JMS 钻石周年快乐!管理研究》杂志十年分析

IF 7 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Sorin M. S. Krammer, Peter Dahlin, Jonathan P. Doh, Kristina Potočnik
{"title":"JMS 钻石周年快乐!管理研究》杂志十年分析","authors":"Sorin M. S. Krammer,&nbsp;Peter Dahlin,&nbsp;Jonathan P. Doh,&nbsp;Kristina Potočnik","doi":"10.1111/joms.13044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The <i>Journal of Management Studies</i>, founded in 1963, is celebrating its 60<sup>th</sup> year. Clark et al. (2014) conducted a bibliometric analysis for its 50<sup>th</sup> anniversary assessing whether the journal had maintained its leading international ranking and sustained its mission to serve as a broad-based management outlet. In this review, we build on and extend their findings by examining trends in the journal over the past decade (2012–22). We present a broader analysis of <i>JMS</i> by exploring its unique identity within the management journal ecosystem and examining its scope and breadth in terms of topics, methods, and author demographics to document <i>JMS</i>'s evolution, impact, reach, and accessibility. We develop a new bibliometric framework that employs a mix of qualitative and quantitative analyses (including regression, text, and language analysis) to cover a broad range of considerations for a journal and its stakeholders. In so doing, we contribute to the bibliometric and review research areas by proposing new metrics (related to diversity, equity, and inclusion) and analysis tools to assess the relative position of an academic journal. Employing this framework, we conclude that JMS has retained and enhanced its position as a leading, cutting-edge general management journal.</p>","PeriodicalId":48445,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Management Studies","volume":"61 4","pages":"1654-1682"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joms.13044","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Happy Diamond Anniversary JMS! A Decade Analysis of the Journal of Management Studies\",\"authors\":\"Sorin M. S. Krammer,&nbsp;Peter Dahlin,&nbsp;Jonathan P. Doh,&nbsp;Kristina Potočnik\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joms.13044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The <i>Journal of Management Studies</i>, founded in 1963, is celebrating its 60<sup>th</sup> year. Clark et al. (2014) conducted a bibliometric analysis for its 50<sup>th</sup> anniversary assessing whether the journal had maintained its leading international ranking and sustained its mission to serve as a broad-based management outlet. In this review, we build on and extend their findings by examining trends in the journal over the past decade (2012–22). We present a broader analysis of <i>JMS</i> by exploring its unique identity within the management journal ecosystem and examining its scope and breadth in terms of topics, methods, and author demographics to document <i>JMS</i>'s evolution, impact, reach, and accessibility. We develop a new bibliometric framework that employs a mix of qualitative and quantitative analyses (including regression, text, and language analysis) to cover a broad range of considerations for a journal and its stakeholders. In so doing, we contribute to the bibliometric and review research areas by proposing new metrics (related to diversity, equity, and inclusion) and analysis tools to assess the relative position of an academic journal. Employing this framework, we conclude that JMS has retained and enhanced its position as a leading, cutting-edge general management journal.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Management Studies\",\"volume\":\"61 4\",\"pages\":\"1654-1682\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joms.13044\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Management Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joms.13044\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joms.13044","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

管理研究期刊》创刊于 1963 年,今年迎来了创刊 60 周年。Clark 等人(2014 年)为《管理研究》创刊 50 周年进行了文献计量分析,评估该期刊是否保持了其领先的国际排名,并继续履行其作为基础广泛的管理刊物的使命。在本综述中,我们以他们的研究成果为基础并加以扩展,对该期刊在过去十年(2012-22 年)的发展趋势进行了研究。我们对《管理研究》进行了更广泛的分析,探讨了它在管理期刊生态系统中的独特身份,并从主题、方法和作者人口统计方面考察了它的范围和广度,从而记录了《管理研究》的演变、影响力、覆盖面和可读性。我们开发了一个新的文献计量框架,该框架综合运用了定性和定量分析(包括回归分析、文本分析和语言分析),涵盖了期刊及其利益相关者的广泛考虑因素。在此过程中,我们提出了新的衡量标准(与多样性、公平性和包容性相关)和分析工具来评估学术期刊的相对地位,从而为文献计量学和评论研究领域做出了贡献。利用这一框架,我们得出结论:《管理学家杂志》保持并提升了其作为领先的前沿综合管理期刊的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Happy Diamond Anniversary JMS! A Decade Analysis of the Journal of Management Studies

Happy Diamond Anniversary JMS! A Decade Analysis of the Journal of Management Studies

The Journal of Management Studies, founded in 1963, is celebrating its 60th year. Clark et al. (2014) conducted a bibliometric analysis for its 50th anniversary assessing whether the journal had maintained its leading international ranking and sustained its mission to serve as a broad-based management outlet. In this review, we build on and extend their findings by examining trends in the journal over the past decade (2012–22). We present a broader analysis of JMS by exploring its unique identity within the management journal ecosystem and examining its scope and breadth in terms of topics, methods, and author demographics to document JMS's evolution, impact, reach, and accessibility. We develop a new bibliometric framework that employs a mix of qualitative and quantitative analyses (including regression, text, and language analysis) to cover a broad range of considerations for a journal and its stakeholders. In so doing, we contribute to the bibliometric and review research areas by proposing new metrics (related to diversity, equity, and inclusion) and analysis tools to assess the relative position of an academic journal. Employing this framework, we conclude that JMS has retained and enhanced its position as a leading, cutting-edge general management journal.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.40
自引率
5.70%
发文量
99
期刊介绍: The Journal of Management Studies is a prestigious publication that specializes in multidisciplinary research in the field of business and management. With a rich history of excellence, we are dedicated to publishing innovative articles that contribute to the advancement of management and organization studies. Our journal welcomes empirical and conceptual contributions that are relevant to various areas including organization theory, organizational behavior, human resource management, strategy, international business, entrepreneurship, innovation, and critical management studies. We embrace diversity and are open to a wide range of methodological approaches and philosophical perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信