodes in Patients with Suspected Sarcoidosis
Background Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) is a technique where transbronchial needle aspiration (TBNA) cytology samples are rapidly stained and screened for diagnostic material in the procedure room, during the procedure. We hypothesized the sensitivity of ROSE in patients with sarcoidosis is very low, leading to unjustified use of an expensive technique.Data and Methods This was a retrospective study at an inner-city hospital. Medical records of all patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes with ROSE over a 3-year period were evaluated. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of ROSE in patients with sarcoidosis were calculated, with pathologic diagnosis by cell block as the “gold standard.” Patients with malignancy were used as a comparison. Results One hundred eighty-four patients who had ROSE on EBUS-TBNA of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes were included. Thirty were diagnosed with sarcoidosis, 95 with malignancy, and 59 with benign lymph nodes. The sensitivity of ROSE in patients with sarcoidosis was 44%, specificity and positive predictive value were 100%, and negative predictive value was only 17%. Conclusion Given low sensitivity and negative predictive value, ROSE may not be as useful in diagnosing sarcoidosis as it is in diagnosing malignancy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信