硅酸钙水门汀填充牙根时细菌通过牙本质小管的体外渗透和传播。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Peter Pham BOHDSc, GDipDent(GU), DClinDentEndo(UWA), MRACDS(Endo), Paul V. Abbott BDSc, MDS, DDSc, FRACDS(Endo)
{"title":"硅酸钙水门汀填充牙根时细菌通过牙本质小管的体外渗透和传播。","authors":"Peter Pham BOHDSc, GDipDent(GU), DClinDentEndo(UWA), MRACDS(Endo),&nbsp;Paul V. Abbott BDSc, MDS, DDSc, FRACDS(Endo)","doi":"10.1111/aej.12832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The aim of this study was to assess whether calcium silicate root fillings prevent bacterial penetration and to determine how bacteria penetrate roots. Extracted single-rooted, single-canal human teeth were decoronated, prepared and filled with ProRootMTA or Biodentine (<i>n</i> = 12 each). Positive and negative (<i>n</i> = 2 each) controls were not filled. A two-chamber model was used with <i>Streptococcus gordonii.</i> The lower compartment was evaluated for turbidity over 150 days. Roots were split and examined for bacteria via SEM. The chi-squared test was used for comparisons (<i>α</i> = 0.05). Experimental groups had bacteria in their coronal thirds. Tubules contained bacteria in 90.9% and 91.7% of areas examined in the Biodentine and ProRootMTA groups, respectively, with no significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.914). Experimental and negative roots had no turbidity with no significant difference between Biodentine and ProRootMTA (<i>p</i> = 1.000). Positive controls had turbidity. Bacteria penetrate roots via dentine tubules of root-filled teeth. Biodentine was comparable to ProRoot MTA.</p>","PeriodicalId":55581,"journal":{"name":"Australian Endodontic Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aej.12832","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In vitro bacterial penetration and dissemination through dentinal tubules in roots filled with calcium silicate-based cements\",\"authors\":\"Peter Pham BOHDSc, GDipDent(GU), DClinDentEndo(UWA), MRACDS(Endo),&nbsp;Paul V. Abbott BDSc, MDS, DDSc, FRACDS(Endo)\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aej.12832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The aim of this study was to assess whether calcium silicate root fillings prevent bacterial penetration and to determine how bacteria penetrate roots. Extracted single-rooted, single-canal human teeth were decoronated, prepared and filled with ProRootMTA or Biodentine (<i>n</i> = 12 each). Positive and negative (<i>n</i> = 2 each) controls were not filled. A two-chamber model was used with <i>Streptococcus gordonii.</i> The lower compartment was evaluated for turbidity over 150 days. Roots were split and examined for bacteria via SEM. The chi-squared test was used for comparisons (<i>α</i> = 0.05). Experimental groups had bacteria in their coronal thirds. Tubules contained bacteria in 90.9% and 91.7% of areas examined in the Biodentine and ProRootMTA groups, respectively, with no significant difference (<i>p</i> = 0.914). Experimental and negative roots had no turbidity with no significant difference between Biodentine and ProRootMTA (<i>p</i> = 1.000). Positive controls had turbidity. Bacteria penetrate roots via dentine tubules of root-filled teeth. Biodentine was comparable to ProRoot MTA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Endodontic Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aej.12832\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Endodontic Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aej.12832\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Endodontic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aej.12832","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估硅酸钙牙根填充物是否能防止细菌穿透,并确定细菌是如何穿透牙根的。对拔出的单根单冠人类牙齿进行装饰、制备并填充 ProRootMTA 或 Biodentine(各 12 个)。阳性对照组和阴性对照组(各 2 个)未进行填充。戈登链球菌采用双室模型。在 150 天内对下层进行浑浊度评估。将根茎分开,通过扫描电镜检查细菌。比较采用卡方检验(α = 0.05)。实验组冠状面三分之一处有细菌。在 Biodentine 组和 ProRootMTA 组中,分别有 90.9% 和 91.7% 的受检区域的小管含有细菌,差异不显著(p = 0.914)。实验根和阴性根无浑浊现象,Biodentine 和 ProRootMTA 之间无显著差异(p = 1.000)。阳性对照有浑浊现象。细菌通过充满牙根的牙本质小管渗入牙根。Biodentine 与 ProRoot MTA 的效果相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

In vitro bacterial penetration and dissemination through dentinal tubules in roots filled with calcium silicate-based cements

In vitro bacterial penetration and dissemination through dentinal tubules in roots filled with calcium silicate-based cements

The aim of this study was to assess whether calcium silicate root fillings prevent bacterial penetration and to determine how bacteria penetrate roots. Extracted single-rooted, single-canal human teeth were decoronated, prepared and filled with ProRootMTA or Biodentine (n = 12 each). Positive and negative (n = 2 each) controls were not filled. A two-chamber model was used with Streptococcus gordonii. The lower compartment was evaluated for turbidity over 150 days. Roots were split and examined for bacteria via SEM. The chi-squared test was used for comparisons (α = 0.05). Experimental groups had bacteria in their coronal thirds. Tubules contained bacteria in 90.9% and 91.7% of areas examined in the Biodentine and ProRootMTA groups, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.914). Experimental and negative roots had no turbidity with no significant difference between Biodentine and ProRootMTA (p = 1.000). Positive controls had turbidity. Bacteria penetrate roots via dentine tubules of root-filled teeth. Biodentine was comparable to ProRoot MTA.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Endodontic Journal
Australian Endodontic Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
6.20%
发文量
99
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian Endodontic Journal provides a forum for communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for all specialists and dentists with an interest in the morphology, physiology, and pathology of the human tooth, in particular the dental pulp, root and peri-radicular tissues. The Journal features regular clinical updates, research reports and case reports from authors worldwide, and also publishes meeting abstracts, society news and historical endodontic glimpses. The Australian Endodontic Journal is a publication for dentists in general and specialist practice devoted solely to endodontics. It aims to promote communication in the different fields that encompass endodontics for those dentists who have a special interest in endodontics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信