韩国护理研究中现象学的演变:范围综述

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Minjeong Seo , Yunekyong Kim , Jinryung Park , Guiyeon Sim , Youngshim Ko
{"title":"韩国护理研究中现象学的演变:范围综述","authors":"Minjeong Seo ,&nbsp;Yunekyong Kim ,&nbsp;Jinryung Park ,&nbsp;Guiyeon Sim ,&nbsp;Youngshim Ko","doi":"10.1016/j.anr.2024.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Phenomenological methods are used to capture human experience, and nursing research has long attempted phenomenological approaches in many studies. This study explored the 22-year trends (2001– 2022) in phenomenological research within Korean nursing science and identified the types of journals where research is published, common phenomenological data analysis methods, phenomena of interest, and standards of rigor applied to phenomenological studies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This scoping review followed the six stages recommended by Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) and utilized the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) for reporting guidance. A total of 4,354 articles acquired through systematic searches across seven search engines PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Research Information Sharing Service (RISS), Korea Citation Index (KCI), Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI), and Korean studies Information Service System (KISS) were reviewed. Key search terms and inclusion and exclusion criteria were used as strategies to identify relevant articles.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the final review, 568 Korean phenomenological studies were included. Among the phenomenology research, 50.4% of the total work was performed between 2016 and 2020, and the Colaizzi method of study was the most common (62.9%). Most researchers were published in nursing journals (55.8%). Nurses constituted the majority of participants (24.5%), followed by people living with illnesses (23.1%) and people of all ages. The primary focus included participants' experiences: the disease experience of the sick, the job-related experience of the nurses, and the learning-related experience of the nursing students. The median sample size of reviewed papers (i.e., 9) is relevant to phenomenological research saturation. The most rigorous studies applied Lincoln and Guba's criteria (54.0%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Advancing phenomenological research in nursing entails giving priority to diverse perspectives, rigor, and the foundational essence of phenomenology. Ensuring transparency and reliability requires reinforcing rigor through the integration of phenomenology, philosophy, and effective data analysis methods.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55450,"journal":{"name":"Asian Nursing Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"Pages 3-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131724000045/pdfft?md5=54956de4741fece7840b608b8a2932e5&pid=1-s2.0-S1976131724000045-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Evolution of Phenomenology in Korean Nursing Research: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Minjeong Seo ,&nbsp;Yunekyong Kim ,&nbsp;Jinryung Park ,&nbsp;Guiyeon Sim ,&nbsp;Youngshim Ko\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anr.2024.01.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Phenomenological methods are used to capture human experience, and nursing research has long attempted phenomenological approaches in many studies. This study explored the 22-year trends (2001– 2022) in phenomenological research within Korean nursing science and identified the types of journals where research is published, common phenomenological data analysis methods, phenomena of interest, and standards of rigor applied to phenomenological studies.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This scoping review followed the six stages recommended by Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) and utilized the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) for reporting guidance. A total of 4,354 articles acquired through systematic searches across seven search engines PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Research Information Sharing Service (RISS), Korea Citation Index (KCI), Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI), and Korean studies Information Service System (KISS) were reviewed. Key search terms and inclusion and exclusion criteria were used as strategies to identify relevant articles.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the final review, 568 Korean phenomenological studies were included. Among the phenomenology research, 50.4% of the total work was performed between 2016 and 2020, and the Colaizzi method of study was the most common (62.9%). Most researchers were published in nursing journals (55.8%). Nurses constituted the majority of participants (24.5%), followed by people living with illnesses (23.1%) and people of all ages. The primary focus included participants' experiences: the disease experience of the sick, the job-related experience of the nurses, and the learning-related experience of the nursing students. The median sample size of reviewed papers (i.e., 9) is relevant to phenomenological research saturation. The most rigorous studies applied Lincoln and Guba's criteria (54.0%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Advancing phenomenological research in nursing entails giving priority to diverse perspectives, rigor, and the foundational essence of phenomenology. Ensuring transparency and reliability requires reinforcing rigor through the integration of phenomenology, philosophy, and effective data analysis methods.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55450,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Nursing Research\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 3-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131724000045/pdfft?md5=54956de4741fece7840b608b8a2932e5&pid=1-s2.0-S1976131724000045-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Nursing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131724000045\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131724000045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 现象学方法用于捕捉人类经验,护理研究长期以来一直在许多研究中尝试使用现象学方法。本研究探讨了韩国护理科学界现象学研究 22 年(2001 年至 2022 年)的发展趋势,并确定了发表研究论文的期刊类型、常见的现象学数据分析方法、感兴趣的现象以及适用于现象学研究的严格标准。方法本范围综述遵循 Arksey 和 O'Malley(2005 年)推荐的六个阶段,并使用 PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) 作为报告指导。通过对 PubMed、CINAHL、Embase、Research Information Sharing Service (RISS)、Korea Citation Index (KCI)、Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI)、Koreanstudies Information Service System (KISS)等七个搜索引擎进行系统检索,共查阅了 4354 篇文章。结果在最终的综述中,共纳入了 568 篇韩国现象学研究。在现象学研究中,50.4%的研究工作是在 2016 年至 2020 年间完成的,其中最常见的是 Colaizzi 研究方法(62.9%)。大多数研究者在护理期刊上发表论文(55.8%)。参与者中护士最多(24.5%),其次是疾病患者(23.1%)和所有年龄段的人。主要关注点包括参与者的经历:病人的疾病经历、护士的工作经历以及护生的学习经历。综述论文样本量的中位数(即 9 个)与现象学研究的饱和度有关。最严谨的研究采用了林肯和古巴的标准(54.0%)。结论在护理领域推进现象学研究需要优先考虑不同的视角、严谨性和现象学的基础本质。要确保研究的透明度和可靠性,就必须通过整合现象学、哲学和有效的数据方法来加强研究的严谨性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Evolution of Phenomenology in Korean Nursing Research: A Scoping Review

Purpose

Phenomenological methods are used to capture human experience, and nursing research has long attempted phenomenological approaches in many studies. This study explored the 22-year trends (2001– 2022) in phenomenological research within Korean nursing science and identified the types of journals where research is published, common phenomenological data analysis methods, phenomena of interest, and standards of rigor applied to phenomenological studies.

Methods

This scoping review followed the six stages recommended by Arksey and O'Malley's (2005) and utilized the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) for reporting guidance. A total of 4,354 articles acquired through systematic searches across seven search engines PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, Research Information Sharing Service (RISS), Korea Citation Index (KCI), Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI), and Korean studies Information Service System (KISS) were reviewed. Key search terms and inclusion and exclusion criteria were used as strategies to identify relevant articles.

Results

In the final review, 568 Korean phenomenological studies were included. Among the phenomenology research, 50.4% of the total work was performed between 2016 and 2020, and the Colaizzi method of study was the most common (62.9%). Most researchers were published in nursing journals (55.8%). Nurses constituted the majority of participants (24.5%), followed by people living with illnesses (23.1%) and people of all ages. The primary focus included participants' experiences: the disease experience of the sick, the job-related experience of the nurses, and the learning-related experience of the nursing students. The median sample size of reviewed papers (i.e., 9) is relevant to phenomenological research saturation. The most rigorous studies applied Lincoln and Guba's criteria (54.0%).

Conclusions

Advancing phenomenological research in nursing entails giving priority to diverse perspectives, rigor, and the foundational essence of phenomenology. Ensuring transparency and reliability requires reinforcing rigor through the integration of phenomenology, philosophy, and effective data analysis methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
32
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Asian Nursing Research is the official peer-reviewed research journal of the Korean Society of Nursing Science, and is devoted to publication of a wide range of research that will contribute to the body of nursing science and inform the practice of nursing, nursing education, administration, and history, on health issues relevant to nursing, and on the testing of research findings in practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信