用于监测野生物种与海洋水产养殖地点关联的数据收集方法综述

IF 8.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
Greg English, Michael J. Lawrence, Christopher W. McKindsey, Anaïs Lacoursière-Roussel, Hannah Bergeron, Stéphane Gauthier, Brendan F. Wringe, Marc Trudel
{"title":"用于监测野生物种与海洋水产养殖地点关联的数据收集方法综述","authors":"Greg English,&nbsp;Michael J. Lawrence,&nbsp;Christopher W. McKindsey,&nbsp;Anaïs Lacoursière-Roussel,&nbsp;Hannah Bergeron,&nbsp;Stéphane Gauthier,&nbsp;Brendan F. Wringe,&nbsp;Marc Trudel","doi":"10.1111/raq.12890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Aquaculture contributes a significant portion of the global aquatic biomass destined for human consumption. Bivalve and marine finfish aquaculture operations require sea-based farm sites that result in considerable interactions with the natural environment. The addition of feed waste and physical structures (e.g., net pens and longline mussel culture) can provide an attractive artificial reef for many species and studies have shown both positive and negative effects on the surrounding ecosystem due to wild species interactions with aquaculture sites. Assessing these interactions can be complex, depending on the local ecosystem, and several monitoring techniques have been used to accurately determine associations of wild finfish and decapods to marine farms. In this review, we assessed the main methods used to monitor aquaculture-ecosystem interactions. The advantages and disadvantages of each technique are discussed and suggestions to mitigate shortfalls for future studies are outlined. It was evident that combining methodologies should be prioritised to lessen the impact of identified weaknesses of any given approach. Designing studies with complementary approaches may help attain robust data that can be used to further understand aquaculture-ecosystem interactions and the underlying proximate mechanisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":227,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in Aquaculture","volume":"16 3","pages":"1160-1185"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/raq.12890","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review of data collection methods used to monitor the associations of wild species with marine aquaculture sites\",\"authors\":\"Greg English,&nbsp;Michael J. Lawrence,&nbsp;Christopher W. McKindsey,&nbsp;Anaïs Lacoursière-Roussel,&nbsp;Hannah Bergeron,&nbsp;Stéphane Gauthier,&nbsp;Brendan F. Wringe,&nbsp;Marc Trudel\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/raq.12890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Aquaculture contributes a significant portion of the global aquatic biomass destined for human consumption. Bivalve and marine finfish aquaculture operations require sea-based farm sites that result in considerable interactions with the natural environment. The addition of feed waste and physical structures (e.g., net pens and longline mussel culture) can provide an attractive artificial reef for many species and studies have shown both positive and negative effects on the surrounding ecosystem due to wild species interactions with aquaculture sites. Assessing these interactions can be complex, depending on the local ecosystem, and several monitoring techniques have been used to accurately determine associations of wild finfish and decapods to marine farms. In this review, we assessed the main methods used to monitor aquaculture-ecosystem interactions. The advantages and disadvantages of each technique are discussed and suggestions to mitigate shortfalls for future studies are outlined. It was evident that combining methodologies should be prioritised to lessen the impact of identified weaknesses of any given approach. Designing studies with complementary approaches may help attain robust data that can be used to further understand aquaculture-ecosystem interactions and the underlying proximate mechanisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in Aquaculture\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"1160-1185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/raq.12890\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in Aquaculture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/raq.12890\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in Aquaculture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/raq.12890","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球供人类消费的水生生物量中,水产养殖占了很大一部分。双壳贝类和海洋鱼类水产养殖需要海基养殖场地,从而与自然环境产生大量的相互作用。添加饲料废物和物理结构(如网箱和延绳贻贝养殖)可为许多物种提供有吸引力的人工鱼礁,研究表明,野生物种与水产养殖场的相互作用对周围生态系统既有积极影响,也有消极影响。评估这些相互作用可能很复杂,这取决于当地的生态系统,有几种监测技术已被用于准确确定野生有鳍鱼类和十足目动物与海洋养殖场的关联。在本综述中,我们评估了用于监测水产养殖与生态系统相互作用的主要方法。文中讨论了每种技术的优缺点,并概述了减轻未来研究不足的建议。很明显,应优先考虑将各种方法结合起来,以减轻任何特定方法的弱点所造成的影响。设计具有互补性方法的研究有助于获得可靠数据,可用于进一步了解水产养殖与 生态系统之间的相互作用和潜在的近似机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A review of data collection methods used to monitor the associations of wild species with marine aquaculture sites

A review of data collection methods used to monitor the associations of wild species with marine aquaculture sites

Aquaculture contributes a significant portion of the global aquatic biomass destined for human consumption. Bivalve and marine finfish aquaculture operations require sea-based farm sites that result in considerable interactions with the natural environment. The addition of feed waste and physical structures (e.g., net pens and longline mussel culture) can provide an attractive artificial reef for many species and studies have shown both positive and negative effects on the surrounding ecosystem due to wild species interactions with aquaculture sites. Assessing these interactions can be complex, depending on the local ecosystem, and several monitoring techniques have been used to accurately determine associations of wild finfish and decapods to marine farms. In this review, we assessed the main methods used to monitor aquaculture-ecosystem interactions. The advantages and disadvantages of each technique are discussed and suggestions to mitigate shortfalls for future studies are outlined. It was evident that combining methodologies should be prioritised to lessen the impact of identified weaknesses of any given approach. Designing studies with complementary approaches may help attain robust data that can be used to further understand aquaculture-ecosystem interactions and the underlying proximate mechanisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.80
自引率
5.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Reviews in Aquaculture is a journal that aims to provide a platform for reviews on various aspects of aquaculture science, techniques, policies, and planning. The journal publishes fully peer-reviewed review articles on topics including global, regional, and national production and market trends in aquaculture, advancements in aquaculture practices and technology, interactions between aquaculture and the environment, indigenous and alien species in aquaculture, genetics and its relation to aquaculture, as well as aquaculture product quality and traceability. The journal is indexed and abstracted in several databases including AgBiotech News & Information (CABI), AgBiotechNet, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, Environment Index (EBSCO Publishing), SCOPUS (Elsevier), and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics) among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信