使用疼痛评分量表和功能量表作为结果工具,比较麦肯锡方法和腰椎核心稳定运动在改善腰椎病功能活动和减轻疼痛方面的效果

Karthick D, Ramana K, Kamalakannan M, Anitha A
{"title":"使用疼痛评分量表和功能量表作为结果工具,比较麦肯锡方法和腰椎核心稳定运动在改善腰椎病功能活动和减轻疼痛方面的效果","authors":"Karthick D, Ramana K, Kamalakannan M, Anitha A","doi":"10.37506/x6x9zh58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Lumbar radiculopathy, is a symptom of radiating pain in the lumbar nerve root distribution thatmay also include sensory and motor dysfunction. The most common causes of nerve root compression areintervertebral disc herniation and degenerative alterationsPurpose: To compare the effectiveness of McKenzie approach and core stabilization exercise in Lumbarradiculopathy by reducing pain and improving the functional activityMaterials and Methods: Total of 64 subjects will be selected by a convenient sampling method based on inclusionand exclusion criteria. The study was fully described to the participants, and their signed agreement was acquired.Numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) was used to analyse thepain, and related disability.Results: With a p value of 0.0001, the mean of the core stabilization at the post test was shown to be greater thanthe mean of McKenzie Exercise.Conclusion: This study concluded that Neural mobilisation was found to be more effective than McKenzie indecreasing pain and functional ability for peoples with lumbar radiculopathy","PeriodicalId":516273,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy - An International Journal","volume":"20 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Between Mckenzie Approach and Lumbar Core Stabilization Exercise in Improving Functional Activity and Reducing Pain for Lumbar Radiculopathy by Using Pain Rating Scale and Functional Scale as an Outcome Tool\",\"authors\":\"Karthick D, Ramana K, Kamalakannan M, Anitha A\",\"doi\":\"10.37506/x6x9zh58\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Lumbar radiculopathy, is a symptom of radiating pain in the lumbar nerve root distribution thatmay also include sensory and motor dysfunction. The most common causes of nerve root compression areintervertebral disc herniation and degenerative alterationsPurpose: To compare the effectiveness of McKenzie approach and core stabilization exercise in Lumbarradiculopathy by reducing pain and improving the functional activityMaterials and Methods: Total of 64 subjects will be selected by a convenient sampling method based on inclusionand exclusion criteria. The study was fully described to the participants, and their signed agreement was acquired.Numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) was used to analyse thepain, and related disability.Results: With a p value of 0.0001, the mean of the core stabilization at the post test was shown to be greater thanthe mean of McKenzie Exercise.Conclusion: This study concluded that Neural mobilisation was found to be more effective than McKenzie indecreasing pain and functional ability for peoples with lumbar radiculopathy\",\"PeriodicalId\":516273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy - An International Journal\",\"volume\":\"20 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy - An International Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37506/x6x9zh58\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy - An International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37506/x6x9zh58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腰椎病是指腰部神经根分布的放射痛症状,也可能包括感觉和运动功能障碍。造成神经根受压的最常见原因是椎间盘突出症和退行性改变。目的:比较麦肯锡方法和核心稳定运动对腰椎病减轻疼痛和改善功能活动的效果:根据纳入和排除标准,通过方便抽样法选出 64 名受试者。采用疼痛评分量表(NPRS)和罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷(RMDQ)分析疼痛和相关残疾情况:结果:P 值为 0.0001,测试后核心稳定的平均值高于麦肯锡运动的平均值:本研究得出结论:对于腰椎间盘突出症患者而言,神经活动疗法在减轻疼痛和提高功能能力方面比麦肯锡疗法更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison Between Mckenzie Approach and Lumbar Core Stabilization Exercise in Improving Functional Activity and Reducing Pain for Lumbar Radiculopathy by Using Pain Rating Scale and Functional Scale as an Outcome Tool
Background: Lumbar radiculopathy, is a symptom of radiating pain in the lumbar nerve root distribution thatmay also include sensory and motor dysfunction. The most common causes of nerve root compression areintervertebral disc herniation and degenerative alterationsPurpose: To compare the effectiveness of McKenzie approach and core stabilization exercise in Lumbarradiculopathy by reducing pain and improving the functional activityMaterials and Methods: Total of 64 subjects will be selected by a convenient sampling method based on inclusionand exclusion criteria. The study was fully described to the participants, and their signed agreement was acquired.Numerical pain rating scale (NPRS), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) was used to analyse thepain, and related disability.Results: With a p value of 0.0001, the mean of the core stabilization at the post test was shown to be greater thanthe mean of McKenzie Exercise.Conclusion: This study concluded that Neural mobilisation was found to be more effective than McKenzie indecreasing pain and functional ability for peoples with lumbar radiculopathy
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信