语法交替词的习得:意大利语和挪威语属格词的比较

Marta Velnić
{"title":"语法交替词的习得:意大利语和挪威语属格词的比较","authors":"Marta Velnić","doi":"10.1007/s10828-023-09150-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Possessive alternates (prenominal and postnominal) have mirrored properties in Italian and Norwegian when taking into consideration frequency, derivation, and markedness; i.e., the variant that is base-generated in one language is considered the derived one in the other language. Thus, in both languages there is a variant used for unmarked contexts (i.e., topic) and for marked contexts (i.e., contrast). Previous studies have shown that Italian children acquire the use of the variants with ease, whereas Norwegian children were found to overuse the marked variant, even in unmarked contexts. Here, we reanalyse the co-occurrences of the possessive and the noun in the monolingual corpora for the two languages available on CHILDES, by focusing more attentively on the contextual use of the variants, to reveal whether the same principles underly the acquisition process. Our findings contradict the previous claims on the acquisition of Italian but are in line with the previous findings for Norwegian. Both groups of children overuse the marked but base-generated variant, indicating the relevance of syntactic economy in language acquisition.</p>","PeriodicalId":75059,"journal":{"name":"The journal of comparative Germanic linguistics","volume":"124 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The acquisition of grammatical alternates: a comparison of Italian and Norwegian possessives\",\"authors\":\"Marta Velnić\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10828-023-09150-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Possessive alternates (prenominal and postnominal) have mirrored properties in Italian and Norwegian when taking into consideration frequency, derivation, and markedness; i.e., the variant that is base-generated in one language is considered the derived one in the other language. Thus, in both languages there is a variant used for unmarked contexts (i.e., topic) and for marked contexts (i.e., contrast). Previous studies have shown that Italian children acquire the use of the variants with ease, whereas Norwegian children were found to overuse the marked variant, even in unmarked contexts. Here, we reanalyse the co-occurrences of the possessive and the noun in the monolingual corpora for the two languages available on CHILDES, by focusing more attentively on the contextual use of the variants, to reveal whether the same principles underly the acquisition process. Our findings contradict the previous claims on the acquisition of Italian but are in line with the previous findings for Norwegian. Both groups of children overuse the marked but base-generated variant, indicating the relevance of syntactic economy in language acquisition.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The journal of comparative Germanic linguistics\",\"volume\":\"124 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The journal of comparative Germanic linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-023-09150-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of comparative Germanic linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-023-09150-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在意大利语和挪威语中,如果考虑到频率、派生和标记性,占有词交替词(前名和后名)具有镜像特性;也就是说,在一种语言中基本产生的变体在另一种语言中被认为是派生的变体。因此,在这两种语言中,都有一种变体用于无标记语境(即话题)和有标记语境(即对比)。以往的研究表明,意大利儿童很容易掌握变体的使用,而挪威儿童则过度使用有标记的变体,甚至在无标记的语境中也是如此。在此,我们重新分析了CHILDES网站上两种语言的单语语料库中占有词和名词的共同出现情况,更加关注变体的语境使用,以揭示习得过程中是否存在相同的原则。我们的研究结果与以前关于意大利语习得的说法相矛盾,但与以前关于挪威语的研究结果相一致。两组儿童都过度使用了有标记但由基数产生的变体,这表明句法经济在语言习得中的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The acquisition of grammatical alternates: a comparison of Italian and Norwegian possessives

The acquisition of grammatical alternates: a comparison of Italian and Norwegian possessives

Possessive alternates (prenominal and postnominal) have mirrored properties in Italian and Norwegian when taking into consideration frequency, derivation, and markedness; i.e., the variant that is base-generated in one language is considered the derived one in the other language. Thus, in both languages there is a variant used for unmarked contexts (i.e., topic) and for marked contexts (i.e., contrast). Previous studies have shown that Italian children acquire the use of the variants with ease, whereas Norwegian children were found to overuse the marked variant, even in unmarked contexts. Here, we reanalyse the co-occurrences of the possessive and the noun in the monolingual corpora for the two languages available on CHILDES, by focusing more attentively on the contextual use of the variants, to reveal whether the same principles underly the acquisition process. Our findings contradict the previous claims on the acquisition of Italian but are in line with the previous findings for Norwegian. Both groups of children overuse the marked but base-generated variant, indicating the relevance of syntactic economy in language acquisition.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信