不同设施的工单处理调查:基于问卷的调查

IF 1.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Facilities Pub Date : 2024-01-30 DOI:10.1108/f-05-2023-0048
Mahnaz Ensafi, Walid Thabet, Deniz Besiktepe
{"title":"不同设施的工单处理调查:基于问卷的调查","authors":"Mahnaz Ensafi, Walid Thabet, Deniz Besiktepe","doi":"10.1108/f-05-2023-0048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The aim of this paper was to study current practices in FM work order processing to support and improve decision-making. Processing and prioritizing work orders constitute a critical part of facilities and maintenance management practices given the large amount of work orders submitted daily. User-driven approaches (UDAs) are currently more prevalent for processing and prioritizing work orders but have challenges including inconsistency and subjectivity. Data-driven approaches can provide an advantage over user-driven ones in work-order processing; however, specific data requirements need to be identified to collect and process the functional data needed while achieving more consistent and accurate results.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This paper presents the findings of an online survey conducted with facility management (FM) experts who are directly or indirectly involved in processing work orders in building maintenance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings reflect the current practices of 71 survey participants on data requirements, criteria selection, rankings, with current shortcomings and challenges in prioritizing work orders. In addition, differences between criteria and their ranking within participants’ experience, facility types and facility sizes are investigated. The findings of the study provide a snapshot of the current practices in FM work order processing, which aids in developing a comprehensive framework to support data-driven decision-making and address the challenges with UDAs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>Although previous studies have explored the use of selected criteria for processing and prioritizing work orders, this paper investigated a comprehensive list of criteria used by various facilities for processing work orders. Furthermore, previous studies are focused on the processing and prioritization stage, whereas this paper explored the data collected following the completion of the maintenance tasks and the benefits it can provide for processing future work orders. In addition, previous studies have focused on one specific stage of work order processing, whereas this paper investigated the common data between different stages of work order processing for enhanced FM.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47595,"journal":{"name":"Facilities","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of work order processing in different facilities: a questionnaire-based survey\",\"authors\":\"Mahnaz Ensafi, Walid Thabet, Deniz Besiktepe\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/f-05-2023-0048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>The aim of this paper was to study current practices in FM work order processing to support and improve decision-making. Processing and prioritizing work orders constitute a critical part of facilities and maintenance management practices given the large amount of work orders submitted daily. User-driven approaches (UDAs) are currently more prevalent for processing and prioritizing work orders but have challenges including inconsistency and subjectivity. Data-driven approaches can provide an advantage over user-driven ones in work-order processing; however, specific data requirements need to be identified to collect and process the functional data needed while achieving more consistent and accurate results.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>This paper presents the findings of an online survey conducted with facility management (FM) experts who are directly or indirectly involved in processing work orders in building maintenance.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The findings reflect the current practices of 71 survey participants on data requirements, criteria selection, rankings, with current shortcomings and challenges in prioritizing work orders. In addition, differences between criteria and their ranking within participants’ experience, facility types and facility sizes are investigated. The findings of the study provide a snapshot of the current practices in FM work order processing, which aids in developing a comprehensive framework to support data-driven decision-making and address the challenges with UDAs.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>Although previous studies have explored the use of selected criteria for processing and prioritizing work orders, this paper investigated a comprehensive list of criteria used by various facilities for processing work orders. Furthermore, previous studies are focused on the processing and prioritization stage, whereas this paper explored the data collected following the completion of the maintenance tasks and the benefits it can provide for processing future work orders. In addition, previous studies have focused on one specific stage of work order processing, whereas this paper investigated the common data between different stages of work order processing for enhanced FM.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Facilities\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Facilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/f-05-2023-0048\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/f-05-2023-0048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本文旨在研究设施与维护工单处理的现行做法,以支持和改进决策。鉴于每天提交的工单数量庞大,处理工单和确定工单优先次序是设施和维护管理实践的关键部分。目前,用户驱动法(UDA)在处理工单和确定工单优先级方面较为普遍,但也存在不一致和主观性等问题。本文介绍了对直接或间接参与处理建筑维护工单的设施管理(FM)专家进行在线调查的结果。调查结果反映了 71 位调查参与者目前在数据要求、标准选择、排序方面的做法,以及目前在确定工单优先级方面的不足和挑战。此外,还调查了不同经验、设施类型和设施规模的参与者在标准及其排序方面的差异。研究结果提供了当前设施管理工单处理实践的一个缩影,有助于制定一个综合框架,以支持数据驱动决策和应对 UDAs 所带来的挑战。原创性/价值虽然之前的研究探讨了使用选定标准来处理工单和确定优先次序的问题,但本文调查了各种设施在处理工单时使用的综合标准清单。此外,以往的研究主要集中在处理和优先排序阶段,而本文则探讨了在维护任务完成后收集的数据及其对处理未来工单的益处。此外,以往的研究侧重于工单处理的某一特定阶段,而本文则调查了工单处理不同阶段之间的共同数据,以增强 FM 功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of work order processing in different facilities: a questionnaire-based survey

Purpose

The aim of this paper was to study current practices in FM work order processing to support and improve decision-making. Processing and prioritizing work orders constitute a critical part of facilities and maintenance management practices given the large amount of work orders submitted daily. User-driven approaches (UDAs) are currently more prevalent for processing and prioritizing work orders but have challenges including inconsistency and subjectivity. Data-driven approaches can provide an advantage over user-driven ones in work-order processing; however, specific data requirements need to be identified to collect and process the functional data needed while achieving more consistent and accurate results.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper presents the findings of an online survey conducted with facility management (FM) experts who are directly or indirectly involved in processing work orders in building maintenance.

Findings

The findings reflect the current practices of 71 survey participants on data requirements, criteria selection, rankings, with current shortcomings and challenges in prioritizing work orders. In addition, differences between criteria and their ranking within participants’ experience, facility types and facility sizes are investigated. The findings of the study provide a snapshot of the current practices in FM work order processing, which aids in developing a comprehensive framework to support data-driven decision-making and address the challenges with UDAs.

Originality/value

Although previous studies have explored the use of selected criteria for processing and prioritizing work orders, this paper investigated a comprehensive list of criteria used by various facilities for processing work orders. Furthermore, previous studies are focused on the processing and prioritization stage, whereas this paper explored the data collected following the completion of the maintenance tasks and the benefits it can provide for processing future work orders. In addition, previous studies have focused on one specific stage of work order processing, whereas this paper investigated the common data between different stages of work order processing for enhanced FM.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Facilities
Facilities MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The journal offers thorough, independent and expert papers to inform relevant audiences of thinking and practice in the field, including topics such as: ■Intelligent buildings ■Post-occupancy evaluation (building evaluation) ■Relocation and change management ■Sick building syndrome ■Ergonomics and workplace design ■Environmental and workplace psychology ■Briefing, design and construction ■Energy consumption ■Quality initiatives ■Infrastructure management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信