{"title":"阿斯顿-坎特罗诉沃尔班克:二十年回顾","authors":"Mark Hill","doi":"10.1017/s0956618x2300056x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To mark the passing of two decades since the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords handed down their judgment in the appeal of <jats:italic>Aston Cantlow and Wilmcote with Billesley Parochial Church Council v Wallbank</jats:italic> this article considers the enduring impact of the decision in terms of the constitutional position of the Church of England as a national church and analyses the public and private functions which it undertakes. In the altered landscape of the new Carolean era, with a decline in church attendance and a rise in secularism, it examines the reasoning of the five separate opinions delivered by the Law Lords and evaluates in retrospect various of the issues raised.","PeriodicalId":53956,"journal":{"name":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aston Cantlow v Wallbank: a twenty-year retrospective\",\"authors\":\"Mark Hill\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s0956618x2300056x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To mark the passing of two decades since the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords handed down their judgment in the appeal of <jats:italic>Aston Cantlow and Wilmcote with Billesley Parochial Church Council v Wallbank</jats:italic> this article considers the enduring impact of the decision in terms of the constitutional position of the Church of England as a national church and analyses the public and private functions which it undertakes. In the altered landscape of the new Carolean era, with a decline in church attendance and a rise in secularism, it examines the reasoning of the five separate opinions delivered by the Law Lords and evaluates in retrospect various of the issues raised.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecclesiastical Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecclesiastical Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x2300056x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecclesiastical Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0956618x2300056x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
为纪念上议院司法委员会对 Aston Cantlow 和 Wilmcote 与 Billesley 教区教会理事会诉 Wallbank 一案的上诉做出判决二十年,本文从英格兰教会作为国家教会的宪法地位的角度,探讨了该判决的持久影响,并分析了英格兰教会承担的公共和私人职能。在教会出席率下降、世俗主义兴起的新卡罗莱时代,该文探讨了上议院五项独立意见的推理,并对提出的各种问题进行了回顾性评估。
Aston Cantlow v Wallbank: a twenty-year retrospective
To mark the passing of two decades since the Judicial Committee of the House of Lords handed down their judgment in the appeal of Aston Cantlow and Wilmcote with Billesley Parochial Church Council v Wallbank this article considers the enduring impact of the decision in terms of the constitutional position of the Church of England as a national church and analyses the public and private functions which it undertakes. In the altered landscape of the new Carolean era, with a decline in church attendance and a rise in secularism, it examines the reasoning of the five separate opinions delivered by the Law Lords and evaluates in retrospect various of the issues raised.