双重犯罪和欧洲逮捕令:KL 案的当前趋势和未来发展

Gianmarco Bondi
{"title":"双重犯罪和欧洲逮捕令:KL 案的当前趋势和未来发展","authors":"Gianmarco Bondi","doi":"10.1177/20322844241228675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In line with its case-law, in the KL case the Court of Justice of the European Union further reduced the scope of the principle of double criminality in the European Arrest Warrant. This paper serves to critique this decision by taking into consideration the various competing issues at stake and resulting human rights repercussions. Furthermore, it examines the contents and consequences of the CJEU’s interpretation of the said principle, with particular emphasis on the concept of legal interest. Finally, by referring to the judgement in question and the one in the E.D.L. case, this essay advances a different reading of the proportionality of offences and penalties in surrender proceedings.","PeriodicalId":508076,"journal":{"name":"New Journal of European Criminal Law","volume":"8 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Double criminality and the European Arrest Warrant: current trends and future developments in light of the KL case\",\"authors\":\"Gianmarco Bondi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20322844241228675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In line with its case-law, in the KL case the Court of Justice of the European Union further reduced the scope of the principle of double criminality in the European Arrest Warrant. This paper serves to critique this decision by taking into consideration the various competing issues at stake and resulting human rights repercussions. Furthermore, it examines the contents and consequences of the CJEU’s interpretation of the said principle, with particular emphasis on the concept of legal interest. Finally, by referring to the judgement in question and the one in the E.D.L. case, this essay advances a different reading of the proportionality of offences and penalties in surrender proceedings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Journal of European Criminal Law\",\"volume\":\"8 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Journal of European Criminal Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844241228675\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Journal of European Criminal Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844241228675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据其判例法,欧盟法院在 KL 案中进一步缩小了欧洲逮捕令中双重犯罪原则的范围。本文旨在通过考虑各种利害攸关的竞争问题以及由此产生的人权影响,对这一决定进行批判。此外,本文还研究了欧盟法院对上述原则的解释的内容和后果,并特别强调了法律利益的概念。最后,通过参考相关判决和 E.D.L.案的判决,本文提出了对自首诉讼中罪行和刑罚相称性的不同解读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Double criminality and the European Arrest Warrant: current trends and future developments in light of the KL case
In line with its case-law, in the KL case the Court of Justice of the European Union further reduced the scope of the principle of double criminality in the European Arrest Warrant. This paper serves to critique this decision by taking into consideration the various competing issues at stake and resulting human rights repercussions. Furthermore, it examines the contents and consequences of the CJEU’s interpretation of the said principle, with particular emphasis on the concept of legal interest. Finally, by referring to the judgement in question and the one in the E.D.L. case, this essay advances a different reading of the proportionality of offences and penalties in surrender proceedings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信