以大肠杆菌分离物为目标模型评估抗菌药敏感性的方法的一致性。

IF 2 4区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Milimani Andretta, Rafaela de Melo Tavares, Andressa Fusieger, Ricardo Seiti Yamatogi, Luís Augusto Nero
{"title":"以大肠杆菌分离物为目标模型评估抗菌药敏感性的方法的一致性。","authors":"Milimani Andretta, Rafaela de Melo Tavares, Andressa Fusieger, Ricardo Seiti Yamatogi, Luís Augusto Nero","doi":"10.1093/lambio/ovae009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antimicrobial susceptibility tests (AST) conducted in vitro offer a range of methods to assess the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of microorganisms. Escherichia coli, a widely distributed bacterium, is closely linked to the issue of AMR. In this way, the present study aimed to assess the agreement among different in vitro AST methods, including disk diffusion in agar, broth dilution, and agar dilution method. A total of 100 E. coli isolates were analyzed for their resistance levels against six antibiotics: amoxicillin, ceftiofur, ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim, using the aforementioned AST methods. Standard breakpoint values were employed to classify isolates as resistant, intermediate, or susceptible, and comparisons among the AST methods were conducted by McNemar's test (P < .05). The obtained data demonstrated equivalence among the AST methods, highlighting the reliability of these standardized classical methodologies. This standardization aids in preventing the inappropriate use of antimicrobials and the dissemination of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":17962,"journal":{"name":"Letters in Applied Microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement of methods to assess antimicrobial susceptibility using Escherichia coli isolates as target models.\",\"authors\":\"Milimani Andretta, Rafaela de Melo Tavares, Andressa Fusieger, Ricardo Seiti Yamatogi, Luís Augusto Nero\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/lambio/ovae009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Antimicrobial susceptibility tests (AST) conducted in vitro offer a range of methods to assess the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of microorganisms. Escherichia coli, a widely distributed bacterium, is closely linked to the issue of AMR. In this way, the present study aimed to assess the agreement among different in vitro AST methods, including disk diffusion in agar, broth dilution, and agar dilution method. A total of 100 E. coli isolates were analyzed for their resistance levels against six antibiotics: amoxicillin, ceftiofur, ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim, using the aforementioned AST methods. Standard breakpoint values were employed to classify isolates as resistant, intermediate, or susceptible, and comparisons among the AST methods were conducted by McNemar's test (P < .05). The obtained data demonstrated equivalence among the AST methods, highlighting the reliability of these standardized classical methodologies. This standardization aids in preventing the inappropriate use of antimicrobials and the dissemination of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17962,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Letters in Applied Microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Letters in Applied Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/lambio/ovae009\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Letters in Applied Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/lambio/ovae009","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

体外进行的抗菌药物敏感性试验(AST)提供了一系列评估微生物抗菌药物耐药性(AMR)的方法。大肠杆菌是一种广泛分布的细菌,与 AMR 问题密切相关。因此,本研究旨在评估不同体外 AST 方法(包括琼脂盘扩散法、肉汤稀释法和琼脂稀释法)之间的一致性。本研究使用上述 AST 方法分析了共 100 株大肠杆菌分离物对六种抗生素的耐药性水平:阿莫西林、头孢噻呋、环丙沙星、氯霉素、四环素和磺胺甲恶唑+三甲氧苄啶。采用标准断点值将分离物分为耐药、中度耐药或易感,并通过 McNemars 检验对 AST 方法进行比较(p<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Agreement of methods to assess antimicrobial susceptibility using Escherichia coli isolates as target models.

Antimicrobial susceptibility tests (AST) conducted in vitro offer a range of methods to assess the antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of microorganisms. Escherichia coli, a widely distributed bacterium, is closely linked to the issue of AMR. In this way, the present study aimed to assess the agreement among different in vitro AST methods, including disk diffusion in agar, broth dilution, and agar dilution method. A total of 100 E. coli isolates were analyzed for their resistance levels against six antibiotics: amoxicillin, ceftiofur, ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim, using the aforementioned AST methods. Standard breakpoint values were employed to classify isolates as resistant, intermediate, or susceptible, and comparisons among the AST methods were conducted by McNemar's test (P < .05). The obtained data demonstrated equivalence among the AST methods, highlighting the reliability of these standardized classical methodologies. This standardization aids in preventing the inappropriate use of antimicrobials and the dissemination of antimicrobial-resistant microorganisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Letters in Applied Microbiology
Letters in Applied Microbiology 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
225
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of & Letters in Applied Microbiology are two of the flagship research journals of the Society for Applied Microbiology (SfAM). For more than 75 years they have been publishing top quality research and reviews in the broad field of applied microbiology. The journals are provided to all SfAM members as well as having a global online readership totalling more than 500,000 downloads per year in more than 200 countries. Submitting authors can expect fast decision and publication times, averaging 33 days to first decision and 34 days from acceptance to online publication. There are no page charges.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信