使用临时牙髓封闭材料封闭的根管出现微渗漏

Rajaa T .Sulieman
{"title":"使用临时牙髓封闭材料封闭的根管出现微渗漏","authors":"Rajaa T .Sulieman","doi":"10.25130/tjds.2013.1.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To measure the microleakage of different materials used as temporary endodontic sealing materials and to compare between them. Sixty sound human premolars extracted for orthodontic purpose, caries and cracks free were used. Teeth were divided into 6 groups depending on type of temporary materials (glass ionomer cement, zinc phosphate cement, amalgam, temporary filling \"zinc oxide eugenol\") for temporization and control groups (negative and positive). For each tooth, an access opening was done followed by instrumentation, irrigation and dryness. Then application of different temporary materials. Evaluation of marginal microleakag e (tooth – restoration interface) were done by using dye penetration test. The study was done in Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul. The results showed significant differences (p< 0.05) in marginal microleakage among groups tested. But there were no significant difference between buccal and lingual tooth restoration – interface for each group. Glass i onomer cement showed less microleakage at tooth – restoration interface when compared with other temporary filling mater ials which used in this study. Glass ionomer cement has sup erioer effect on reduction of microleakage when compared with other temporary filling,when used for temporization had more ability to reduce microleakage than zinc phosphate cement, amal gam and lastly temporary filling (zinc oxide eugenol).","PeriodicalId":512116,"journal":{"name":"Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences","volume":"2 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microleakage of Root Canal Sealed with Temporary Endodontic Sealing Materials\",\"authors\":\"Rajaa T .Sulieman\",\"doi\":\"10.25130/tjds.2013.1.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To measure the microleakage of different materials used as temporary endodontic sealing materials and to compare between them. Sixty sound human premolars extracted for orthodontic purpose, caries and cracks free were used. Teeth were divided into 6 groups depending on type of temporary materials (glass ionomer cement, zinc phosphate cement, amalgam, temporary filling \\\"zinc oxide eugenol\\\") for temporization and control groups (negative and positive). For each tooth, an access opening was done followed by instrumentation, irrigation and dryness. Then application of different temporary materials. Evaluation of marginal microleakag e (tooth – restoration interface) were done by using dye penetration test. The study was done in Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul. The results showed significant differences (p< 0.05) in marginal microleakage among groups tested. But there were no significant difference between buccal and lingual tooth restoration – interface for each group. Glass i onomer cement showed less microleakage at tooth – restoration interface when compared with other temporary filling mater ials which used in this study. Glass ionomer cement has sup erioer effect on reduction of microleakage when compared with other temporary filling,when used for temporization had more ability to reduce microleakage than zinc phosphate cement, amal gam and lastly temporary filling (zinc oxide eugenol).\",\"PeriodicalId\":512116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences\",\"volume\":\"2 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25130/tjds.2013.1.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25130/tjds.2013.1.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

测量用作临时牙髓密封材料的不同材料的微渗漏情况,并对它们进行比较。使用了 60 颗为正畸目的拔出的无龋无裂的健全人类前臼齿。根据临时材料的类型(玻璃离子粘固剂、磷酸锌粘固剂、汞合金、"氧化锌丁香酚 "临时充填剂),牙齿被分为 6 组,对照组(阴性和阳性)。对每颗牙齿都要打开一个通道,然后进行器械操作、冲洗和干燥。然后使用不同的临时材料。使用染料渗透测试对边缘微渗漏(牙齿-修复体界面)进行评估。这项研究是在摩苏尔大学牙科学院保守牙科系进行的。结果显示,各测试组之间的边缘微渗漏存在明显差异(P< 0.05)。但各组的颊舌面牙齿修复界面之间没有明显差异。与本研究中使用的其他临时充填材料相比,玻璃离子水泥在牙齿-修复体界面的微渗漏较少。与其他临时充填材料相比,玻璃离子水门汀在减少微渗漏方面的效果更好,用于临时充填时,玻璃离子水门汀比磷酸锌水门汀、阿玛尔伽和最后一种临时充填材料(氧化锌丁香酚)更能减少微渗漏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Microleakage of Root Canal Sealed with Temporary Endodontic Sealing Materials
To measure the microleakage of different materials used as temporary endodontic sealing materials and to compare between them. Sixty sound human premolars extracted for orthodontic purpose, caries and cracks free were used. Teeth were divided into 6 groups depending on type of temporary materials (glass ionomer cement, zinc phosphate cement, amalgam, temporary filling "zinc oxide eugenol") for temporization and control groups (negative and positive). For each tooth, an access opening was done followed by instrumentation, irrigation and dryness. Then application of different temporary materials. Evaluation of marginal microleakag e (tooth – restoration interface) were done by using dye penetration test. The study was done in Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Mosul. The results showed significant differences (p< 0.05) in marginal microleakage among groups tested. But there were no significant difference between buccal and lingual tooth restoration – interface for each group. Glass i onomer cement showed less microleakage at tooth – restoration interface when compared with other temporary filling mater ials which used in this study. Glass ionomer cement has sup erioer effect on reduction of microleakage when compared with other temporary filling,when used for temporization had more ability to reduce microleakage than zinc phosphate cement, amal gam and lastly temporary filling (zinc oxide eugenol).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信