ArthroFree 无线手术相机的人为因素可用性分析

Pearl Griffin, Patrick Polito, Leah Brownlee, Jeff Ustin, Kipum Lee, Craig Conner
{"title":"ArthroFree 无线手术相机的人为因素可用性分析","authors":"Pearl Griffin, Patrick Polito, Leah Brownlee, Jeff Ustin, Kipum Lee, Craig Conner","doi":"10.60118/001c.87965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional arthroscopy is performed with a narrow tube, the arthroscope, attached to a camera and two cables - one for power and one for fiber-optic light. The cables can be cumbersome, routed across or around the patient, and risk bridging the sterile and nonsterile fields. ArthroFree®, a wireless surgical camera for arthroscopy, features wireless communication and battery power and was designed to eliminate cable-associated burdens. An iterative product development process established the usability of ArthroFree. Feedback on ArthroFree’s design was received from 88 participants (82 surgeons and 6 other medical professionals) on ergonomics, ease of use, image quality, and patient experience following design validation testing (pre-FDA clearance; 76 participants) or clinical evaluation (post-FDA clearance; 12 participants). Participants were trained on the use of ArthroFree and then used the device in a surgical procedure performed on a cadaver, simulated model, or patient. Their experience was evaluated in a 13-statement human factors survey scored using a 5-point Likert scale. ArthroFree scored well in all survey statements, scoring “good” or “excellent” (4.5 mean score), suggesting users’ needs were satisfied in 91.30% of participants. Additionally, one-on-one interviews with surgeons gathered qualitative feedback on their independent experience with the ArthroFree device, providing key support for its introduction to the operating room.","PeriodicalId":298624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation","volume":"12 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human Factors Usability Analysis of the ArthroFree Wireless Surgical Camera\",\"authors\":\"Pearl Griffin, Patrick Polito, Leah Brownlee, Jeff Ustin, Kipum Lee, Craig Conner\",\"doi\":\"10.60118/001c.87965\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conventional arthroscopy is performed with a narrow tube, the arthroscope, attached to a camera and two cables - one for power and one for fiber-optic light. The cables can be cumbersome, routed across or around the patient, and risk bridging the sterile and nonsterile fields. ArthroFree®, a wireless surgical camera for arthroscopy, features wireless communication and battery power and was designed to eliminate cable-associated burdens. An iterative product development process established the usability of ArthroFree. Feedback on ArthroFree’s design was received from 88 participants (82 surgeons and 6 other medical professionals) on ergonomics, ease of use, image quality, and patient experience following design validation testing (pre-FDA clearance; 76 participants) or clinical evaluation (post-FDA clearance; 12 participants). Participants were trained on the use of ArthroFree and then used the device in a surgical procedure performed on a cadaver, simulated model, or patient. Their experience was evaluated in a 13-statement human factors survey scored using a 5-point Likert scale. ArthroFree scored well in all survey statements, scoring “good” or “excellent” (4.5 mean score), suggesting users’ needs were satisfied in 91.30% of participants. Additionally, one-on-one interviews with surgeons gathered qualitative feedback on their independent experience with the ArthroFree device, providing key support for its introduction to the operating room.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation\",\"volume\":\"12 17\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.87965\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.87965","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

传统的关节镜检查使用一根窄管(即关节镜),连接着一台照相机和两根电缆(一根用于供电,一根用于光纤光)。这些电缆非常笨重,需要穿过或绕过病人,而且有可能在无菌区和非无菌区之间架起桥梁。ArthroFree® 是一种用于关节镜检查的无线手术相机,具有无线通信和电池供电功能,旨在消除电缆带来的负担。迭代产品开发流程确定了 ArthroFree 的可用性。在设计验证测试(FDA 批准前;76 位参与者)或临床评估(FDA 批准后;12 位参与者)之后,88 位参与者(82 位外科医生和 6 位其他医疗专业人员)就人体工程学、易用性、图像质量和患者体验等方面对 ArthroFree 的设计提出了反馈意见。参与者接受了 ArthroFree 的使用培训,然后在尸体、模拟模型或病人的手术过程中使用该设备。他们的体验由 13 项人为因素调查进行评估,采用 5 点李克特量表评分。ArthroFree 在所有调查语句中都获得了 "良好 "或 "优秀"(平均分 4.5 分)的好成绩,表明 91.30% 的参与者的需求得到了满足。此外,对外科医生进行的一对一访谈收集了他们对 ArthroFree 设备独立使用体验的定性反馈,为将该设备引入手术室提供了重要支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Human Factors Usability Analysis of the ArthroFree Wireless Surgical Camera
Conventional arthroscopy is performed with a narrow tube, the arthroscope, attached to a camera and two cables - one for power and one for fiber-optic light. The cables can be cumbersome, routed across or around the patient, and risk bridging the sterile and nonsterile fields. ArthroFree®, a wireless surgical camera for arthroscopy, features wireless communication and battery power and was designed to eliminate cable-associated burdens. An iterative product development process established the usability of ArthroFree. Feedback on ArthroFree’s design was received from 88 participants (82 surgeons and 6 other medical professionals) on ergonomics, ease of use, image quality, and patient experience following design validation testing (pre-FDA clearance; 76 participants) or clinical evaluation (post-FDA clearance; 12 participants). Participants were trained on the use of ArthroFree and then used the device in a surgical procedure performed on a cadaver, simulated model, or patient. Their experience was evaluated in a 13-statement human factors survey scored using a 5-point Likert scale. ArthroFree scored well in all survey statements, scoring “good” or “excellent” (4.5 mean score), suggesting users’ needs were satisfied in 91.30% of participants. Additionally, one-on-one interviews with surgeons gathered qualitative feedback on their independent experience with the ArthroFree device, providing key support for its introduction to the operating room.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信