海洋空间规划:关于其概念、方法和工具的系统文献综述(2004-2020 年)

IF 2.2 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Teresa Rafael, Henrique Cabral, João Mourato, João Ferrão
{"title":"海洋空间规划:关于其概念、方法和工具的系统文献综述(2004-2020 年)","authors":"Teresa Rafael, Henrique Cabral, João Mourato, João Ferrão","doi":"10.1007/s40152-023-00349-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Marine spatial planning (MSP) was developed as a process for managing the marine environment under the scenario of increased demand for space with different uses and economic activities. In the last decades, the research interest in MSP has been reflected by the growing number of published scientific articles on this subject. Nonetheless, a systematic scientific literature review on MSP is still lacking. In this context, the present study is aimed at performing a global review highlighting the main trends and patterns of scientific article contents focusing on the concepts, approaches, and tools that have been used to inform and shape MSP. After text screening and application of the eligibility criteria, a total of 476 articles published between 2004 and 2020 were included in the analysis. The results showed that most studies published so far (74%) focused on conceptual aspects of governance issues (<i>n</i> = 98), investigated the role of economic activities in MSP (<i>n</i> = 98), evidenced the solutions that have been adopted to implement national plans (<i>n</i> = 71), or explored the strategies used to involve stakeholders in MSP (<i>n</i> = 83). A trend towards MSP applicability was expressed by the increasing number of studies related to stakeholders’ engagement methodologies, together with the development of decision support tools for MSP implementation in recent years. Overall, including progressive methodologies in the evaluation and assessment of all stages of MSP are needed to foster its applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":45628,"journal":{"name":"Maritime Studies","volume":"52 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marine spatial planning: a systematic literature review on its concepts, approaches, and tools (2004–2020)\",\"authors\":\"Teresa Rafael, Henrique Cabral, João Mourato, João Ferrão\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40152-023-00349-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Marine spatial planning (MSP) was developed as a process for managing the marine environment under the scenario of increased demand for space with different uses and economic activities. In the last decades, the research interest in MSP has been reflected by the growing number of published scientific articles on this subject. Nonetheless, a systematic scientific literature review on MSP is still lacking. In this context, the present study is aimed at performing a global review highlighting the main trends and patterns of scientific article contents focusing on the concepts, approaches, and tools that have been used to inform and shape MSP. After text screening and application of the eligibility criteria, a total of 476 articles published between 2004 and 2020 were included in the analysis. The results showed that most studies published so far (74%) focused on conceptual aspects of governance issues (<i>n</i> = 98), investigated the role of economic activities in MSP (<i>n</i> = 98), evidenced the solutions that have been adopted to implement national plans (<i>n</i> = 71), or explored the strategies used to involve stakeholders in MSP (<i>n</i> = 83). A trend towards MSP applicability was expressed by the increasing number of studies related to stakeholders’ engagement methodologies, together with the development of decision support tools for MSP implementation in recent years. Overall, including progressive methodologies in the evaluation and assessment of all stages of MSP are needed to foster its applicability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maritime Studies\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maritime Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-023-00349-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maritime Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-023-00349-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

海洋空间规划(MSP)是在不同用途和经济活动对空间需求增加的情况下管理海洋环境的过程。在过去几十年中,有关这一主题的科学文章发表数量不断增加,反映了人们对海洋空间规划的研究兴趣。然而,目前仍缺乏关于多式联运系统的系统科学文献综述。在这种情况下,本研究旨在进行一次全球性的综述,突出科学文章内容的主要趋势和模式,重点关注已被用于指导和塑造多式联运项目的概念、方法和工具。经过文本筛选和资格标准的应用,共有 476 篇 2004 至 2020 年间发表的文章被纳入分析范围。结果显示,迄今为止发表的大多数研究(74%)侧重于治理问题的概念方面(98 篇),调查了经济活动在中等规模植物保护计划中的作用(98 篇),证明了为实施国家计划而采取的解决方案(71 篇),或探讨了让利益相关者参与中等规模植物保护计划的策略(83 篇)。近年来,与利益相关方参与方法有关的研究数量不断增加,同时还开发了用于实施中等规模战略计划的决策支持工具,这些都表明了中等规模战略计划的适用性趋势。总体而言,需要将渐进方法纳入对中等规模项目所有阶段的评价和评估,以促进其适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Marine spatial planning: a systematic literature review on its concepts, approaches, and tools (2004–2020)

Marine spatial planning: a systematic literature review on its concepts, approaches, and tools (2004–2020)

Marine spatial planning (MSP) was developed as a process for managing the marine environment under the scenario of increased demand for space with different uses and economic activities. In the last decades, the research interest in MSP has been reflected by the growing number of published scientific articles on this subject. Nonetheless, a systematic scientific literature review on MSP is still lacking. In this context, the present study is aimed at performing a global review highlighting the main trends and patterns of scientific article contents focusing on the concepts, approaches, and tools that have been used to inform and shape MSP. After text screening and application of the eligibility criteria, a total of 476 articles published between 2004 and 2020 were included in the analysis. The results showed that most studies published so far (74%) focused on conceptual aspects of governance issues (n = 98), investigated the role of economic activities in MSP (n = 98), evidenced the solutions that have been adopted to implement national plans (n = 71), or explored the strategies used to involve stakeholders in MSP (n = 83). A trend towards MSP applicability was expressed by the increasing number of studies related to stakeholders’ engagement methodologies, together with the development of decision support tools for MSP implementation in recent years. Overall, including progressive methodologies in the evaluation and assessment of all stages of MSP are needed to foster its applicability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Maritime Studies
Maritime Studies ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.80%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Maritime Studies is an international peer-reviewed journal on the social dimensions of coastal and marine issues throughout the world. The journal is a venue for theoretical and empirical research relevant to a wide range of academic social science disciplines, including anthropology, sociology, geography, history and political science. Space is especially given to develop academic concepts and debate. We invite original research papers, reviews and viewpoints and welcome proposals for special issues that make a distinctive contribution to contemporary discussion around maritime and coastal use, development and governance. The journal provides a rigorous but constructive review process and rapid publication, and is accessible to new researchers, including postgraduate students and early career academics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信