动态能力测量野生动物园:路线图

IF 7.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Olga Bruyaka, Christiane Prange, Hua Ariel Li
{"title":"动态能力测量野生动物园:路线图","authors":"Olga Bruyaka,&nbsp;Christiane Prange,&nbsp;Hua Ariel Li","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.12364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lack of transparency about conceptual and measurement choices in empirical studies on dynamic capabilities (DCs) amplifies difficulties scholars face on the road to conducting high-quality quantitative research. Building on the best practices of construct operationalization developed in the organizational research methods literature, we review 18 review studies on DCs research and conduct our own review of 185 quantitative studies published in 1994–2022 through the lens of an auxiliary theory development that formalizes and structures the process of translating a concept into a measurable construct. The present paper draws scholars’ attention to the importance of carefully choosing DCs measurement models as a consequential decision in DCs operationalization, which complements existing studies that either reviewed DCs conceptualizations or developed scales and measures of DCs. Besides providing scholars with an up-to-date map of quantitative research on DCs, our paper includes recommendations for consistent operationalization of DCs and identifies best operationalization practices in DCs quantitative research. Overall, the present paper advances DCs research by clarifying the construct of DCs, which is especially pertinent for future research in this area as it should strive towards robust advancement.</p>","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"26 4","pages":"495-517"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic capabilities measurement safari: A roadmap\",\"authors\":\"Olga Bruyaka,&nbsp;Christiane Prange,&nbsp;Hua Ariel Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijmr.12364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Lack of transparency about conceptual and measurement choices in empirical studies on dynamic capabilities (DCs) amplifies difficulties scholars face on the road to conducting high-quality quantitative research. Building on the best practices of construct operationalization developed in the organizational research methods literature, we review 18 review studies on DCs research and conduct our own review of 185 quantitative studies published in 1994–2022 through the lens of an auxiliary theory development that formalizes and structures the process of translating a concept into a measurable construct. The present paper draws scholars’ attention to the importance of carefully choosing DCs measurement models as a consequential decision in DCs operationalization, which complements existing studies that either reviewed DCs conceptualizations or developed scales and measures of DCs. Besides providing scholars with an up-to-date map of quantitative research on DCs, our paper includes recommendations for consistent operationalization of DCs and identifies best operationalization practices in DCs quantitative research. Overall, the present paper advances DCs research by clarifying the construct of DCs, which is especially pertinent for future research in this area as it should strive towards robust advancement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Management Reviews\",\"volume\":\"26 4\",\"pages\":\"495-517\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Management Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijmr.12364\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ijmr.12364","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

动态能力(DC)实证研究中的概念和测量选择缺乏透明度,这加大了学者们在开展高质量定量研究的道路上所面临的困难。我们以组织研究方法文献中提出的建构操作化最佳实践为基础,回顾了 18 篇关于动态能力研究的综述研究,并通过辅助理论发展的视角,对 1994-2022 年间发表的 185 篇定量研究进行了自己的回顾,该理论将概念转化为可测量建构的过程正规化、结构化。本文提请学者们注意谨慎选择区委测量模型的重要性,这是区委可操作性的一个重要决定,它是对现有研究的补充,这些研究要么回顾了区委的概念化,要么开发了区委的量表和测量方法。除了为学者们提供有关 DCs 定量研究的最新地图之外,我们的论文还包括有关 DCs 统一操作化的建议,并确定了 DCs 定量研究中的最佳操作化实践。总之,本文通过阐明 DCs 的概念推进了 DCs 研究,这对该领域的未来研究尤为重要,因为该领域的研究应努力取得强劲进展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dynamic capabilities measurement safari: A roadmap

Lack of transparency about conceptual and measurement choices in empirical studies on dynamic capabilities (DCs) amplifies difficulties scholars face on the road to conducting high-quality quantitative research. Building on the best practices of construct operationalization developed in the organizational research methods literature, we review 18 review studies on DCs research and conduct our own review of 185 quantitative studies published in 1994–2022 through the lens of an auxiliary theory development that formalizes and structures the process of translating a concept into a measurable construct. The present paper draws scholars’ attention to the importance of carefully choosing DCs measurement models as a consequential decision in DCs operationalization, which complements existing studies that either reviewed DCs conceptualizations or developed scales and measures of DCs. Besides providing scholars with an up-to-date map of quantitative research on DCs, our paper includes recommendations for consistent operationalization of DCs and identifies best operationalization practices in DCs quantitative research. Overall, the present paper advances DCs research by clarifying the construct of DCs, which is especially pertinent for future research in this area as it should strive towards robust advancement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Management Reviews (IJMR) stands as the premier global review journal in Organisation and Management Studies (OMS). Its published papers aim to provide substantial conceptual contributions, acting as a strategic platform for new research directions. IJMR plays a pivotal role in influencing how OMS scholars conceptualize research in their respective fields. The journal's reviews critically assess the state of knowledge in specific fields, appraising the conceptual foundations of competing paradigms to advance current and future research in the area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信