四种方法筛选巨细胞病毒抗体在正常供体和免疫功能低下患者中的比较。

F de Ory, P León, C Domingo, A Garcia-Sáiz, L Pérez, J M Echevarría
{"title":"四种方法筛选巨细胞病毒抗体在正常供体和免疫功能低下患者中的比较。","authors":"F de Ory,&nbsp;P León,&nbsp;C Domingo,&nbsp;A Garcia-Sáiz,&nbsp;L Pérez,&nbsp;J M Echevarría","doi":"10.1007/BF02013094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three commercial methods (enzyme immunoassay, fluoroimmunoassay and latex agglutination) and a complement fixation test were compared for detection of cytomegalovirus antibodies using a panel of 490 serum samples from blood and organ donors, from immunocompromised patients and paired sera from five patients with recent cytomegalovirus infection. An indirect immunofluorescence test for antibodies to cytomegalovirus was used for classifying samples giving discrepant results by any of the four methods. All methods showed high sensitivity and specificity, but the enzyme immunoassay and the latex agglutination tests had the highest sensitivity. Latex agglutination is recommended for large-scale screening of cytomegalovirus antibodies in blood and organ donors. Negative results obtained by latex agglutination should be confirmed by sensitive enzyme immunoassays.</p>","PeriodicalId":11958,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02013094","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of four methods for screening of cytomegalovirus antibodies in normal donors and immunocompromised patients.\",\"authors\":\"F de Ory,&nbsp;P León,&nbsp;C Domingo,&nbsp;A Garcia-Sáiz,&nbsp;L Pérez,&nbsp;J M Echevarría\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/BF02013094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Three commercial methods (enzyme immunoassay, fluoroimmunoassay and latex agglutination) and a complement fixation test were compared for detection of cytomegalovirus antibodies using a panel of 490 serum samples from blood and organ donors, from immunocompromised patients and paired sera from five patients with recent cytomegalovirus infection. An indirect immunofluorescence test for antibodies to cytomegalovirus was used for classifying samples giving discrepant results by any of the four methods. All methods showed high sensitivity and specificity, but the enzyme immunoassay and the latex agglutination tests had the highest sensitivity. Latex agglutination is recommended for large-scale screening of cytomegalovirus antibodies in blood and organ donors. Negative results obtained by latex agglutination should be confirmed by sensitive enzyme immunoassays.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1987-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/BF02013094\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013094\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Clinical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02013094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究比较了三种商业方法(酶免疫测定法、氟免疫测定法和乳胶凝集法)和补体固定试验检测巨细胞病毒抗体的方法,使用490份来自血液和器官供者、免疫功能低下患者和5名近期巨细胞病毒感染患者的配对血清样本。对巨细胞病毒抗体的间接免疫荧光试验用于对样品进行分类,这四种方法中的任何一种都有不同的结果。所有方法均具有较高的敏感性和特异性,但酶免疫法和乳胶凝集法的敏感性最高。乳胶凝集被推荐用于血液和器官供者巨细胞病毒抗体的大规模筛选。胶乳凝集的阴性结果应通过灵敏的酶免疫测定来证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of four methods for screening of cytomegalovirus antibodies in normal donors and immunocompromised patients.

Three commercial methods (enzyme immunoassay, fluoroimmunoassay and latex agglutination) and a complement fixation test were compared for detection of cytomegalovirus antibodies using a panel of 490 serum samples from blood and organ donors, from immunocompromised patients and paired sera from five patients with recent cytomegalovirus infection. An indirect immunofluorescence test for antibodies to cytomegalovirus was used for classifying samples giving discrepant results by any of the four methods. All methods showed high sensitivity and specificity, but the enzyme immunoassay and the latex agglutination tests had the highest sensitivity. Latex agglutination is recommended for large-scale screening of cytomegalovirus antibodies in blood and organ donors. Negative results obtained by latex agglutination should be confirmed by sensitive enzyme immunoassays.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信